Biden Administration’s APPROACHES to Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This article delves into the problems of the U.S. strategy for negotiations with North Korea based on Neo-liberalism and look briefly at the implications for its denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula. Method: This paper analyzes the problem of the US negotiations between the US and North Korea through the lens of Neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism is a market-oriented economic and social policy approach that seeks to min-imize government intervention, focus on the maximization of private companies, market expansion between countries. Results: The biggest problem of neo-liberalistic ways of negotiation with North Korea is first, the minimization of government intervention, second, the pursuit of military-industrial complex interests with a focus on private corporate efficiency, and thirdly, China's alienation due to the strengthening of common value shared alliance networks. Conclusion: First of all, it is necessary to maximize the role of the U.S. government to revitalize the negotiations on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, which has been strained by this neo-liberal approach of the U.S. An active engagement policy is desirable, and if necessary, it needs to consider a summit for phased denucleariza-tion. Second, the control of the profit-seeking of military-industrial complexes. Despite the signing of the 9.19 in-ter-Korean military agreement, South Korea is making efforts to purchase state-of-the-art weapons from the U.S. to retrieve wartime operational control. This is causing a backlash from North Korea, giving an excuse to be in-transigent in denuclearization negotiations. Third, China should be embraced as an active partner in the denucle-arization of the Korean Peninsula. China's cooperation is essential to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, but the strengthening of the U.S.-centered value alliance will lead to China's isolation, which will prevent China from co-operating with North Korea's denuclearization. Fourth, policies that consider the weak are needed to overcome the harmful effects of the infinite competition of neo-liberalism. North Korea is inferior to the U.S. and its allies economically and militarily.
Abstract
Purpose: This article delves into the problems of the U.S. strategy for negotiations with North Korea based on Neo-liberalism and look briefly at the implications for its denuclearization policy on the Korean Peninsula. Method: This paper analyzes the problem of the US negotiations between the US and North Korea through the lens of Neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism is a market-oriented economic and social policy approach that seeks to min-imize government intervention, focus on the maximization of private companies, market expansion between countries. Results: The biggest problem of neo-liberalistic ways of negotiation with North Korea is first, the minimization of government intervention, second, the pursuit of military-industrial complex interests with a focus on private corporate efficiency, and thirdly, China's alienation due to the strengthening of common value shared alliance networks. Conclusion: First of all, it is necessary to maximize the role of the U.S. government to revitalize the negotiations on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, which has been strained by this neo-liberal approach of the U.S. An active engagement policy is desirable, and if necessary, it needs to consider a summit for phased denucleariza-tion. Second, the control of the profit-seeking of military-industrial complexes. Despite the signing of the 9.19 in-ter-Korean military agreement, South Korea is making efforts to purchase state-of-the-art weapons from the U.S. to retrieve wartime operational control. This is causing a backlash from North Korea, giving an excuse to be in-transigent in denuclearization negotiations. Third, China should be embraced as an active partner in the denucle-arization of the Korean Peninsula. China's cooperation is essential to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, but the strengthening of the U.S.-centered value alliance will lead to China's isolation, which will prevent China from co-operating with North Korea's denuclearization. Fourth, policies that consider the weak are needed to overcome the harmful effects of the infinite competition of neo-liberalism. North Korea is inferior to the U.S. and its allies economically and militarily.
참고문헌 (22)
- 홍석훈, "미국 조 바이든 신행정부의 대한반도 정책과 우리의 대응", 한국과 국제사회, 5(3), pp.71~100 (2021), 한국정치사회연구소[DOI]
- 전봉근, "트럼프 행정부의 북핵외교 평가와바이든 행정부의 북핵협상 과제", 국가전략, 27(2), pp.137~162 (2021), 세종연구소[DOI]
- 윤대엽, "바이든 행정부의 동아태 전략과 한미관계: 관여-헤징의 전략모순", 한국과 국제정치, 37(2), pp.183~216 (2021), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 이상수, "Spread of the COVID-19 and the Fall of Neoliberalism: State's Increased POLICE ROLE", Regulations, 6(1), pp.1~9 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Toby Dalton, "Negotiating Nuclear Arms Control with North Korea: Why and How?", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 33(1), pp.1~21 (2021), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- 고영은, "투키디데스 함정의 국제질서에서 한반도 비핵화와 평화정착 가능성 모색 - Graham Allison 이론을 중심으로", 장신논단, 51(2), pp.147~177 (2019), 기독교사상과문화연구원[DOI]
- Danielle C., "A Nuclear North Korea and the Limitations of US Security Perspective", Critical Studies on Security, 5(3), pp.320~321 (2017)
- Hongyu Z, "A Nuclear-armed North Korea without ICBMs: The Best Achievable Objective", The Nonproliferation Review, 26(1-2), pp.146~147 (2019)
- Kim I., "Trump Power: Maximum Pressure and China's Sanctions Enforcement against North Korea", The Pacific Review, 33(1), pp.113~114 (2020)
- Park Jong-tak, "A Study on the Use of MILLITARY Forces in the NORTH KOREAN Regime", International Journal of Military Affairs, 4(2), pp.18~24 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- 이상수, "The Strategies of ROK’s DEFENSE REFORM with Special Reference to the Peace Process and Arms Control", International Journal of Military Affairs, 5(2), pp.1~8 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 정경영, "Building a Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula and the Future of UNC", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 31(4), pp.477~500 (2019), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- Lai M., "Haven Under Erasure?: Hong Kong, Global Asia, and Human Rights", Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(2), pp.300~301 (2008)
- Salvador SF, "Beyond Paradigms: Understanding the South China Sea Dispute Using Analytic Eclecticism", International Studies, 55(3), pp.225~226 (2018)
- 이상수, "The Trump Administration’s NEGOTIATION STRATEGY Towards the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: South Korea’s Response", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 6(1), pp.10~17 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 조성구, "The United Nation's Response Strategy for North KOREA's DENUCLEARIZATION", International Journal of Military Affairs, 3(2), pp.20~28 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Roy RK, "Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas" (2007), Routledge
- Andrew B., "Washington Rules" (2010), Metropolitan Books