본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

존대 형태소 ‘-시-’의 의미와 문법

The Semantics and Grammar of the Honorific Morpheme ‘-si-’

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The basic and general understanding about Korean honorific morpheme ‘-si-’ is that it is subject honorific expression. But all the usages of it do not agree with this general conception. Namely, it seems likely that some usages are used to honour locative or genitive noun phrases. Moreover some honorific subjects cannot be honoured by this morpheme. If this kind of usages cannot be taken for exceptions, we should find out the true nature of it, by which we can explain them as well. In this paper I reexamined these questionable usages, focussing on so called dual subject sentences. Despite of this process, I can still say that ‘-si-’ is subject honorific morpheme on condition that we should modify the concept of the subject. That is to say, only the subject which meets not only grammatical condition but also semantic condition as a subject, can be honoured by ‘-si-’. To reach this conclusion, I need a proposition and I should revise a rule about complex sentence. The proposition is that so called the dual subject sentence is a complex sentence with predicate clause and the first noun phrase is the subject of matrix clause. I should also revise the rule that there is a barrier between matrix and embedded clauses in a complex sentence like follows. Namely the barrier is made by clause marker, so there is no such barrier in the complex sentence with predicate clause, because there is no such clause marker. There are some remainders which cannot be explained by the hypothesis above. But these kind of usages cannot be made regularly, so I can say these are made by analogy and these can be taken for mere exceptions.

Abstract

The basic and general understanding about Korean honorific morpheme ‘-si-’ is that it is subject honorific expression. But all the usages of it do not agree with this general conception. Namely, it seems likely that some usages are used to honour locative or genitive noun phrases. Moreover some honorific subjects cannot be honoured by this morpheme. If this kind of usages cannot be taken for exceptions, we should find out the true nature of it, by which we can explain them as well. In this paper I reexamined these questionable usages, focussing on so called dual subject sentences. Despite of this process, I can still say that ‘-si-’ is subject honorific morpheme on condition that we should modify the concept of the subject. That is to say, only the subject which meets not only grammatical condition but also semantic condition as a subject, can be honoured by ‘-si-’. To reach this conclusion, I need a proposition and I should revise a rule about complex sentence. The proposition is that so called the dual subject sentence is a complex sentence with predicate clause and the first noun phrase is the subject of matrix clause. I should also revise the rule that there is a barrier between matrix and embedded clauses in a complex sentence like follows. Namely the barrier is made by clause marker, so there is no such barrier in the complex sentence with predicate clause, because there is no such clause marker. There are some remainders which cannot be explained by the hypothesis above. But these kind of usages cannot be made regularly, so I can say these are made by analogy and these can be taken for mere exceptions.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
  2. 교육부, "고등학교 문법" (1985), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
  3. 교육부, "고등학교 문법" (2002), 서울대학교 국어교육연구소
  4. 김석득, "우리말 형태론" (1992), 탑출판사
  5. 김종훈, "국어경어법연구" (1984), 집문당
  6. 김형규, "겸양사 문제의 재론", 한글, 129, pp.60~73 (1962), 한글학회
  7. 남기심, "국어 문법의 탐구", pp.52~67 (1996), 태학사
  8. 박석준, "현대국어 선어말 어미 '-시-'에 대한 연구 : 의미·기능, 관련 구문의 구조를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2002
  9. 박양규, "존칭체언의 통사론적 특징", 진단학보, 40, pp.81~108 (1975), 진단학회
  10. 박영목, "고등학교 독서와 문법Ⅰ" (2012), 천재교육
  11. 서정수, "현대국어의 대우법 연구", 어학연구, 8(2), pp.78~99 (1972), 서울대학교 어학연구소
  12. 서정수, "주체 대우법의 문제점", 배달말, 2, pp.5~22 (1977), 배달말학회
  13. 서정수, "존대법의 연구-현행 대우법의 체계와 문제점" (1984), 한신문화사
  14. 성기철, "국어경어법연구", pp.405~449 (1984), 집문당
  15. 성기철, "현대 국어 주체 대우 연구", 한글, 184, pp.81~111 (1984), 한글학회
  16. 성기철, "현대 국어 대우법 연구" (1985), 개문사
  17. 신창순, "현대 국어 존대법 개설", 문리대학보, 5 (1962), 고려대학교
  18. 안명철, "주어존대법과 구동사 구문", 우리말글, 29, pp.129~154 (2003), 우리말글학회
  19. 유동석, "국어의 매개변인 문법", 박사, pp.1993
  20. 유현경, "국어 형용사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
  21. 윤여탁, "고등학교 독서와 문법Ⅰ" (2012), 미래엔
  22. 이남호, "고등학교 독서와 문법Ⅰ" (2012), 비상교육
  23. 이삼형, "고등학교 독서와 문법Ⅰ" (2012), 지학사
  24. 이정택, "이른바 중주어문에 관하여", 청람어문교육, (34), pp.243~258 (2006), 청람어문교육학회
  25. 임동훈, "이중주어문의 통사 구조", 한국문화, 19, pp.31~66 (1997), 서울대 한국문화연구소
  26. 임동훈, "현대국어 경어법의 체계", 國語學, 47(47), pp.287~320 (2006), 국어학회
  27. 임홍빈, "존대·겸양의 통사 절차", 문법연구, 3, pp.237~264 (1976), 문법연구회
  28. 임홍빈, "{-시-}와 경험주 상정의 시점", 국어학, 14, pp.287~336 (1985), 국어학회
  29. 임홍빈, "존경법, 국어연구 어디까지 왔나", pp.388~400 (1990), 동아출판사
  30. 주시경, "국어문법" (1910), 박문서관
  31. 최현배, "우리말본" (1955), 정음사
  32. 한재현, "생략과 대용 현상" (1981), 한신문화사
  33. 허 웅, "성균학보1", pp.139~207 (1954), 성균관대학교
  34. 허 웅, "서기 15세기 국어의 존대법과 그 변천", 한글, 128, pp.5~62 (1961), 한글학회
  35. 허 웅, "존대법의 문제를 다시 논함", 한글, 130, pp.1~19 (1962), 한글학회
  36. 허 웅, "국어학" (1983), 샘문화사
  37. 허 웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
  38. Shibatani, M, "Relational Grammar and Korean Syntax", 어학연구, 12(2), pp.241~251 (1976), 서울대학교 어학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)