≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 확정 및 분류 문제 고찰
A Study on the Definition & Classification of Causative Pivotal Cxn in Shiji
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The pivotal structure has already appeared in the primitive period of Chinese. It is a very important structure in Chinese history. It can be divided into Causative Pivotal Cxn & non-Causative Pivotal Cxn from the constructional point of view, and the participating verbs are divided into three separate categories: causative verbs; overt causative verbs; implicit causative verbs. This is classified according to the gradient of causative level. The level of the causative verbs is the highest, and the level of the overt causative verbs is relatively high, and the level of the implicit causative verbs is the lowest. The causative features of overt causative verbs & implicit causative verbs are given by the Cxn, and implicit causative verbs depend most heavily on the Cxn. We can categorize the overt causative pivotal Cxn in the Shiji as follows: naming verbs; appointing & dismissing verbs; command & dispatch & summoning & compulsion verbs; request verbs; recommending & deceiving verbs; assistance verbs; judgment verbs. The implicit causative verbs of causative pivotal Cxn in the Shiji reflect the development of the causative pivotal Cxn. Causative Pivotal Cxn of Shiji has an elliptical pattern and a regular pattern. Among them, the ellipsis pattern is frequently found in ancient Chinese. Shiji has a large number of ellipsis pattern, and that appears to be a pragmatical purpose.
Abstract
The pivotal structure has already appeared in the primitive period of Chinese. It is a very important structure in Chinese history. It can be divided into Causative Pivotal Cxn & non-Causative Pivotal Cxn from the constructional point of view, and the participating verbs are divided into three separate categories: causative verbs; overt causative verbs; implicit causative verbs. This is classified according to the gradient of causative level. The level of the causative verbs is the highest, and the level of the overt causative verbs is relatively high, and the level of the implicit causative verbs is the lowest. The causative features of overt causative verbs & implicit causative verbs are given by the Cxn, and implicit causative verbs depend most heavily on the Cxn. We can categorize the overt causative pivotal Cxn in the Shiji as follows: naming verbs; appointing & dismissing verbs; command & dispatch & summoning & compulsion verbs; request verbs; recommending & deceiving verbs; assistance verbs; judgment verbs. The implicit causative verbs of causative pivotal Cxn in the Shiji reflect the development of the causative pivotal Cxn. Causative Pivotal Cxn of Shiji has an elliptical pattern and a regular pattern. Among them, the ellipsis pattern is frequently found in ancient Chinese. Shiji has a large number of ellipsis pattern, and that appears to be a pragmatical purpose.
참고문헌 (54)
- 박원기, "百喩經의 언어 : 중고중국어의 세계" (2015), 학고방
- 박원기, "‘落得’의 구문화와 구문변화", 중국어문논총, (75), pp.1~38 (2016), 중국어문연구회
- 程亞恒, "＜左傳＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2006
- 程亞恒, "古漢語兼語句中的若干問題", 語文學刊, (9) (2007)
- 董秀芳, "古漢語中的“自”和“己”", 古漢語硏究, (1) (2002)
- 董秀芳, "上古漢語敍事語篇中由話題控制的省略模式", 中國語文, (4) (2015)
- 杜煥君, "戰國策 兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2003
- 何樂士, "<史記> 語法特點硏究" (2005), 商務印書館
- 河貞慧, "漢語空語類與省略及隱含的屬性辨析", 湖南農業大學學報, (3) (2010)
- 金理新, "上古漢語形態硏究" (2006), 黃山書社
- 李佐豊, "上古漢語語法硏究" (2003), 北京廣播學院出版社
- 劉世英, "漢語兼語結構的象似性探討", 渝西學院學報, (4) (2002)
- 劉鑫鑫, "上古漢語中的兼語句", 碩士, pp.2008
- 劉永耕, "使令度和使令類動詞的再分類", 語言硏究, (2) (2000)
- 劉永耕, "使令動詞和致使詞", 新彊大學學報, (1) (2013)
- 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2003), 商務印書館
- 羅竹風, "漢語大詞典" (1995), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 呂吉寧, "“有”字句的語法化考察", 碩士, pp.2004
- 歐陽小英, "≪論語≫, ≪孟子≫兼語句考察＞", 牡丹江大学学报, (7) (2009)
- 司馬遷, "史記" (2006), 中華書局
- 蘇丹潔, "取消“兼語句”之說", 語言硏究, (4) (2012)
- 孫書杰, "先秦兩漢新兼語式的發展及其影響", 河北大學學報, (3) (2015)
- 孫玉文, "漢語變調構詞硏究" (2007), 商務印書館
- 孫園園, "≪搜神記≫兼語句硏究", 淮北煤炭師範學院學報, (5) (2005)
- 童山東, "“有(無)+名+動”句式不應劃入兼語式", 岳陽師專學報, (3) (1980)
- 王力, "漢語史稿" (1980), 中華書局
- 王志敬, "藏漢語古今兼語結構格局比較", 西藏大學學報, (2) (2006)
- 許嘉璐, "二十四史全譯" (2004), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 許萌, "從題元理論看現代漢語兼語句", 語言應用硏究 (2011)
- 楊伯峻, "古漢語語法及其發展" (2001), 語文出版社
- 楊大然, "兼語句的語義分類及其空語類的句法分布", 解放軍外國語學院學報, (1) (2006)
- 楊高建, "＜三國志＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 楊哲, "兼語構式淺析", 文敎資料, ~ (2010)
- 楊振華, "論先秦“以…爲…”兼語結構", 淮北煤炭師範學院學報, (3) (2008)
- 楊振華, "論動詞“以爲”的歷史來源", 淮北煤炭師範學院學報, (3) (2013)
- 游汝杰, "現代漢語兼語句的句法和語義特徵", 漢語學習, (6) (2002)
- 于濤, "論古代漢語“請”字句", 社會科學家, (3) (2007)
- 袁本良, "古漢語“之於”句的語用考察", 貴州大學學報, (6) (2002)
- 張建中, "≪史記≫的使動用法和“使”“令”兼語式", 廣西師範大學學報, (4) (1990)
- 張褘, "中古漢語兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2013
- 張玉金, "甲骨文語法學" (2001), 學林出版社
- 張玉金, "論殷墟甲骨文中的兼語句", 古籍整理硏究學刊, (1) (2003)
- 張玉金, "西周漢語語法硏究" (2004), 商務印書館
- 趙小東, "＜世說新語＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2003
- 鄭繼娥, "甲骨文中的連動句和兼語句", 古漢語硏究, (2) (1996)
- 中國社會科學院語言硏究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2005), 商務印書館
- 周正穎, "今文≪尙書≫兼語句硏究", 古漢語硏究, (1) (2005)
- 朱霞, "(NP₁)+有+NP₂+VP 句式考察和探源", 碩士, pp.2010
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions at Work" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Traugott, Elizabeth C., "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Traugott, Elizabeth C., "Constructionalization and Constructional Changes" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Evans, Vyvyan, "인지언어학의 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- Croft, William, "Radical Construction Grammar" (2001), Oxford University Press