한국어의 주어 NP의 통사구조에서 존칭자질 삼투
Hierarchical honorification feature percolation within the honorific subject NP in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current paper delves into the syntactic process of the honorification feature percolation within the subject NP when the subject-honorific verbal ending -si occurs in Korean. This is in accordance with the syntactic subject-verb agreement under the condition that the plural verb necessarily requires the plural subject in English. The honorific feature [+HON] of an possessor within the subject of the possessive structure is a strong one, which undergoes upward percolation to the entire subject NP in the hierarchical structure, regardless of proximity to the subject-honorific verbal ending -si. The feature [+HON] of the subject of the embedded clause into the complex noun phase also undergoes hierarchical percolation in this way. Even though the strong feature of the honorific subjects of the possessive and coordinate structures is determined differently, the feature [+HON] undergoes upward percolation in the hierarchical structure in the same way.
Abstract
The current paper delves into the syntactic process of the honorification feature percolation within the subject NP when the subject-honorific verbal ending -si occurs in Korean. This is in accordance with the syntactic subject-verb agreement under the condition that the plural verb necessarily requires the plural subject in English. The honorific feature [+HON] of an possessor within the subject of the possessive structure is a strong one, which undergoes upward percolation to the entire subject NP in the hierarchical structure, regardless of proximity to the subject-honorific verbal ending -si. The feature [+HON] of the subject of the embedded clause into the complex noun phase also undergoes hierarchical percolation in this way. Even though the strong feature of the honorific subjects of the possessive and coordinate structures is determined differently, the feature [+HON] undergoes upward percolation in the hierarchical structure in the same way.
참고문헌 (21)
- 이두원, "영어와 한국어에서 자질 삼투를 통한 일치 다시 보기", 영어영문학연구, 64(3), pp.219~239 (2022), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 장소영, "주어-동사 일치의 통사적 유인", 문화기술의 융합, 7(3), pp.353~358 (2021), 국제문화기술진흥원
- Bock, K., "Broken agreement", Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp.45~93 (1991)
- Bošković, Ž., "On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP", Studia Linguistica, 59(1), pp.1~45 (2005)
- Bošković, Ž., "What will you have DP or NP?", Proceedings of NELS, 37, pp.101~114 (2008), GLSA University of Massachusetts
- Chomsky, N., "Step by step", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Cole, P., "Feature percolation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, pp.91~118 (1993)
- Eberhard, K., "Making syntax of sense : Number agreement in sentence production", Psychological Review, 112, pp.531~559 (2005)
- Franck, J., "Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English : The role of syntactic hierarchy", Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(4), pp.371~404 (2002)
- Haskell, T., "Proximity does matter", Paper Presented at the 15th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (2002)
- 김정석, "A Note on Subject Honorification in Korean", 생성문법연구, 32(1), pp.153~167 (2022), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Kotek, H., "Composing questions", Doctor, pp.2014
- Kotek, H., "Covert pied-piping in English multiple wh"questions", Linguistic Inquiry, 47(4), pp.669~693 (2016)
- Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- Radford, A., "Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Ross, J. R., "Constraints on variables in syntax", Doctor, pp.1967
- Ross, J. R., "Infinite syntax!" (1986), Ablex
- Simpson, A., "Obligatory overt wh-movement in a whin situ language", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), pp.127~142 (2003)
- Tang, C-C. J., "Chinese reflexives", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, pp.93~121 (1989)
- Vigliocco, G., "Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear?", Cognition, 68, pp.B13~B29 (1998)[DOI]