초기 언해본의 번역인문학적 탐구 - 訓民正音諺解, 釋譜詳節, 月印釋譜의 서문들을 중심으로
Translative humanscientific Research on the Early Eonhae Texts
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Without a doubt, the history of humanities is the history of translation. Throughout the history of humankind, translation has been the most important source of intellectual knowledge, and thus establishment of the general rules in traductology is the basis of the humanities. Translation of Sanskrit texts made significant contributions to the development of Classical Chinese, and Korean alphabet became the best epistémé of the time through the translation of the Classical Chinese, the Mongolian, and the Tibetan texts. The mode and contents of the early Eonhae texts, such as Hunminjeongeum-Eonhae(訓民正音諺解), Sukbosangjul-Seo(釋譜詳節序), and Wolinsukbo-Seo(月印釋譜序), are products of the best efforts of the intellectual community at the time, and became the paragon of style and écriture in Korean through the following four translations steps: Classical Chinese — Gugyeol — translation of the words — Eonhae. Especially the prefaces of the Eonhae texts have significant meaning in the history of translation. King Sejo’s Wolinsukbo-Seo shows his great appreciation on humanscientific study, and it is among the best theories of translation in the world. Moreover, the translators of the Eonhae texts did not solely relied on dynamical reception or literary translation. They used both methods and therefore the Eonhae texts became the paragon of translation, which combines various modern theories of translation in the West. We must recognize the significance of the history of translation in Korea through the study of the translational methodology of hyeobju and gugyul in the early Eonhae Texts.
Abstract
Without a doubt, the history of humanities is the history of translation. Throughout the history of humankind, translation has been the most important source of intellectual knowledge, and thus establishment of the general rules in traductology is the basis of the humanities. Translation of Sanskrit texts made significant contributions to the development of Classical Chinese, and Korean alphabet became the best epistémé of the time through the translation of the Classical Chinese, the Mongolian, and the Tibetan texts. The mode and contents of the early Eonhae texts, such as Hunminjeongeum-Eonhae(訓民正音諺解), Sukbosangjul-Seo(釋譜詳節序), and Wolinsukbo-Seo(月印釋譜序), are products of the best efforts of the intellectual community at the time, and became the paragon of style and écriture in Korean through the following four translations steps: Classical Chinese — Gugyeol — translation of the words — Eonhae. Especially the prefaces of the Eonhae texts have significant meaning in the history of translation. King Sejo’s Wolinsukbo-Seo shows his great appreciation on humanscientific study, and it is among the best theories of translation in the world. Moreover, the translators of the Eonhae texts did not solely relied on dynamical reception or literary translation. They used both methods and therefore the Eonhae texts became the paragon of translation, which combines various modern theories of translation in the West. We must recognize the significance of the history of translation in Korea through the study of the translational methodology of hyeobju and gugyul in the early Eonhae Texts.
참고문헌 (42)
- 강신항, "역학과 훈민정음 해례 이론", pp.1~28 (2006), 태동고전연구소
- 고령신씨 문서간행회, "국역보한재집" (1984)
- 김남희, "통역의 역사 개관 - 고려시대까지", 통번역학연구, 16(1), pp.1~19 (2012), 통번역연구소
- 김석득, "우리말 연구사" (2009), 태학사
- 김영배, "조선 초기의 역경:최초의 역경 석보상절을 중심으로" (2002), 대각사상
- 남경란, "여말선초 음독 구결 자형과 기능의 통시적 연구" (2009), 경인문화사
- 남성우, "월인석보와 법화경언해의 동의어 연구" (2001), 태학사
- "동국정운", 대제각 영인본(1977), ~
- 박승빈, "훈민정음원본사진판" (1932), 조선어학연구회
- 박승빈, "훈민정음기념강화고", 정음, (21), pp.2~6 (1937)
- 박종국, "세종대왕과 훈민정음" (1996), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 배윤덕, "우리말 운서의 연구" (2005), 성신여자대학교출판부
- 서병국, "훈민정음신강" (1989), 학문사
- 사재동, "訓民正音 創制 ‧ 實用의 佛敎文化學的 考察", 국학연구론총, (5), pp.105~208 (2010), 택민국학연구원
- "석보상절" (1973), 대제각
- 세종 대왕 기념 사업회, "능엄경언해" (2003)
- 小倉進平, "증정보주조선어학사" (1964), 도강서원
- 송태효, "Sanskrit, 訓民正音, 佛經諺解", 언어정보, 6(6), pp.127~142 (2005), 언어정보연구소
- 송태효, "존재론적 번역비평과 시: 앙트완느 베르망의 비평 용어 ‘낯섦’ 을 중심으로", 외국문학연구, (27), pp.177~208 (2007), 외국문학연구소
- 안병희, "국어사 문헌 연구" (2009), 신구문화사
- "월인석보 권 1, 2", 서강대 인문과학연구소 영인본 (1972), ~
- "월인천강지곡", 문화재관리국 원척 영인본 (1992), ~
- 윤용선, "15세기 언해자료와 구결문" (2003), 역락
- 이동림, "주해 석보상절" (1959), 동국대 출판부
- 이상혁, "조선후기 훈민정음연구의 역사적 변천" (2004), 역락
- 이승재, "부호자의 문자론적 의의", 국어학, 38, pp.89~116 (2001)
- 이영훈, "한국에서의 번역 개념의 역사", 통번역학연구, 15, pp.129~151 (2011), 통번역연구소
- 이호권, "석보상절의 서지와 언어" (2001), 태학사
- 정경일, "한국운서의 이해" (2002), 대우학술총서
- 정광, "몽고자운의 파사파 문자와 훈민정음", 제2회한국어학회 국제학술대회, pp.10~26 (2008)
- "홍무정운역훈, 영인본(1974)", 고대출판부
- Berman, A, "L'épreuve de l'étranger-Culture et traduction dansl'Allemagne romantique" (1984), Gallimard
- Berman, A, "Pour une critique des traductions : John Donne" (1995), Gallimard
- Berman, A, "La traduction et la lettre ou l'Auberge lointain" (1999), Seuil
- Burnouf, E, "Le Lotus de la Bonne loi" (1952), The University of Chicago Press
- Dallet, Ch. La langue coréenne, "역대한국문법대계(2부21책)", 박이정출판사
- Desgouttes, J-P, "L'Écriture du Coréen, Genèse et Avènement" (2000), L'Harmattan
- Ledyard, G. K, "The Korean Language Reform of 1446", pp.1998, 국립국어연구원
- Nida, E.A, "Toward a Science of Translating" (1964), E. J. Brill., C.R
- Nida, E.A, "The Theory and Practice of Translation, Brill, Leiden, Boston", ~ (1974)
- Nida, E.A, "언어간 의사소통의 사회언어학" (2002), 고려대학교출판부
- Ridel, F-C, "Grammaire coréenne, 역대한국문법대계(2부19책)" (1977), 박이정출판사