19세기 국어 인용마디의 통어론적 연구
A syntactic study on quotative clauses in 19th century Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to find syntactic rules in quotative clauses in 19th Century Korean. The analysis and its discusstion can be summarized as follows. Quotation clauses are classified into direct quotation, indirect quotation, and formal quotation. Further, indirect quotation can be classified into abstract indirect quotation and transformational indirect quotation. The former needs to be sub-classified by the meaning of ‘thought’, ‘future’, ‘assumption’, ‘command’, and ‘cause’. The latter also needs to be sub-classified by the typology of its transformations: ‘honorific transformation’, ‘tense transformation’, ‘sentence component transformation’ and ‘grammatical person transformation’. Formal quotation is neither direct quotation nor indirect quotation, but it has a mere quotation form. It is classified into ‘naming formal quotation’ and ‘naming object formal quotation’. In the former, the quotation form is added upon ‘naming’, whereas in the latter, the quotation form is added upon ‘the object of naming’.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to find syntactic rules in quotative clauses in 19th Century Korean. The analysis and its discusstion can be summarized as follows. Quotation clauses are classified into direct quotation, indirect quotation, and formal quotation. Further, indirect quotation can be classified into abstract indirect quotation and transformational indirect quotation. The former needs to be sub-classified by the meaning of ‘thought’, ‘future’, ‘assumption’, ‘command’, and ‘cause’. The latter also needs to be sub-classified by the typology of its transformations: ‘honorific transformation’, ‘tense transformation’, ‘sentence component transformation’ and ‘grammatical person transformation’. Formal quotation is neither direct quotation nor indirect quotation, but it has a mere quotation form. It is classified into ‘naming formal quotation’ and ‘naming object formal quotation’. In the former, the quotation form is added upon ‘naming’, whereas in the latter, the quotation form is added upon ‘the object of naming’.
참고문헌 (23)
- 康仁善, "15세기 국어의 인용구조 연구", 석사, pp.1978
- 고영근, "표준 중세국어 문법론", pp.368~380 (1997), 집문당
- 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구", pp.94~97 (1985), 집문당
- 권재일, "한국어 인용 구문 유형의 변화와 인용 표지의 생성", 언어학, (22), pp.59~79 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론", pp.248~285 (1992), 민음사
- 김수태, "인용월의 변천에 대하여", 국어국문학, 30, pp.331~352 (1993), 문창어문학회
- 김수태, "‘-고 하-’의 생략과 씨끝의 융합", 한글, 254, pp.161~198 (2001), 한글학회
- 김석득, "우리말 형태론", pp.403~450 (1992), 탑출판사
- 김용경, "문법화의 단계성에 대한 고찰", 한글, (256), pp.45~68 (2002), 한글학회
- 박동근, "한국어의 통사적 접사 설정에 대한 비판적 검토", 한말연구, 7, pp.149~172 (2000), 한말연구학회
- 서정수, "국어 문법의 연구Ⅱ", pp.327~402 (1990), 한국문화사
- 서태룡, "내포와 접속", 국어학, 8, pp.109~120 (1979), 국어학회
- 윤혜영, "17세기 국어의 인용구조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1978), 정음사
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "국어학" (1983), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 통어론" (1999), 샘문화사
- 허원욱, "15세기 국어의 인용마디", 한글, (226), pp.203~220 (1994), 한글학회
- 허원욱, "16세기 국어의 인용마디", 한글, (240-241), pp.147~167 (1998), 한글학회
- 허원욱, "중세국어 말풀이 인용구조 연구", 한말연구, (23), pp.453~472 (2008), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 허원욱, "변형적 간접인용에서의 필수적·수의적 변형", 한글, (262), pp.123~147 (2003), 한글학회