현대몽골어와 한국어의 의도법 비교 연구
A Comparative Study on the volitive modal between Modern Mongolian & Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Volitive is a form which illustrates an psychological attitude of speaker for certain situation. A basic form of in Korean is mostly modal expresstion, such as ‘-겠-‘, ‘ㄹ거’, ‘-ㄹ것이-’, ‘-(으)ㄹ게(요)’, ‘-(으)ㄹ래(요)’ For Mongolian, one-to-one correspondence with four basic forms of Korean which are modal ending such as ‘-겠-‘, ‘-ㄹ거-’ is virtually impossible. However, preceding modifier which indicates a meaning of volitive in front of a sentence such as ‘-я/е/ё’, ‘-мз’, ‘-сугай2’, ‘-на4’, ‘-лаа4’, ‘-х болох’, ‘-х гэж байна’, ‘-хаар болох’ and modal particle which is added to the back of a final ending are verified to be used as one-to-multi correspondence. Volitive modal expression in Korean is able to be divided into two forms. First one is an adverb of manner and second one is a modal expresstion which is composed of a grammatical collocation. However supposition modal expression in Mongolian is able to be divided into three forms. First one is a preceding modifier that indicates a meaning of supposition in front of a sentence. Second one is a post modifier that is indicates a meaning of volitive in the back of a sentence, and third one is an assistant verb that can be used with parallel auxiliary verbs connective suffix. This study attempts to compare and analyze the two languages in terms of syntactical and semantic feature in volitive modal expression. The purpose of the study is to investigate the commonalities and differences between two languages specifically by reviewing syntactical feature and semantic feature with comparing and analyzing syntactic functional difference. A study by Ю.Мөнх-Амгалан(2014) defined modal expression of volitive as preceding modifier and post modifier separately. Based on the researches which have conducted on volitive modal expression, this study reviews what kind of preceding component can be seen with volitive modal expression in syntactic perspective. This study also compares and analyzes how volitive modal expression is different each other in terms of semantic perspective, apart from common meaning. With this analysis, the study compares and analyzes modal expression in Mongolian in response to volitive modal expression in Korean. As a result, the study can draw a conclusion as follows. Therefore, we can verify that it is not possible for one-to-one correspondence, but possible for one-to-multi correspondence between Mongolian and Korean in the way of realizing volitive modal expression.
Abstract
Volitive is a form which illustrates an psychological attitude of speaker for certain situation. A basic form of in Korean is mostly modal expresstion, such as ‘-겠-‘, ‘ㄹ거’, ‘-ㄹ것이-’, ‘-(으)ㄹ게(요)’, ‘-(으)ㄹ래(요)’ For Mongolian, one-to-one correspondence with four basic forms of Korean which are modal ending such as ‘-겠-‘, ‘-ㄹ거-’ is virtually impossible. However, preceding modifier which indicates a meaning of volitive in front of a sentence such as ‘-я/е/ё’, ‘-мз’, ‘-сугай2’, ‘-на4’, ‘-лаа4’, ‘-х болох’, ‘-х гэж байна’, ‘-хаар болох’ and modal particle which is added to the back of a final ending are verified to be used as one-to-multi correspondence. Volitive modal expression in Korean is able to be divided into two forms. First one is an adverb of manner and second one is a modal expresstion which is composed of a grammatical collocation. However supposition modal expression in Mongolian is able to be divided into three forms. First one is a preceding modifier that indicates a meaning of supposition in front of a sentence. Second one is a post modifier that is indicates a meaning of volitive in the back of a sentence, and third one is an assistant verb that can be used with parallel auxiliary verbs connective suffix. This study attempts to compare and analyze the two languages in terms of syntactical and semantic feature in volitive modal expression. The purpose of the study is to investigate the commonalities and differences between two languages specifically by reviewing syntactical feature and semantic feature with comparing and analyzing syntactic functional difference. A study by Ю.