고대중국어 동사화의 내포동사 분석
Analysis of the Implication Verbs of Ancient Chinese Verbization
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Implication verbs have been reconstructed in various ways in the study of ancient Chinese verbalization, and no regularity has been found. The verbization of English is very similar to the verbization of ancient Chinese, but its implication verbs are very limited to around 10 species. The reason for the difference in the types and quantities of implication verbs is in the degree of meaning range of implication verbs. In other words, English is reconstructing implication verbs with relatively high degree of meaning range and Chinese is reconstructing verbs with low degree of meaning range. In this paper, the types of implication verbs were first categorized into verbs with the highest degree of meaning range based on cognitive bases. These are ‘shi 是’, ‘you 有’ and ‘wei 为’ that represent relationships, existence, and action. These three verbs can be subdivided into verbs with a lower degree of meaning range, depending on the relationship between subject and object. Implication verbs that represent relationships are ‘shi 是’, ‘zuowei 作爲’, ‘chengwei 稱爲’, ‘youruo 猶若’, ‘bianwei 變爲’. Implication verbs that represent existence are ‘you 有’, ‘fasheng 發生’, ‘xing 行’, ‘gei 給’, ‘shou 受’, ‘sheng 生’, ‘qu 取’, ‘zuo 作’. Implication verbs that represent action ‘wei 爲’, ‘yong 用’, ‘xiang 向’.
Abstract
Implication verbs have been reconstructed in various ways in the study of ancient Chinese verbalization, and no regularity has been found. The verbization of English is very similar to the verbization of ancient Chinese, but its implication verbs are very limited to around 10 species. The reason for the difference in the types and quantities of implication verbs is in the degree of meaning range of implication verbs. In other words, English is reconstructing implication verbs with relatively high degree of meaning range and Chinese is reconstructing verbs with low degree of meaning range. In this paper, the types of implication verbs were first categorized into verbs with the highest degree of meaning range based on cognitive bases. These are ‘shi 是’, ‘you 有’ and ‘wei 为’ that represent relationships, existence, and action. These three verbs can be subdivided into verbs with a lower degree of meaning range, depending on the relationship between subject and object. Implication verbs that represent relationships are ‘shi 是’, ‘zuowei 作爲’, ‘chengwei 稱爲’, ‘youruo 猶若’, ‘bianwei 變爲’. Implication verbs that represent existence are ‘you 有’, ‘fasheng 發生’, ‘xing 行’, ‘gei 給’, ‘shou 受’, ‘sheng 生’, ‘qu 取’, ‘zuo 作’. Implication verbs that represent action ‘wei 爲’, ‘yong 用’, ‘xiang 向’.
참고문헌 (18)
- 민현석, "영어 명사 파생동사의 의미 연구", 새한영어영문학, 56(4), pp.193~215 (2014), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 이소동, "“NP而VP(NP)”, “VP(NP)而NP” 陳述化구조 연구", 중국어문학논집, (64), pp.119~141 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 이소동, "隱含으로 인한 陳述化구조 연구", 중국문학연구, (43), pp.179~199 (2011), 한국중문학회
- 이소동, "고대중국어 동사화 연구", 중국문학연구, (54), pp.473~498 (2014), 한국중문학회
- 黃致榮, "英語의 φ派生 動詞化 硏究", 석사, 영어학, pp.1985
- 陳祝琴, "論上古漢語體詞性成分的陳述化", 碩士, pp.2007
- 高笑可, "史記體詞性成分陳述化現像硏究", 博士, pp.2013
- 李昭東, "史記指稱化現象硏究", 博士, pp.2010
- 呂厦敏, "左傳名詞陳述化硏究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 沈家煊, "名詞和動詞" (2016), 商務印書館
- 楊伯俊, "古漢語語法及其發展" (2001), 語文出版社
- 杨昭蔚, "古漢語詞類活用詞典" (1991), 海南出版社
- 張文國, "古漢語的名動詞類轉變及其發展" (2005), 中華書局
- 朱德熙, "≪朱德熙文集≫ 第三卷" (1999), 商務印書館
- Clark, E. V., "名詞和動詞" (2016), 商務印書館
- 金惠泳, "On denominal verbs in English", 박사, 영어, pp.1996
- Ogden, C. K., "The Meaning of Meaning" (1973), Routledge and Kegan Paul
