ОРЧИН ЦАГИЙН МОНГОЛ, ТУРК, СОЛОНГОС ХЭЛНИЙ ЦАГИЙН БАЙЦ ГИШҮҮНТ УГСАРСАН НИЙЛМЭЛ ӨГҮҮЛБЭРИЙН ХАРЬЦУУЛСАН СУДАЛГАА
A COMPARATIVE RESEARCH A COMPLEX SENTENCE WITH TEMPORAL ADVERB CLAUSE OF MODERN MONGOLIAN, TURKISH, AND KOREAN LANGUAGES
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Until now, comparative studies in the vocative of the two languages have been carried out in the context of simple sentences. However, in real life complex sentences are used more than simple sentences in spoken and written language. So, a complex sentence with adverbial clause of time has been specially considered on the example of the Mongolian language, that including complex sentences shows unique features of the vocative. If a complex sentence has two different subjects, it appears by nominative case in the clause sentence of Korean and Turkish; but it appears by vocative clause in the clause sentence of Mongolian; sometimes it appears by the zero subject. The main importance of this study is to clarify and explain this reason from the point of view of grammar and identity. When we do this, research, aimed to be as a language usage for bilingual students and to the teaching teachers. We have reviewed the special usage of the vocative in the three languages based on the imperative characteristic of the verb to be transitive. This characteristic is manifested in the subjective of complex sentences with an adverbial clause of time in the Mongolian language, but in the objective of simple sentences in the Turkish and Korean languages. This is due to the fact that is not the primary function of vocative case adjective to transitive verb and it is due to the fact that it serves as an auxiliary suffix that highlights the subject and intensifies the tone of speech. As seen from suffix of vocative in the three languages, it is necessary to learn to understand and use it in relation to human attitudes in addition to the rules of linguistics, that relates with both transitive or intransitive verb for to eliminate the prejudice that verb with suffix of vocative case is commands to only transitive verbs. We are considering that is possible, it can be explained by the characteristics of human attitudes and relationships that is not from the point of view of grammatical whether to get a vocative in subjective in the clause sentence of a complex sentences.
Abstract
Until now, comparative studies in the vocative of the two languages have been carried out in the context of simple sentences. However, in real life complex sentences are used more than simple sentences in spoken and written language. So, a complex sentence with adverbial clause of time has been specially considered on the example of the Mongolian language, that including complex sentences shows unique features of the vocative. If a complex sentence has two different subjects, it appears by nominative case in the clause sentence of Korean and Turkish; but it appears by vocative clause in the clause sentence of Mongolian; sometimes it appears by the zero subject. The main importance of this study is to clarify and explain this reason from the point of view of grammar and identity. When we do this, research, aimed to be as a language usage for bilingual students and to the teaching teachers. We have reviewed the special usage of the vocative in the three languages based on the imperative characteristic of the verb to be transitive. This characteristic is manifested in the subjective of complex sentences with an adverbial clause of time in the Mongolian language, but in the objective of simple sentences in the Turkish and Korean languages. This is due to the fact that is not the primary function of vocative case adjective to transitive verb and it is due to the fact that it serves as an auxiliary suffix that highlights the subject and intensifies the tone of speech. As seen from suffix of vocative in the three languages, it is necessary to learn to understand and use it in relation to human attitudes in addition to the rules of linguistics, that relates with both transitive or intransitive verb for to eliminate the prejudice that verb with suffix of vocative case is commands to only transitive verbs. We are considering that is possible, it can be explained by the characteristics of human attitudes and relationships that is not from the point of view of grammatical whether to get a vocative in subjective in the clause sentence of a complex sentences.
참고문헌 (18)
- Лувсанвандан, Ш., "Монгол хэлэн дэх ялгах ба үл ялгахын ёс", Шинжлэх ухаан сэтгүүл, (3), pp.64~79 (1953)
- Лувсанвандан, Ш., "Монгол хэлний нийлмэл үгүүлбэрийн тухай асуудалд", УБ: “Багш”сэтгүүл, 2, pp.15~25 (1957)
- Пүрэв-Очир, Б., "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний өгүүлбэрзүй", pp.317~ (1997)
- Aissen, J., "Verb Raising", Linguistics Inquiry, S, 5, pp.334~ (1974)
- Bilgegil, K., "Türkçe Dilbilgisi", pp.31~32 (1963), Güzel Sanatlar Matbaası
- Kuribayashi, Y., "Sözdizimsel Sözcük Birleşmesi. IV", Dilbilim Sempozyumu Bildirileri, 17(18), pp.43~ (1990)
- Zidani-Eroğlu, L., "Exceptionally Case-marked NP”s as Matrix Objects", Linguistics Inquiry, S, 28(2), pp.229~ (1997)
- 고석주, "현대 한국어 조사의 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
- 서민정, "한국어 겹 목적어 구문에 대한 고찰" (2018), 어문연구학회
- 송창선, "이른바 ‘이중 목적어 구문’에 대한 비판적 고찰", 국어교육연구, (44), pp.301~320 (2009), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 이익섭, "한국어문법" (2009), 서울대학교출판부
- 이인영, "주제와 화제－기존 화제개념에 대한 재고", 어학연구, 32(1), pp.61~99 (1996)
- Allerton, D. J., "The Notion of ‘Givenness’ and its Relation to Presupposition and to Theme", Lingua, 44, pp.133~168 (1978)
- Chafe, W., "Givenness, Contractiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Point of View, Subject and topic" (1976)
- Dik, S., "The Theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The Structure of the Clause" (1989), Foris Publications
- Givón, T, "Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study", pp.6~ (1983), John Benjamin’s publishing company
- Kwon Song Nim, "Differential function marking, case, and information structure : Evidence from Korean", Language, 84(2), pp.258~299 (2008)
- Li, C. N, "Subject and topic" (1976)