朝鮮王朝 《鐵拐圖》와 기록 增補(1)
Supplements of New-found The Immortal Iron Crutch-Li and Records during the CHOSUN Dynasty(Ⅰ)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to assess a change in appearance and supplements of Tie kuai-Li in the Chosun Immortal paintings. Before everything else, I try to illuminate my initial findings and artistic spirit of 4 painters; A court painter Kim husin(金厚臣) was often followed in Chinese style and he didn’t have any individuality. But he was successful in depicting the warm and comfortable master Zhong li-quan, the elegant disciple Lu Tung-pin, the hideous, hairy, deformed, and scantily clad figure of Li Tie Kuai. This point goes beyond the work of Chinese <Sage> belonging to The British Museum. <the Immortal Iron Crutch –Li(鐵拐圖)> painted by Lee zaeguan(李在寬) was first reported and modified a mistake by my investigation and research. A professional painter Lee zaeguan was also followed in a Chinese painting of the Southern school and inquired into a painting in the literary artist’s style closely. A court painter Lee hanceul(李漢喆) absolutely wasn’t known for striking and bizarre images in his works, but he used his imagination to the full in <the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li(鐵拐圖)>, in spite of falling behind China and Japan’s bizarre images. By contrast upper 3 painters, a great painter Zhang seungup(張承業) was a complete failure in depicting the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li and his spirit. In conclusion, I pay attention to two painters in special; The one is that <the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li(鐵拐圖)> of Lee hanceul(李漢喆) in the 19th-century aroused much discussion, ― that is the grotesque painter Yan hui(颜辉) in the 13th-century, China and the bizarre painter Soga(曾我蕭白) in the 18th-century, Japan. Technically, his paintings upheld the Yuan dynasty’s original form in the Chosun Immortal paintings. The other is that, because of ignorance in full, Zhang seungup(張承業) belonging to the lower classes was a complete failure in depicting the Taoist eternal life and the thought of Inner-Alchemy(內丹), but we can see one aspect of society and life through the portrayal of the character in his <the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li(鐵拐圖)>, ― that is “goatishness”. After all, these 4 Chosun painters have also modified the conventional styles in order to create a refreshing and unique style by each artistic spirit.
Abstract
This paper aims to assess a change in appearance and supplements of Tie kuai-Li in the Chosun Immortal paintings. Before everything else, I try to illuminate my initial findings and artistic spirit of 4 painters; A court painter Kim husin(金厚臣) was often followed in Chinese style and he didn’t have any individuality. But he was successful in depicting the warm and comfortable master Zhong li-quan, the elegant disciple Lu Tung-pin, the hideous, hairy, deformed, and scantily clad figure of Li Tie Kuai. This point goes beyond the work of Chinese <Sage> belonging to The British Museum. <the Immortal Iron Crutch –Li(鐵拐圖)> painted by Lee zaeguan(李在寬) was first reported and modified a mistake by my investigation and research. A professional painter Lee zaeguan was also followed in a Chinese painting of the Southern school and inquired into a painting in the literary artist’s style closely. A court painter Lee hanceul(李漢喆) absolutely wasn’t known for striking and bizarre images in his works, but he used his imagination to the full in <the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li(鐵拐圖)>, in spite of falling behind China and Japan’s bizarre images. By contrast upper 3 painters, a great painter Zhang seungup(張承業) was a complete failure in depicting the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li and his spirit. In conclusion, I pay attention to two painters in special; The one is that <the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li(鐵拐圖)> of Lee hanceul(李漢喆) in the 19th-century aroused much discussion, ― that is the grotesque painter Yan hui(颜辉) in the 13th-century, China and the bizarre painter Soga(曾我蕭白) in the 18th-century, Japan. Technically, his paintings upheld the Yuan dynasty’s original form in the Chosun Immortal paintings. The other is that, because of ignorance in full, Zhang seungup(張承業) belonging to the lower classes was a complete failure in depicting the Taoist eternal life and the thought of Inner-Alchemy(內丹), but we can see one aspect of society and life through the portrayal of the character in his <the Immortal Iron Crutch -Li(鐵拐圖)>, ― that is “goatishness”. After all, these 4 Chosun painters have also modified the conventional styles in order to create a refreshing and unique style by each artistic spirit.
