본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

간경도감 불경언해 사업의 또 다른 함의

Gangyeong-Dogam’s Buddhist “Eonhae” Editions And Its Implication

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper aims to highlight another point to current discourse on Gangyeon-Dogam’s “Eonhaeh”. The point that is proposed here us that an interpretation method of high authority is introduced regarding then “eonhae” of Gangyeon-Dogam. Due to the authority of this method of interpretation, other interpretation method has been ceased and only this method remains. This method has been the unified method which is continued to present times. The evidences for the claim shows that after the emergence of Gangyeong- Dogam, various attachement forms became unified in interpretation of some Buddhist text. This paper emphasizes such facts and analysis and focuses on the differences in the Buddhist text attachments in before Gangyong-Dogam’s. This paper also examines the Buddhist text attachment forms in Bubhwa-gyeong and Neungum-gyeong in 15th and 16th centuries. This paper arrivesatthe conclusion that basis of the analyses; Gangyeong-Dogam’s“eonhae”editions were very significant in education of Buddhist stext during the times. The Buddhist scripts of Gangyong-Dogam are one of the first important translations in Korean history due to the strict system of translation, editing and publication processes. In studying and educating the doctrines of Buddhism, the texts of Gangyeong-Dogam were very influential during the times when Buddhism’s influence was decreasing. This proves that Gangyong- Dogam’s Buddhists texts became standard for interpreting and the attachments interpretation method became unified. Furthermore, in the 15thcentury data, oral instruction forms are displayed not only in influence of Buddhism instructions but also in changes of Classic Chinese education(Hanmoon). In the method of translation, right attachment follows “EumdokGugyeol” and the left attachment follows “SukdokGugyeol”styles. Therefore, the reader first reads aloud and that interprets the meanings. In other words, the traditional lecture system and test method of oral memorization style of studies were completed. In conclusion, the results of “eonhae” project of Gangyeon Dogam can be summarized in three ways. First, it unified the ways of interpreting Buddhist texts. Secondly, such study process brought about enlightenment of Hoonminjungeum, the new letters, and also brought about changes in letter literacy. Thirdly, the study process of Chinese classical studies (Hanmun) was reflected in its influences of re-arrangement of the empty spaces in Hanmun texts.

Abstract

This paper aims to highlight another point to current discourse on Gangyeon-Dogam’s “Eonhaeh”. The point that is proposed here us that an interpretation method of high authority is introduced regarding then “eonhae” of Gangyeon-Dogam. Due to the authority of this method of interpretation, other interpretation method has been ceased and only this method remains. This method has been the unified method which is continued to present times. The evidences for the claim shows that after the emergence of Gangyeong- Dogam, various attachement forms became unified in interpretation of some Buddhist text. This paper emphasizes such facts and analysis and focuses on the differences in the Buddhist text attachments in before Gangyong-Dogam’s. This paper also examines the Buddhist text attachment forms in Bubhwa-gyeong and Neungum-gyeong in 15th and 16th centuries. This paper arrivesatthe conclusion that basis of the analyses; Gangyeong-Dogam’s“eonhae”editions were very significant in education of Buddhist stext during the times. The Buddhist scripts of Gangyong-Dogam are one of the first important translations in Korean history due to the strict system of translation, editing and publication processes. In studying and educating the doctrines of Buddhism, the texts of Gangyeong-Dogam were very influential during the times when Buddhism’s influence was decreasing. This proves that Gangyong- Dogam’s Buddhists texts became standard for interpreting and the attachments interpretation method became unified. Furthermore, in the 15thcentury data, oral instruction forms are displayed not only in influence of Buddhism instructions but also in changes of Classic Chinese education(Hanmoon). In the method of translation, right attachment follows “EumdokGugyeol” and the left attachment follows “SukdokGugyeol”styles. Therefore, the reader first reads aloud and that interprets the meanings. In other words, the traditional lecture system and test method of oral memorization style of studies were completed. In conclusion, the results of “eonhae” project of Gangyeon Dogam can be summarized in three ways. First, it unified the ways of interpreting Buddhist texts. Secondly, such study process brought about enlightenment of Hoonminjungeum, the new letters, and also brought about changes in letter literacy. Thirdly, the study process of Chinese classical studies (Hanmun) was reflected in its influences of re-arrangement of the empty spaces in Hanmun texts.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 고영섭, "한국의 불전번역과 불서 간행", 文學史學哲學, 25(26), pp.34~145 (2011), 한국불교사연구소
  2. 권연웅, "세조대의 불교정책", 진단학보, 75, pp.197~218 (1993), 진단학회
  3. 김기종, "15세기 불전언해의 시대적 맥락과 그 성격 - 간경도감본 언해불전을 중심으로 -", 동악어문학, (58), pp.95~122 (2012), 동악어문학회
  4. 김무봉, "조선시대의 간경도감 간행의 한글 경전 연구", 한국사상과 문화, (23), pp.373~418 (2004), 한국사상문화학회
  5. 김무봉, "조선 전기 언해 사업의 현황과 사회 문화적 의의", 동악어문학, (58), pp.5~50 (2012), 동악어문학회
  6. 윤용선, "15세기 언해자료와 구결문" (2003), 역락
  7. 김영배, "국어사자료연구", pp.193~294 (2000), 월인
  8. 김윤식, "조선 세조의 학술활동과 서적문화에 대한 고찰", 서지학연구, (29), pp.15~48 (2004), 한국서지학회
  9. 박세연, "朝鮮初期 世祖代 佛敎的 祥瑞의 政治的 意味", 史叢(사총), (74), pp.25~66 (2011), 역사연구소
  10. 박정숙, "세조대 간경도감의 설치와 불전간행", 역사와 세계, 20, pp.35~77 (1996), 부산대사학회
  11. 안계현, "한국불교사연구" (1982), 동화출판공사
  12. 이전경, "15세기 불경의 구결 표기법 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2002
  13. 이정주, "世祖代 後半期의 佛敎的 祥瑞와 恩典", 민족문화연구, (44), pp.237~269 (2006), 민족문화연구원
  14. 조남욱, "세종의 불교 수용에 관한 연구", 윤리교육연구, (24), pp.299~314 (2011), 한국윤리교육학회
  15. 허흥식, "한국중세불교사연구" (1994), 일조각
  16. 황인규, "고려말 조선 전기 불교계와 고승연구" (2005), 혜안

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)