ОРЧИН ЦАГИЙН МОНГОЛ, СОЛОНГОС ХЭЛНИЙ ЗААХЫН ТИЙН ЯЛГАЛЫН ХАРЬЦУУЛСАН СУДАЛГАА
A Comparative Study of Vocative in Modern Mongolian and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research compared the Accusative in Modern Mongolian and Korean languages and noted similarities and differences in those two languages are Altai language for the origin and belong to the Agglutinating language for the type. Then made comparative research in the Accusative of the two languages and collected examples from the literature that wrote in two languages for achieving this goal. Each language used by every person has characteristics and one general nature in every language. Within the framework of modern Mongolian and Korean languages, the most similar, the same thing is Nominative. The Accusative of two languages has the main role in the sentence and the object is formed. I worked to try to make research as become a linguistic tool because it used most widely and the probability of the increase of a mistake for students learning the two languages further. The meaning and application of The Accusative in the two languages are similar in many cases and sometimes it contains own characteristics. Each of these features is unique. To clarify between the difference of The Accusative in two languages are: The differential use of the two-language vocative case has its own characteristics in modern languages. So we clarified with documents that vocative case has been formed from genitive case by observing the distinction between genitive case and vocative case was used interchangeably. Compare the differences with The Accusative of Korean, it must use The Accusative in Korean writing language, but it depends on distinction and indifference rule in the Mongolian language. Thus the distinction between The Accusative in two languages although the verb integral contacts with a transitive verb or an intransitive verb. But in some cases, the transitive verb in the Korean language The Intransitive verb of the Mongolian forms Locative become similar by the conjugation. But in more detail, some verbs as “meet” and “sit down” form in the same the Mongolian language by the Accusative and Dative.
Abstract
This research compared the Accusative in Modern Mongolian and Korean languages and noted similarities and differences in those two languages are Altai language for the origin and belong to the Agglutinating language for the type. Then made comparative research in the Accusative of the two languages and collected examples from the literature that wrote in two languages for achieving this goal. Each language used by every person has characteristics and one general nature in every language. Within the framework of modern Mongolian and Korean languages, the most similar, the same thing is Nominative. The Accusative of two languages has the main role in the sentence and the object is formed. I worked to try to make research as become a linguistic tool because it used most widely and the probability of the increase of a mistake for students learning the two languages further. The meaning and application of The Accusative in the two languages are similar in many cases and sometimes it contains own characteristics. Each of these features is unique. To clarify between the difference of The Accusative in two languages are: The differential use of the two-language vocative case has its own characteristics in modern languages. So we clarified with documents that vocative case has been formed from genitive case by observing the distinction between genitive case and vocative case was used interchangeably. Compare the differences with The Accusative of Korean, it must use The Accusative in Korean writing language, but it depends on distinction and indifference rule in the Mongolian language. Thus the distinction between The Accusative in two languages although the verb integral contacts with a transitive verb or an intransitive verb. But in some cases, the transitive verb in the Korean language The Intransitive verb of the Mongolian forms Locative become similar by the conjugation. But in more detail, some verbs as “meet” and “sit down” form in the same the Mongolian language by the Accusative and Dative.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강신, "현대 몽골어와 한국어의 문법 비교" (2009), 한국문화사
- 김승희, "몽골인 한국어 학습자의 격조사 오류 분석 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 외국어로서의한국어교육전공, pp.2012
- 김영일, "알타이제어의 접미사 비교연구" (1999), 사람출판사
- 김형수, "한국어와 몽고어와의 접미사 비교연구", 박사, pp.1981
- 보양델게르, "몽골인 한국어 학습자의 어휘 및 문법 오류 연구", pp.2015
- 이상혁, "폴리바노프 (Polivanov)의 언어관에 대하여, 구소련 언어관과의 대조 “및 그의알타이계통론을 중심으로”", 아시아문화연구, 37, pp.127~153 (2015), 가천대학교 아시아문화 연구소
- 조영현, "한국어 속격조사와 처소격 조사의 분화 가능성에 대한 고찰 (속격조사 “ㅣ” 모음의 기원형을 중심으로)", 우리집말연구, 54, pp.6~35 (2018)
- 홍재성, "현대 한국어 동사구문의 연구" (1987), 탑출판사
- Togtokh Otgontuul, "한국어, 몽골어, 만주어 격어미 비교 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2009
- Наранчимэг, "몽골인 한국어 학습자의 작문 오류 분석 연구", 석사, pp.2015
- U. Bolor-erdene, "Error Analysis and Teaching Method of Case Markers ‘eul", leul’ for Mongolian Learners of Korea, Seoul uni., 2015
- Базаррагчаа, М, "Монгол хэлний нэрийн тийн ялгалын нөхцөлийн гарлын тухайд", ЭШБ, 8(1), pp.3~20 (1997), МУИС. Монгол судлалын хүрээлэн
- Зоригт, Г, "Монгол хэлний тийн ялгалын судлал" (2002), Өвөр монголын сурган хүмүүжлийнхэвлэлийн хороо
- Монгол хэл судлал, "Монгол хэл судлал 4 боть(Монгол хэлний түүх)" (2022)
- Поппе, Н, "Алтайн хэл шинжлэлийн удиртгал: Монгол хэл шинжлэлийн дурсгал" (1999), Соёмбо принтинг
- Төмөртогоо, Д, "Монгол хэлний шинжлэлд нэрийн тийн ялгалыг ангилсан нь", Хэлзохиол, pp.301~314 (1970)
- Хасбаатар, "Монгол төрөл хэлний тийн ялгалын айн тухай", Өвөр монголын ихсургуулийн ЭШ-ний сэтгүүл, (3) (1982)
- Санжеев, Г. Д., "Сравнительная грамматика монгольских языков (Vol. 1)", pp.163~ (1953), Изд-воАкадемии наук СССР
- Рамстедт, Г. И., "Введение в алтайское языкознание: Морфология" (1957), Изд-во иностр
- Ramstedt. G. J., "Remarks on the Korean language", MSFOU, 58 (1928)
- Ramstedt. G. J., "The Nominal postposition in Korean", MSFOU, 67 (1938)
- Ramstedt. G. J., "Studies in Korean Etymology", MSFOU, 95 (1949)