참고문헌 (37)
- 施肩吾, "鍾呂傳道集" (1974), 自由出版社
- 垣本剛一, "元代壁畵 《永樂宮壁畵》" (1981), 中國外文出版社
- 吳世昌, "《근역화휘(槿域畵彙)》 제3책 김후신 <삼선전약> 수록", ~ (1928)
- 吳世昌, "槿域書畵徵" (1928), 啓明俱樂部
- 吳世昌, "국역 근역서화징 (上⋅下)" (1998), 시공사
- 李德懋, "국역靑莊館全書 6" (1980), 민족문화추진회
- 이동주, "韓國繪畵小史" (1972), 예문당
- 이동주, "우리나라의 옛그림" (1995), 학고재
- 안휘준, "韓國繪畵史" (1980), 일지사
- "MBC프로덕션 제작", 1990
- 李家源, "燕巖小說硏究" (1965), 을유문화사
- 鄭素春, "全眞敎與大蒙古國帝室" (1987), 臺灣 學生書局
- 張廣保, "金元全眞敎內丹心性學" (1995), 三聯⋅哈佛燕京學術叢書
- 林熒澤, "이조시대 敍事詩 (下)" (1992), 창작과 비평사
- 진준현, "단원 김홍도 연구" (1999), 일지사
- 조정육, "(신선이 되고 싶은 화가) 장승업" (2004), 아이세움
- 한국학중앙연구원, "조선시대 궁중회화(3): 왕의 화가들" (2012), 돌베개
- 유홍준, "화인열전(2)" (2001), 역사비평사
- 김홍남, "유홍준의 《화인열전(1.2)》를 읽고", 美術史論壇, 13 (2001)
- 김도영, "원 잡극 팔선희 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2001
- 金道榮, "鐵拐李의 由來와 한국적 變容― 山臺놀이와 神仙圖를 중심으로", 중국소설논총, 18, pp.153~174 (2003), 한국중국소설학회
- 金道榮, "韩国山臺儺戱裏所表現的中國铁拐‘步’研究", 韩国学论文集, 17 (2009), 北京大学 韩国学研究中心
- 金道榮, "元代颜辉<李仙圖>的美学意蕴及其时代意義", 藝術百家, (3)통권 : 114 (2010)
- 김도영, "朝鮮《李仙圖》에 나타난 작가의 심미의식과 시대적 의의", 도교문화연구, 36, pp.227~263 (2012), 한국도교문화학회[DOI]
- 박은화, "顔輝의 鐵拐⋅蝦蟆圖-元代道釋人物畵의 고찰", 梨大史苑, 22⋅23 (1988)
- 조인수, "도교신선화의 도상적 기능(Iconic Function of Daoist Immortals)", 미술사학, 15 (2001)
- 조인수, "중국 원명대의 사회변동과 도교 신선도", 미술사학, 23, pp.377~406 (2009), 한국미술사교육학회
- 韓國民族美術硏究所, "吾園百周忌記念號", 澗松文華, (53) (1997), 한국민족미술연구소
- 崔完秀, "吾園張承業", 澗松文華, (53) (1997), 韓國民族美術硏究所
- 李源福, "吾園張承業의 회화세계", 澗松文華, (53) (1997), 한국민족미술연구소
- 白仁山, "조선왕조 道釋人物畵", 澗松文華, (77) (2009), 한국민족미술연구소
- 韓國民族美術硏究所, "道釋", 澗松文華, (77) (2009), 한국민족미술연구소
- 崔玉卿, "朝鮮時代 道釋人物畵 연구", 석사, pp.1992
- 尹賢徑, "한국 道釋人物畵 연구", 석사, 미술교육, pp.1996
- 尹景蘭, "李漢喆 繪畵의 硏究", 석사, 예술, pp.1996
- 박희연, "小塘 李在寬의 생애와 회화연구", 석사, 회화과, pp.1983
- 이연주, "소당 이재관의 회화 연구", 석사, 미술사, pp.2003
