본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대중국어 방향보어와 ‘了’의 관계 고찰

A Study on the Directional Verb Complements and ‘Le’ in Chinese

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Despite an obvious morphological difference between ‘Directional Verb Complement(DVC)’ and ‘DVC+Le(了),’ previous studies didn’t verify the difference clearly, simply concluding DVC alone can present results of an event regardless of ‘Le.’ In the process that the speaker delivers an actual motion event, however, the speaker can use a morphologically different syntax depending on which situational time he or she focuses on during the speech. As such, this paper attempted to investigate how ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le’ are morphologically different from each other. First of all, it examined ‘directional’ of ‘DVC’ and ‘resultative’ of ‘Le’ and found that the directional corresponds to the <path> of a motion event, and ‘Le’ to Phase Verb Compliment(PVC) ‘Le3.’ Also, based on Bondarko’s suggestion that the speaker selects ‘localization of the situation time’ as well as ‘non-localization of the situation time’ before making a speech, it investigated the structure of ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le.’ As a result, it was found that ‘non-localization of the situation time’ is not applied to ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le’ as it is a way of delivering the speaker’s own interpretation and information, rather than in the observer’s perspective. It is because ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le’ are adopted when the speaker witnesses a motion event as an observer and tries to describe it in his or her own term. Next, when localizing the situational time, ‘DVC’ was close to ‘durative’ since it is a realistic and detailed expression of how a motion event takes place and continues. Meanwhile, in the same setting, ‘DVC+Le’ was close to ‘perfective’ as the speaker not only describes the results of a motion event, but also implies the results continue at the time of the speech.

Abstract

Despite an obvious morphological difference between ‘Directional Verb Complement(DVC)’ and ‘DVC+Le(了),’ previous studies didn’t verify the difference clearly, simply concluding DVC alone can present results of an event regardless of ‘Le.’ In the process that the speaker delivers an actual motion event, however, the speaker can use a morphologically different syntax depending on which situational time he or she focuses on during the speech. As such, this paper attempted to investigate how ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le’ are morphologically different from each other. First of all, it examined ‘directional’ of ‘DVC’ and ‘resultative’ of ‘Le’ and found that the directional corresponds to the <path> of a motion event, and ‘Le’ to Phase Verb Compliment(PVC) ‘Le3.’ Also, based on Bondarko’s suggestion that the speaker selects ‘localization of the situation time’ as well as ‘non-localization of the situation time’ before making a speech, it investigated the structure of ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le.’ As a result, it was found that ‘non-localization of the situation time’ is not applied to ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le’ as it is a way of delivering the speaker’s own interpretation and information, rather than in the observer’s perspective. It is because ‘DVC’ and ‘DVC+Le’ are adopted when the speaker witnesses a motion event as an observer and tries to describe it in his or her own term. Next, when localizing the situational time, ‘DVC’ was close to ‘durative’ since it is a realistic and detailed expression of how a motion event takes place and continues. Meanwhile, in the same setting, ‘DVC+Le’ was close to ‘perfective’ as the speaker not only describes the results of a motion event, but also implies the results continue at the time of the speech.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 문성원, "러시아어와 한국어의 시점적 상황에 있어서 상의 의미 기능 분석>", 노어노문학, 8, pp.23~52 (1995)
  2. 문성원, "러시아어 동사 상의 의미 — 기능 분석", 人文科學硏究, 8, pp.219~241 (2000)
  3. 문성원, "상의 경합을 허용하는 문맥 조건에 관한 고찰", 人文科學硏究, 9, pp.121~144 (2001)
  4. 최규발, "현대중국어 ‘V了起來₂’와 ‘V起來₂了’", 중국학논총, (35), pp.21~37 (2012), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  5. 신경미, "현대중국어 'VX來'와 'VX去' 구조 연구", 박사, 중일어문학과, pp.2013
  6. 이주만, "불완료상- ‘결과의미’와 완료상과의 대립에 관한 연구", 노어노문학, 26(4), pp.99~138 (2014), 한국노어노문학회
  7. 정지수, "현대중국어의 상(aspect)과 부정(negation)", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2010
  8. 조경환, "현대중국어 '파자구'의 객관성·주관성 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2009
  9. 최규발, "방향보어의 문법적 의미 ― ‘起來’를 중심으로", 중국학논총, (24), pp.1~17 (2008), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  10. 최규발, "현대중국어 상 표지로의 문법화 조건 - 존재동사와 이동동사를 중심으로", 중국학논총, (31), pp.67~86 (2011), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  11. 최규발, "현대중국어 결과보어의 결과성, 타동성과 사동성", 중국어문학논집, (109), pp.35~62 (2018), 중국어문학연구회
  12. 최규발, "이동사건 틀의 구성요소로 본 방향동사", 중국어문논총, (57), pp.79~96 (2013), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  13. 曹道根, "汉语含结果性成分小句中的信息重组机制", 中国语文, 3, pp.195~210 (2014)
  14. 戴耀晶, "現代漢語時體系統硏究" (1997), 浙江敎育出版社
  15. 劉丹青, "漢語動補式和連動式的庫藏裂變", 語言教學與研究, (2), pp.1~16 (2017)
  16. 박민아, "现代汉语“了₁”和“了₂”的时间义及其出现条件研究考察", 중국학논총, (58), pp.29~53 (2017), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  17. 詹卫东, "词·语界面— 前沿研究及应用" (2011), 北京大学出版社
  18. James H-Y. Tai, "Cognitive Relativism: Resultative Construction in Chinese", Language and Linguistics, 4, pp.301~316 (2003)
  19. Lamarre Chistine, "How does Chinese Encode Motion Event? ― And a Few Issues Connected", Contemporary Research in Modern Chinese, (5), pp.1~18 (2003)
  20. Talmy, L., "Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol.3", pp.66~168 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  21. Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics Vol. 1" (2000), MIT Press
  22. Xiao, Zhonghua, "Aspect in Mandarin Chinese" (2004), John Benjamin Publishing Co
  23. Yan Huang, "화용론" (2009), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
  24. Yong, S., "The grammatical functions of verb complements in Mandarin Chinese", Linguistics, 35, pp.1~24 (1997)
  25. Бондaрко A. B., "временная последовательность как актуализационная категория высказывания и текста, в кн . Филологическид сборник М. Ннститут русского языка им В.В.Виноградова Российской Академии наук", 70~76 (1997)
  26. Бондaрко A. B., "основы функциональной грамматики — языковая интерпретация идеи времени" (1999), Изд. С, -петербургского университета

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)