能動型「～テアル」構文と「～テオク」構文との比較分析(2) -複文構造をとる例文の特徴比較を中心に-
The analysis of the comparison between active model 'tearu'sentence and 'teoku'sentence analysis -Mainly on the characteristic comparison of the sentence structure to take complex sentence structure-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this report, I analyzed the comparison with active model "~テアル" sentence structure and the "~テオク" sentence structure mainly on three next sides to be seen in the example sentence which tookcomplex sentence structure. [1] Frequency to show both sentence structures in the form of the ornamentation clause[2] Frequency to show both sentence structures as a dependent clause and a main clause[3] Frequency to appear with the dependent clause that both sentence structures expressa purpose, an intentionAs a result, in the case of [1], the frequency to appear as the form that activemodel "~テアル"sentence structure modified a noun in comparison with "~テオク" sentence structure knew few things. And it was a few, but it was confirmed that was frequent that "~テオク" sentence structure was usedas a dependent clause in comparison with active voice model "~テアル" sentence structure when itwatched the result of [2]Finally the tendency that was easy to appear with the dependent clause that "~テオク" sentencestructure expressed a purpose, an intention in comparison with active voice model "~テアル" sentencestructure was seen when I watched the result of [3]While structural semantic similarity was recognized conventionally, I did not reach the systematic andminute comparison analysis of active voice model "~テアル" sentence structure and the "~テオク"sentence structure. But, mainly on through this report particularly an example sentence taking complexsentence structure, it is judged that a difference and a similarity became clear.
Abstract
In this report, I analyzed the comparison with active model "~テアル" sentence structure and the "~テオク" sentence structure mainly on three next sides to be seen in the example sentence which tookcomplex sentence structure. [1] Frequency to show both sentence structures in the form of the ornamentation clause[2] Frequency to show both sentence structures as a dependent clause and a main clause[3] Frequency to appear with the dependent clause that both sentence structures expressa purpose, an intentionAs a result, in the case of [1], the frequency to appear as the form that activemodel "~テアル"sentence structure modified a noun in comparison with "~テオク" sentence structure knew few things. And it was a few, but it was confirmed that was frequent that "~テオク" sentence structure was usedas a dependent clause in comparison with active voice model "~テアル" sentence structure when itwatched the result of [2]Finally the tendency that was easy to appear with the dependent clause that "~テオク" sentencestructure expressed a purpose, an intention in comparison with active voice model "~テアル" sentencestructure was seen when I watched the result of [3]While structural semantic similarity was recognized conventionally, I did not reach the systematic andminute comparison analysis of active voice model "~テアル" sentence structure and the "~テオク"sentence structure. But, mainly on through this report particularly an example sentence taking complexsentence structure, it is judged that a difference and a similarity became clear.
참고문헌 (33)
- 安藤節子, "コーパスに見るテアル表現の意味用法と共起動詞 : 日本語教育", 学習の観点から, 2012, pp.(8), ~[DOI]
- 李京保, "シテアル形に関する一考察", 東京外国語大学日本研究教育年報, 8 (2004), 東京外国語大学日本過程·留学生課共編
- 李光秀, "日本語「てある」文의 構造", 日語日文學硏究, 38 (2001), 韓国日語日文学会
- 浦木貴和, "「テアル」構文に関する考察", 日本語·日本文化研究, 16 (2006), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 浦木貴和, "テ形節とスケール構造からみた「テアル」構文の意味分析", 日本語·日本文化研究, 20 (2010), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 呉幸栄, "「してある」と「しておく」の接近 : 《第2「してある」動詞》", との対応を中心に日本文学研究, (51) (2012), 大東文化大学日本文学会
- 神永正史, "「テアル」構文の動詞構成 : 存在文との近さから", 筑波日本語研究, 13 (2008), 筑波大学大学院日本語学研究室
- 杉村 泰, "形式と意味の研究-「テアル」構文の2種類", 日本語教育, 91 (1996), 日本語教育学会
- 杉村 泰, "意思性のない「テアル」構文について", 言語文化論集, 25(1) (2002)
- 齋藤 茂, "「テアル」構文と対象の格表示", 言語と文明, 6 (2008), 麗澤大学大学院言語教育研究科
- 齋藤 茂, "「テアル」構文と受動表現との使い分け-結果を基に動作が行われたと推論することによる制約-", 麗澤大学紀要, 90 (2010), 麗澤大学
- 鈴木泉子, "「テアル」構文について-モノの存在と効果の存在-", 津田塾大学紀要, 32 (2002)
- 鈴木泉子, "格交替における意味の関与-「テアル」構文を足掛かりとして-", 津田塾大学紀要, 36 (2004)
- 張賢善, "「てある」に関する一考察-「∼ている」との関係において-", 日本研究教育年報, 12 (2008), 東京外国語大学
- 張賢善, "∼てある」文と「∼ておく」文の違いについて:文法構造の観点から", 言語·地域文化研究, 16 (2010), 東京外国語大学大学院
- 崔炳奎, "日本語의 結果相硏究-「してある」의 意味分析을 中心으로-", 日本學報, 28 (1992), 韓国日本学会
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味" (1984), くろしお出版
- 中尚己, "日本語教育文法のための多様なアプローチ" (2011), ひつじ書房
- 노현지, "「テアル」構文の指導法 : 中級レベルを中心にして", 일어교육, pp.2008
- 富田美知子, "有対他動詞の自動詞表現と受身表現", 人文論究, 56 (1993), 北海道教育大学函館人文学会
- 益岡隆志, "「ーてある」構文の文法", 言語研究, 86 (1984)
- 益岡隆志, "命題の文法" (1987), くろしお出版
- 村上三寿, "動詞のうけみのかたちにおける結果相", ことばの科学, 3 (1989)
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアル形の意味-テイル形との関係において", 言語, 28, pp.9~ (1998)
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアルの意味分析-意図性の観点から-", 日本語文法, 5, pp.1~ (2005)
- 배은정, "韓国人日本語学習者と日本語母語話者における 結果相を表す表現の認識度の違いについて -AガVラレテイル文とAガVテアル文を中心に-", 일어일문학, (40), pp.73~90 (2008), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "結果及び状態を表す「AガVテアル｣文と 「AガVラレテイル｣文の比較分析", 日本語文學, 1(39), pp.49~69 (2008), 한국일본어문학회
- 배은정, "「書く」・「置く」を述語とする「AガVラレテイル」文と 「AガVテアル文」の意味特徴の比較 -日本語教育の側面から-", 일어일문학, (42), pp.137~157 (2009), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "韓国人日本語学習者における「テアル」構文の理解度分析-中級以上の学習者を対象に-", 일본어교육연구, (26), pp.91~110 (2013), 한국일어교육학회
- 배은정, "能動型「∼テアル」」構文と「∼テオク」構文との比較-共起環境を中心に-", 일어일문학, (60), pp.59~75 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
- 森田良行, "基礎日本語" (1977), 角川書店
- 副島 健, "シテアル再考--他動性の観点から", 留学生教育, 6 (2009), 琉球大学留学生センター
- 山崎恵, "「∼ておく」と「てある」の関連性について", 日本語教育, 88 (1996)