试论≪御制满蒙文鑑≫与≪蒙語類解≫的关系
The Relationship between qaγan-u bičigsen manǰu mongγol ügen-ü toli bičig and MONG Ŏ YU HAE
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文从文献学和语言学的视角试着论证了《御制满蒙文鑑》与《蒙语类解》之间的关系。《蒙语类解》作为18世纪朝鲜司译院蒙学教科书之一，其编纂体例及所收录的蒙古语词语在多方面沿袭了清代蒙古语辞书的特点。韩国和日本的学者在开展此项研究时也充分认识到了朝鲜朝蒙学文献与清代辞书文献之间存在的关联性，就“蒙学三书重刊序”中提及的“蒙文鑑”的问题，提出了自己的观点。如，李基文、郑堤文、金芳汉、菅野裕臣等。而中国学者对该类文献的关注度较低，研究成果及其缺乏。学者乌云高娃从史学的角度对《蒙语类解》进行过研究，在“蒙文鑑”的问题方面基本认同韩国学者李基文的观点。学者呼日勒巴特尔也对《蒙语老乞大》与清代官修的多部满语文系列辞书“御制清文鑑”进行过语言学视角的比较研究。前人学者的研究视角多集中于蒙学书所体现的近代蒙古语的本体研究，未对蒙学书与满文文献的关系进行仔细的论证，本文即为该方面的补缺。
Abstract
This article attempts to demonstrate the relationship between qaγan-u bičigsen manǰu mongγol ügen-ü toli bičig and MONG Ŏ YU HAE from the perspectives of philology and linguistics. As one of the 18th century Mongolian textbooks of the Korean Translation Institute(Sa YŎK Won), the compilation style and inclusion of Mongolian words in MONG Ŏ YU HAE follow the characteristics of Qing Dynasty Mongolian dictionaries in many aspects. When conducting this study, scholars from South Korea and Japan also fully recognized the correlation between Mong Hak Sam SŎ and Qing Dynasty dictionaries. They put forward their own views on the issue of “Mong Mun Kam” mentioned in the “Preface to the Reissue of the Three Books of Mongolian School” . Chinese scholars have a low level of attention to this type of literature, and there is a lack of research results. The research perspectives of previous scholars have mostly focused on the ontology research of 18th century Mongolian language reflected in Mongolian textbooks, without carefully demonstrating the relationship between Mongolian textbooks and Manchu literature. This article is a supplement to this aspect.
참고문헌 (33)
- "蒙語類解" (1995), 弘文閣
- 小沢重男, "中·韓·蒙對譯語彙集‘蒙語類解’研究", 東京外國語大學論集, 8 (1961)
- 小倉進平, "朝鮮語語學史" (1964), 刀江書院
- 李基文, "‘蒙語老乞大’研究", 震壇學報, 25, pp.364~425 (1964), 진단학회
- 李基文, "蒙學書研究의基本問題", 震壇學報, 31, pp.89~113 (1967), 진단학회
- 金芳汉, "‘蒙語老乞大’研究", 白山學報, 1, pp.99~132 (1966)
- 金芳汉, "『서울 大學校古典叢書』影印本｢蒙語類解", pp.1~7 (1971)
- 崔鶴根, "月 朴晟義 博士 還歷 紀念論叢", pp.203~238 (1978)
- 宋基中, "歷史語言學", pp.337~388 (1985), 金芳漢 先生 回甲 紀念論文集 編輯委員會
- 鄭堤文, "「蒙語類解」의 몽골어에 대한 연구", 박사, 언어학, pp.1990
- 李聖揆, "蒙學三書의 蒙古語 研究" (2002), 단국대학교출판부
- 산기도르지 바트히식, "17-18세기 몽골어의 음운론적 연구", 박사, 몽골학, pp.2009
- Eerdenetuya,Purevdorj, "‘蒙語類解’의 음운론적 연구", 석사, pp.2011
- Eerdenetuya,Purevdorj, "조선시대 몽골어 역학서 연구", 박사, pp.2014
- 사수란, "蒙語類解의 어휘 연구", 碩士, pp.2012
- 사수란, "‘몽어유해’ 부가 부호 ‘ㅿ’에 대한 연구", 몽골학, 67 (2021), 한국 몽골학회
- 성우철, "清文鑑類만주어 사전의 성립과 전파, 그리고 동아시아적 변용", 인문학연구, 45, pp.7~51 (2020)
- Oriyangqadai Khürelbaγatur, "mongγol loo k id a, q aγan-u bičigsen manǰu ügen-ü toli bičig-ün qaričγuluγsan sudulγ-a, öbör mongγol-un arad-un keblel-ün qoriy-a", ~ (2022)
- D.Baγatur, "qaγan-u bičigsen manǰu ügen-ü toli bičig, öbör mongγol-un surγa kümüǰil-ün keblel-ün qoriy-q", ~ (2023)
- Dorun_, "mongγol, qitad, solongγol γurban kele qabsuruγsan toli biqig mongγol ügen-üǰüyilčilegsen tayilburi-yin nemelte temdeg-ü tuqai", öbör mongγol-un yeke surγaγuli-yin erdem šinǰilegen-ü sedkül, 3, pp.1~11 (2023)
- "御製滿珠蒙古漢字三合切音清文鑒", 四庫全書珍本.中国国家图书馆馆藏, ~
- 故宫博物院, "御制满蒙文鑒(第一、二冊)" (2001), 海南出版社
- 菅野裕臣, "关于朝鲜司译院清学书的谚文对音的性质", 满语研究, 1, pp.12~15 (2001)
- 春花, "清代满蒙文词典研究" (2008), 辽宁民族出版社
- 金哲俊, "“类解” 类文献中的汉—朝词汇研究" (2012), 人民出版社
- 域外漢籍珍本文库编委会, "域外漢籍珍本文庫15(第二輯 子部)(『古今釋林』)" (2013), 人民出版社, 西南师范大学出版社
- 乌云高娃, "元明清蒙汉合璧辞典及其对朝鲜"类解书"的影响", 民族研究, 4, pp.80~92 (2015)
- 乌云高娃, "朝鲜司译院 “蒙学” 及蒙语类解", 暨南史学, 1, pp.205~212 (2017)
- 王 平, "韓國漢文辭書史料學" (2019), 上海辞书出版社
- 栗林均, "“清文鉴” 中的蒙古语文特征", 满语研究, 1, pp.95~107 (2021)
- 崔虎男, "基于｢蒙语类解｣的朝鲜语和蒙古语比较研究", 博士, pp.2021
- 金光洙, "中华民族共同体视域下近代东北地区的民族语言交流——以18世纪朝鲜语文献≪蒙语类解≫为例", 西北民族大学学报, 6, pp.24~35 (2022)
- 道如娜, "‘蒙语类解’蒙古语语音学特征补论", 몽골학, 72, pp.37~68 (2023), 한국