对韩中双语词典翻译的批判性考察 — 基于翻译等值理论下的韩中双语词典翻译
A Critical Study on the Translation of Korean-Chinese Bilingual Dictionaries
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper based on the case of the Korean-Chinese Dictionary published by the Institute of Korean Culture at Korea University, presents a study on the problem of headword translation and example translation of Korean-Chinese bilingual dictionaries on the viewpoint of learners’ lexicography with critical perspective, to discover problems and further be helpful for building up theories and practice activities of Korean-Chinese dictionaries’ compilation. In bilingual dictionaries, first of all, lexical meaning translation embodies in headword translation. The problem of headword translation in Korean-Chinese Dictionary, such as taking a part for the whole, regarding individual cases as general ones, having one-sided views, unequivalent situation, inaccurate translation, untranslated annotation, causes unequivalent lexical meaning of some words. Second, part of speech of the source language headwords is different from the target language words which causes unequivalent in grammar. Third, the situation that the stylistic and register of equivalent Chinese words are different from the source language headwords but they are not be defined or tagged in the original text, causes unequivalent in stylistic. Besides, the cases of explaining certain concepts by using category concepts causes the situation that the pragmatic value is not in existence. As an important part of a dictionary, example and headword translation constitute the soul of the dictionary. From the view of lexical meaning equivalence, form equivalence and function equivalence of example translation in Korean-Chinese Dictionary, some problems exist. First, because of the non-equivalence of lexical meaning between source language headwords and target language words in examples, the situation that the function of explanation could not be fulfilled occurred. Second, the forms of some target language of examples were adjusted,which causes non-equivalence of forms between source language and target language and makes certain differences from the lexical meaning of source language examples . Third, the expression of some target language is not standard and veritable enough, and the situation of adopting equivalences unthinkingly also exists.
Abstract
The paper based on the case of the Korean-Chinese Dictionary published by the Institute of Korean Culture at Korea University, presents a study on the problem of headword translation and example translation of Korean-Chinese bilingual dictionaries on the viewpoint of learners’ lexicography with critical perspective, to discover problems and further be helpful for building up theories and practice activities of Korean-Chinese dictionaries’ compilation. In bilingual dictionaries, first of all, lexical meaning translation embodies in headword translation. The problem of headword translation in Korean-Chinese Dictionary, such as taking a part for the whole, regarding individual cases as general ones, having one-sided views, unequivalent situation, inaccurate translation, untranslated annotation, causes unequivalent lexical meaning of some words. Second, part of speech of the source language headwords is different from the target language words which causes unequivalent in grammar. Third, the situation that the stylistic and register of equivalent Chinese words are different from the source language headwords but they are not be defined or tagged in the original text, causes unequivalent in stylistic. Besides, the cases of explaining certain concepts by using category concepts causes the situation that the pragmatic value is not in existence. As an important part of a dictionary, example and headword translation constitute the soul of the dictionary. From the view of lexical meaning equivalence, form equivalence and function equivalence of example translation in Korean-Chinese Dictionary, some problems exist. First, because of the non-equivalence of lexical meaning between source language headwords and target language words in examples, the situation that the function of explanation could not be fulfilled occurred. Second, the forms of some target language of examples were adjusted,which causes non-equivalence of forms between source language and target language and makes certain differences from the lexical meaning of source language examples . Third, the expression of some target language is not standard and veritable enough, and the situation of adopting equivalences unthinkingly also exists.
참고문헌 (19)
- 崔冰清, "双语词典例证的翻译功能", 辞书研究, (4), pp.4~49 (2003)
- 陈丛梅, "双语词典中例证翻译的特点", 西南科技大学学报, 22(2), pp.7~23 (2005)
- 陈 伟, "双语词典翻译:本质思考与学科定位", 辞书研究, (3), pp.38~48 (2010)
- 费道罗夫, "翻译理论概要" (1953), 中华书局
- 胡开宝, "双语共现与双语词典翻译的特殊性", 解放军外国语学院学报, (3), pp.77~81 (2005)
- 黄建华, "改进双语词典的翻译", 辞书研究, (2), pp.9~18 (1998)
- 黄建华, "双语词典学导论" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 贾彦德, "汉语语义学" (1999), 北京大学出版社
- 姜秋霞, "词典翻译与文学翻译对比研究初探", 外语与外语教学, (8), pp.56~58 (2001)
- 马秉义, "词典翻译原则探讨", 解放军外语学院学报, (5), pp.54~57 (1996)
- 盛培林, "双语词典翻译与跨文化研究", 中国翻译, (2), pp.24~26 (2004)
- 谭载喜, "新编奈达论翻译" (1999), 中国对外翻译出版公司
- 谭载喜, "翻译研究词典的翻译原则与方法", 中国翻译, (6), pp.49~52 (2004)
- 颜红菊, "现代汉语复合词语义结构研究", 博士, pp.2007
- 曾 艳, "从词典翻译功能谈双语词典的翻译——以(牛津英汉汉英词典)为例", 上海翻译, (1), pp.70~72 (2010)
- 兹古斯塔, "词典学概论" (1983), 商务印书馆
- 章宜华, "双语词典翻译的等值原则——兼谈双语词典翻译与文学翻译的区别", 学术研究, (5), pp.124~128 (2003)
- Zgusta, L., "Manual of Lexicography" (1971), Mouton
- Béjoint, H., "Modern Lexicography : An Introduction" (2000), Oxford University Press