본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중세국어 주체높임의 통어적 결합 제약

A Syntactic Restriction of ‘-시-’ in Middle Ages Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to find syntactic restrictions between the subject honorific ‘시’ and the other grammatical categories. This paper can be summarized as follows. ① ‘시’ has syntactic restrictions in two parts. One is in the nominal clause, and the other is in the quotative clause. ② In the case of the nominal clause functions as a subject:When ‘시’ is inserted in the nominal clause, ‘시’ is inserted in the holding clause too. ③ In the case of the nominal clause functions as a object:When the subject of the nominal clause is different from the subject of the holding clause; if ‘시’ is inserted in the nominal clause, ‘’ is inserted in the holding clause. When the subject of the nominal clause is the same as the subject of the holding clause, ‘시’ is inserted in the holding clause instead of ‘’. ④ ‘’ is not inserted in the quotative clause when ‘시’ is inserted in the holding clause. ⑤ When ‘’ and ‘시’ are inserted in the holding clause, ‘’ is inserted in the quotative clause.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to find syntactic restrictions between the subject honorific ‘시’ and the other grammatical categories. This paper can be summarized as follows. ① ‘시’ has syntactic restrictions in two parts. One is in the nominal clause, and the other is in the quotative clause. ② In the case of the nominal clause functions as a subject:When ‘시’ is inserted in the nominal clause, ‘시’ is inserted in the holding clause too. ③ In the case of the nominal clause functions as a object:When the subject of the nominal clause is different from the subject of the holding clause; if ‘시’ is inserted in the nominal clause, ‘’ is inserted in the holding clause. When the subject of the nominal clause is the same as the subject of the holding clause, ‘시’ is inserted in the holding clause instead of ‘’. ④ ‘’ is not inserted in the quotative clause when ‘시’ is inserted in the holding clause. ⑤ When ‘’ and ‘시’ are inserted in the holding clause, ‘’ is inserted in the quotative clause.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 고영근, "표준 중세국어 문법론" (1997), 집문당
  2. 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구" (1985), 집문당
  3. 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (1992), 민음사
  4. 권재일, "한국어 문법사" (1998), 박이정
  5. 김석득, "우리말 형태론" (1971), 탑출판사
  6. 김영희, "한국어 통사론의 모색" (1988), 탑출판사
  7. 김용경, "문법화의 단계성에 대한 고찰", 한글, 256, pp.45~68 (2002), 한글학회
  8. 박동근, "한국어의 통사적 접사 설정에 대한 비판적 검토", 한말연구, 7, pp.149~172 (2000), 한말연구학회
  9. 서정수, "국어 문법의 연구 Ⅱ" (1978), 한국문화사
  10. 이근영, "첩해몽어의 음운학적 연구", 한말연구, pp.145~163 (2003), 한말연구학회
  11. 전정례, "언어는 왜, 어떻게 변화하는가", 한말연구, (19), pp.347~369 (2006), 한말연구학회
  12. 조오현, "현대국어의 이유구문에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1990
  13. 허 웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
  14. 허 웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사
  15. 허원욱, "16세기 임자말로 기능하는 이름마디", 한말연구, 4, pp.407~422 (1998), 한말연구학회
  16. 허원욱, "중세국어 말풀이 인용구조 연구", 한말연구, (23), pp.453~472 (2008), 한말연구학회
  17. 허원욱, "중세국어 객체높임의 통어적 결합 제약", 한글, (289), pp.107~123 (2010), 한글학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)