≪後漢書≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 분류
A Classification of Causative Pivotal Constructions in Houhanshu
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The causative pivotal construction(cxn in short) of Chinese has existed since the age of Oracle-Bone Inscriptions(OBI in short). It has come to the period of Houhanshu and has continued to change and expand. The causative pivotal cxn of Houhanshu has inherited Shiji a lot, so there are many similarities. The causative pivotal cxn of Chinese divided into three categories: causative verb type; overt causative verb type; implicit causative verb type. Of these, causative verb type has the highest causativity. The overt causative verb type has high intentionality, inevitability and causality. In particular, the verb itself has this intentionality. However, this type has different subcategories depending on the difference in intentionality and causativity. We can categorize the overt causative pivotal cxn in the Houhanshu as follows: naming verbs: appointing & dismissing verbs: command & dispatch & summoning & compulsion verbs; request verbs; recommending & deceiving verbs; assistance verbs; permission verbs. By comparison, the verbs of the implicit causative verb type have no intentionality, its intentionality was conferred by construction. The overt causative verb type has a subcategory called “permission type”, which was not in the ancient times. Its birth means an extension of this construction. Houhanshu is a medieval literature that reflects the language situation of the time, so, the causative pivotal cxn of this era has many disyllabic words.
Abstract
The causative pivotal construction(cxn in short) of Chinese has existed since the age of Oracle-Bone Inscriptions(OBI in short). It has come to the period of Houhanshu and has continued to change and expand. The causative pivotal cxn of Houhanshu has inherited Shiji a lot, so there are many similarities. The causative pivotal cxn of Chinese divided into three categories: causative verb type; overt causative verb type; implicit causative verb type. Of these, causative verb type has the highest causativity. The overt causative verb type has high intentionality, inevitability and causality. In particular, the verb itself has this intentionality. However, this type has different subcategories depending on the difference in intentionality and causativity. We can categorize the overt causative pivotal cxn in the Houhanshu as follows: naming verbs: appointing & dismissing verbs: command & dispatch & summoning & compulsion verbs; request verbs; recommending & deceiving verbs; assistance verbs; permission verbs. By comparison, the verbs of the implicit causative verb type have no intentionality, its intentionality was conferred by construction. The overt causative verb type has a subcategory called “permission type”, which was not in the ancient times. Its birth means an extension of this construction. Houhanshu is a medieval literature that reflects the language situation of the time, so, the causative pivotal cxn of this era has many disyllabic words.
참고문헌 (53)
- 박원기, "百喩經의 언어 : 중고중국어의 세계" (2015), 학고방
- 박원기, "≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 확정 및 분류 문제 고찰", 중국어문논총, (81), pp.1~42 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 박원기, "≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 구문론적 해석", 중국어문논총, (83), pp.1~36 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 박원기, "≪左傳≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 분류 및 구문론적 해석", 중국어문논총, (87), pp.1~31 (2018), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 程亞恒, "＜左傳＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2006
- 程亞恒, "古漢語兼語句中的若干問題", 語文學刊, (9), pp.102~104 (2007)
- 范曉, "语法研究與探索(十)" (2000), 中国语文杂志社
- 漢語大詞典編纂委員會, "漢語大詞典" (1995), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 何樂士, "史記語法特點硏究" (2005), 商務印書館
- 解惠全, "古書虛詞通解" (2008), 中華書局
- 李佐豊, "上古漢語語法硏究" (2003), 北京廣播學院出版社
- 林琳, "上古使令类兼语动词的演进和发展", 碩士, pp.2010
- 劉世英, "漢語兼語結構的象似性探討", 渝西學院學報, (4), pp.59~62 (2002)
- 劉鑫鑫, "上古漢語中的兼語句", 碩士, pp.2008
- 劉亞科, "＜幽明錄＞兼語句硏究", 牡丹江大學學報, (6), pp.84~92 (2008)
- 劉永耕, "使令度和使令類動詞的再分類", 語言硏究, (2), pp.8~13 (2000)
- 劉永耕, "使令動詞和致使詞", 新彊大學學報, (1), pp.93~96 (2013)
- 劉振平, "也談"使"的語義演變和語法化", 信陽師範學院學報, (3), pp.112~116 (2016)
- 劉子瑜, "＜朱子語類＞述補結構硏究" (2008), 商務印書館
- 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2003), 商務印書館
- 毆陽小英, "≪論語≫, ≪孟子≫兼語句考察", 牡丹江大学学报, (7), pp.29~34 (2009)
- 司馬遷, "史記" (2006), 中華書局
- 孫書杰, "先秦兩漢新兼語式的發展及其影響", 河北大學學報, (3), pp.56~61 (2015)
- 孫園園, "＜搜神記＞兼語句硏究", 淮北煤炭師範學院學報, (5), pp.144~146 (2005)
- 王演, "構式語法硏究(上卷) : 理論思索" (2011), 上海外語敎育出版社
- 王志敬, "藏漢語古今兼語結構格局比較", 西藏大學學報, (2), pp.109~111 (2006)
- 徐丹, "語法化與語法硏究(一)", pp.224~238 (2003), 商務印書館
- 許萌, "從題元理論看現代漢語兼語句", 語言應用硏究, pp.50~51 (2011)
- 許嘉璐, "二十四史全譯" (2004), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 楊哲, "兼語構式淺析", 文敎資料, pp.23~24 (2010)
- 楊伯峻, "古漢語語法及其發展" (2001), 語文出版社
- 楊大然, "兼語句的語義分類及其空語類的句法分布", 解放軍外國語學院學報, (1), pp.23~28 (2006)
- 楊高建, "＜三國志＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 游汝杰, "現代漢語兼語句的句法和語義特徵", 漢語學習, (6), pp.1~6 (2002)
- 于濤, "論古代漢語“請”字句", 社會科學家, (3), pp.200~202 (2007)
- 張虹倩, "淺議“敎”的語法化", 伊犁師範學院學報, (2), pp.91~95 (2010)
- 張褘, "中古漢語兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2013
- 張建中, "≪史記≫的使動用法和“使” “令”兼語式", 廣西師範大學學報, (4), pp.33~41 (1990)
- 张颖煒, "＜齊民要術＞使令類兼語結構分析", 南通大學學報, (6), pp.69~75 (2016)
- 張玉金, "甲骨文語法學" (2001), 學林出版社
- 張玉金, "論殷墟甲骨文中的兼語句", 古籍整理硏究學刊, (1), pp.51~59 (2003)
- 張玉金, "西周漢語語法硏究" (2004), 商務印書館
- 趙小東, "＜世說新語＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2004
- 鄭繼娥, "甲骨文中的連動句和兼語句", 古漢語硏究, (2), pp.29~31 (1996)
- 中國社會科學院語言硏究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2005), 商務印書館
- 周正潁, "今文≪尙書≫兼語句硏究", 古漢語硏究, (1), pp.41~48 (2005)
- Adele E. Goldberg, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Adele E. Goldberg, "Constructions at Work" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Elizabeth C. Traugott, "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Elizabeth C. Traugott, "Constructionalization and Constructional Changes" (2013), Oxford University Press
- G, Lakoff, "인지 의미론" (1995), 한국문화사
- Vyvyan Evans, "인지언어학의 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- William Croft, "Radical Construction Grammar" (2001), Oxford University Press