Мөнх-Амгалан(2014) defined modal expression of volitive as preceding modifier and post modifier separately. Based on the researches which have conducted on volitive modal expression, this study reviews what kind of preceding component can be seen with volitive modal expression in syntactic perspective. This study also compares and analyzes how volitive modal expression is different each other in terms of semantic perspective, apart from common meaning. With this analysis, the study compares and analyzes modal expression in Mongolian in response to volitive modal expression in Korean. As a result, the study can draw a conclusion as follows. Therefore, we can verify that it is not possible for one-to-one correspondence, but possible for one-to-multi correspondence between Mongolian and Korean in the way of realizing volitive modal expression.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강신, "현대몽골어와 한국어의 문법 비교 연구" (2009), 한국문화사
- 고창운, "-겠-’과 ‘-ㄹ 것이-’의 용법", 건국어문학, 15(1) (1991), 건국대국어 국문학연구회
- 김은경, "한국어 교육에서‘-겠-’, 과 ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’의 의미와 교육 방안 연구", 한국어교육연구, (3) (2015)
- 김차균, "{을}과 {겠}의 의미", 한글, 173 (1981)
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 서정수, "-을 것’에 관하여", 국어학, 56 (1978)
- 성기철, "-겠-’과 ‘-ㄹ것이-’의 의미비교", 선청어문, 7, pp.76~8 (1976)
- 양지현, "의도표현에 대하여-‘-려 하(다)’, ‘-려고(요)’, ‘-려고 하(다)’를 중심으로", 배달말, (52), pp.51~74 (2013), 배달말학회
- 염재일, "`-겠'과 `-을 것'의 양태 비교 연구", 언어와 정보, 9(2), pp.1~22 (2005), 한국언어정보학회
- 유배은, "한국어와 중국어의 추측·의지 표현의 양태적 의미 대조 연구 : '-겠-', '-(으)ㄹ 것이다', '要', '會'를 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 한국어학전공, pp.2014
- 이선웅, "국어의 양태 체계 확립을 위한 시론", 관악어문연구 (2001), 관악어문학회
- 이윤진, "한국어교육에서의 양태 표현 연구", 한국어교육, 14(1), pp.173~209 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 임동훈, "한국어의 서법과 양태 체계", 한국어 의미학, 26, pp.211~248 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- 장원철, "추정표현 '-겠' 과 '-을 것이-'의 의미차이에 대한 인지언어학적 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2000
- 장채린, "한국어 의지·의도 표현들의 의미 비교 - ‘-겠-’, ‘-을 것이-’, ‘-을게(요)’, ‘-을래(요)’를 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 56, pp.1~34 (2017), 한국어의미학회
- 최동권, "한국어 ․ 몽골어 ․ 만주어의 의도구문 비교 연구", 알타이학보, (9) (1999), 한국알타이학회
- Jaroslav Vacek, "Colloquial Mongolian: an introductory intensive course" (2004), Charles University
- John C. Street, "Indiana University Publications:Uralic and Altaic Series 25, 24" (1963), Indiana University
- Kullmann, Rita., "Mongolian Grammar", pp.447~ (2005)
- Street, John Ch., "Uralic and Altaic Series 24" (1963), Indiana University Publication
- Poppe, N, "Mongolian Language Handbook" (1970), Center for Applied Linguistics
- М. Базаррагчаа, "Монгол хэлний өгүүлбэр: Өнөөгийн өгүүлбэрсудлалын үндсэн асуудлууд" (1987)
- Ю.Мөнх-Амгалан, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний баймжийн ай" (1998), Улаанбаатар
- Ю. Мөнх-Амгалан, "Орчин Цагийн Монгол хэлнийбүтээвэр судлал" (2014), Дангүг их сургууль монгол судлалын хүрээлэн
- Ц. Өнөрбаян, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний үг зүй" (2004)
- Бадамдорж, Д., "Монгол хэлний утга судлал. (Утга ялгагчавиалбар, бүтээврийн утга)" (2001)
- Бадан, Г., "Категория времени в современном монгольскомлитературном языке" (1989)
- Бямбасан, П., "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний үг зүйн байгуулалт :Монгол хэлний үйл үгийн тогтолцоо" (1987)
- Санжеев, Г.Д., "Сравнительная грамматика монгольских языков. Глагол. М" (1963)