본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

清康雍乾时期内蒙古中西部地区山林开发与林权问题探析 -以大青山、穆纳山为例-

An Exploitation of Mountain Forest and Forest Ownership Issues in Central and Western region of Inner Mongolia during the Kangxi, Yongzheng and Qianlong periods of the Qing Dynasty -Taking the Daqing Mountain and Muna Mountain-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

有清一代,朝廷关税来源中木税是不容忽视的一部分,因此在清廷的大力支持下,官方督办和地方社会商民自行开展的山林开发活动异常活跃。在资源开采利用的浪潮中蒙古地区尚属藩封的蒙旗山产也被砍伐运售,成为封禁态势之下的“特殊景象”。尽管学界对内蒙古中西部地区大青山、穆纳山山林的开采过程及其封禁、解禁时间的讨论颇为成熟,但关于“封禁”状态下朝廷对该地区山林开采运卖处理方式的深入讨论仍有必要。换言之,清廷为何对边疆地区厉行封禁政策的同时又容许偷伐运卖山林行为的发生,甚至官督商办伐运穆纳山的木植。另外在山场木植被开采运卖过程中,该地区山林属权以“界”或“禁”的独特占有形式出现,成为蒙古地区独有的山林权属形式,其中该地区召庙对周围山林的确权过程与地方社会或国家相较其范围更清晰,充分展现了其独特性质。

Abstract

During the Qing dynasty, the wood tax was a non-negligible part of the source of customs duties of the imperial court, therefore, the nationwide mountain and forest exploitation activities carried out by both the official supervision as well as the local and social businessmen and citizens were very active. In the wave of resource exploitation and utilization, the Mongolian Banner Mountain products, which were still under the domain of Mongolia, had also been stolen and sold, becoming a “special area” under the situation of banning. There are countless discussions of different dimensions on the mining process as well as the banning and unbanning time of Daqing Mountain and Muna Mountain forests in the central and western regions of Inner Mongolia. However, it is still necessary to discuss in depth about how the imperial court handled the mining, transportation and sale of the mountain forests in this area under the “blocked” state. In other words, why did the Qing court strictly impose a policy of banning the border areas while allowing the smuggling and selling of mountains and forests to occur, and even the official supervision and commercial office of felling and transporting wood plants in the Muna Mountains. In addition, during the process of mining and selling mountain wood vegetation, the ownership right of its mountain forest has gradually formed in the unique form of “boundary” or “the forbidden”, which has become a unique form of mountain forest ownership in Mongolia. Among them, the process of temples in Mongolia region confirming the rights to the surrounding mountains and forests is clearer than that of the local society or the country, which fully demonstrates its unique nature.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "清高宗实录" (1986), 中华书局
  2. 张廷玉, "清朝文献通考" (1936), 商务印书馆
  3. 赵尔巽, "清史稿" (1976), 中华书局
  4. 觉罗, "(雍正)山西通志" (2006), 中华书局
  5. 田涛, "大清律例" (1999), 法律出版社
  6. 奇 格, "古代蒙古法制史" (1999), 辽宁民族出版社
  7. 土默特左旗志史办公室, "土默特史料 第15集(上)" (1984)
  8. 赵雪波, "土默特左旗档案馆藏土默特历史档案" (2018), 广西师范大学出版社
  9. 迟 煊, "清代五当召档案资料选编" (2019), 内蒙古科学技术出版社
  10. 王建革, "农牧生态与传统蒙古社会" (2006), 山东人民出版社
  11. 文焕然, "历史时期中国森林地理分布与变迁" (2019), 山东科学技术出版社
  12. 杜正贞, "以山为业 : 东南山场的界址争讼与确权" (2023), 北京师范大学出版社
  13. 黄治国, "丛封禁到开禁—清乾隆时期对穆纳山木场的管理", 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009(2) (2009)
  14. 彭凯翔, "清代司法实践中的产权制度: 若干评议", 经济资料译丛, 2016(153) (2016)
  15. 边晋中, "清绥远城修筑时间和过程考", 内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(1) (2007)
  16. 王建革, "清代蒙地的占有权、耕种权和蒙汉关系", 中国经济史研究, 2003(3) (2003)
  17. 田 宓, "“水权”的生成—以归化城土默特大青山沟水为例", 中国经济史研究, 2019(2) (2019)
  18. 张俊峰, "清至民国内蒙古土默特的水权交易—兼与晋陕地区比较", 近代史研究, 2017(3) (2017)
  19. 杜正贞, "中国传统产权实践中的“界”—区域史视野下的山林川泽产权研究", 近代史研究, 2022(5) (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)