Recognition of the Strategic Situation of US-China Relations after the U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan: Focusing on Policy Implications for Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The re-occupation of Afghanistan by the U.S. troops and the Taliban gives many lessons to the security of the Korean Peninsula. As shown in Vietnam Communization, the poor Taliban troops beat the rich troops of the U.S.-backed Kabul regime, which lacks a will to fight and strategy. The purpose of this study is to discover the implications of the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan with a neoliberal perspective and its implications for security and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula. Method: This paper analyzes the US withdrawal from Afghanistan with the theory of Radall Schweller's neoclassical realism and explains political implications toward the Korean Peninsula. This paper will examine four major domestic factors in neoclassical realism focus on nationalism, military ability to mobilize, the influence of domestic interest groups, and nationalism and ideology. It suggests four implications over security and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula by using the theory of the Neo-classical realism's perspective. Results: First, the withdrawal of the U.S. from Afghanistan can be seen as an expression of shrinking nationalism stemming from the U.S. priority that has emerged since the Trump era. Second, the continued burden of the war due to the worsening financial situation in the U.S. due to COVID-19 and the fatigue of the accumulated war was a cause for the US to withdraw from Afghanistan. Third, to win the votes of the white middle class in the Midwest of the United States, known as Trump's supporters, President Biden decided to withdraw from the need to rebuild the middle class. Fourth, the U.S. Biden administration decided to withdraw troops to focus on checking China, an authoritarian regime, based on value diplomacy that values democracy and human rights. Conclusion: As the Biden administration put more weight on checking China, the declaration of the end of the war pushed by the Moon Jae-in administration has been put on the back burner. The end-of-war declaration pushed by the South Korean government is opposed by the U.S. government as it weakens the justification for the presence of U.S. troops in South Korea that is a strategic hub for checking China. The Biden administration is im-plementing a policy to actively intervene in human rights issues in China and North Korea, focusing on value diplomacy, and is tightening sanctions against those involved, worsening the atmosphere of dialogue for negotiations. South Korea needs quiet diplomacy to promote the peace process. The U.S. sanctions on North Korea are creating an atmosphere and cause for North Korea to provoke more militarily in the future, raising the need to maintain a military response posture to South Korea and the US.
Abstract
Purpose: The re-occupation of Afghanistan by the U.S. troops and the Taliban gives many lessons to the security of the Korean Peninsula. As shown in Vietnam Communization, the poor Taliban troops beat the rich troops of the U.S.-backed Kabul regime, which lacks a will to fight and strategy. The purpose of this study is to discover the implications of the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan with a neoliberal perspective and its implications for security and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula. Method: This paper analyzes the US withdrawal from Afghanistan with the theory of Radall Schweller's neoclassical realism and explains political implications toward the Korean Peninsula. This paper will examine four major domestic factors in neoclassical realism focus on nationalism, military ability to mobilize, the influence of domestic interest groups, and nationalism and ideology. It suggests four implications over security and denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula by using the theory of the Neo-classical realism's perspective. Results: First, the withdrawal of the U.S. from Afghanistan can be seen as an expression of shrinking nationalism stemming from the U.S. priority that has emerged since the Trump era. Second, the continued burden of the war due to the worsening financial situation in the U.S. due to COVID-19 and the fatigue of the accumulated war was a cause for the US to withdraw from Afghanistan. Third, to win the votes of the white middle class in the Midwest of the United States, known as Trump's supporters, President Biden decided to withdraw from the need to rebuild the middle class. Fourth, the U.S. Biden administration decided to withdraw troops to focus on checking China, an authoritarian regime, based on value diplomacy that values democracy and human rights. Conclusion: As the Biden administration put more weight on checking China, the declaration of the end of the war pushed by the Moon Jae-in administration has been put on the back burner. The end-of-war declaration pushed by the South Korean government is opposed by the U.S. government as it weakens the justification for the presence of U.S. troops in South Korea that is a strategic hub for checking China. The Biden administration is im-plementing a policy to actively intervene in human rights issues in China and North Korea, focusing on value diplomacy, and is tightening sanctions against those involved, worsening the atmosphere of dialogue for negotiations. South Korea needs quiet diplomacy to promote the peace process. The U.S. sanctions on North Korea are creating an atmosphere and cause for North Korea to provoke more militarily in the future, raising the need to maintain a military response posture to South Korea and the US.
참고문헌 (23)
- 박상현, "전망이론(Prospect Theory)과 미국 외교: 전망이론의 관점에서 본 미국의 반 테러전략과 한반도", 한국정치외교사논총, 30(1), pp.135~160 (2008), 한국정치외교사학회[DOI]
- 양순일, "'전략 및 작전적수준'에서의 아프가니스탄전쟁 연구", 군사연구, (147), pp.315~342 (2019), 육군군사연구소[DOI]
- 최윤철, "아프가니스탄전쟁의 장기화 원인에 대한 연구 - 통일과정에 주는 함의를 바탕으로 -", 통일인문학, 77, pp.325~361 (2019), 인문학연구원[DOI]
- 박찬기, "이슬람국가(IS) 현상과 새로운 양상의 국제안보위협에 관한 연구", 한국중동학회논총, 38(3), pp.25~72 (2018), 한국중동학회[DOI]
- Schweller R, "A Tale of Two Realisms : Expanding the Institutions Debate", Mershon International Studies Review, 41(1), pp.13~14 (1887)
- Kitchen N, "Systemic Pressures and Domestic Ideas : A Neoclassical Realist Model of Grand Strategy Formation", Review of International Studies, 36(1), pp.132~132 (2010)
- Schultz D, "American Foreign Policy in the Age of Donald Trump", Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 17, pp.27~33 (2019)
- 이민규, "Containment with Selective Engagement: Biden’s Expected China Policy", 세계지역연구논총, 39(1), pp.345~380 (2021), 한국세계지역학회[DOI]
- 이상수, "The Trump Administration’s NEGOTIATION STRATEGY Towards the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: South Korea’s Response", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 6(1), pp.10~17 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 이상수, "Paradox of COVID-19 Pandemic, Strengthening Neo-Liberalist's Way of GLOBAL GOVERNANCE Building to Overcome Vaccine Nationalism's Politics", Regulations, 6(2), pp.1~9 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 김병남, "아프가니스탄 이슬람 반군 지원 미국의 공격적 비밀공작 분석", 한국중동학회논총, 33(3), pp.71~99 (2013), 한국중동학회[DOI]
- Salt A, "Transformation and the War in Afghanistan", Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(1), pp.98~126 (2018)
- 유재광, "호주의 대중국 대결외교-복합적 위협인식과 과잉 위험회피를 중심으로-", 동서연구, 33(4), pp.99~126 (2021), 동서문제연구원[DOI]
- Clarke M, "Widening the Net : China's Anti-terror Laws and Human Rights in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region", The International Journal of Human Rights, 14(4), pp.542~558 (2010)
- 이상수, "Biden Administration’s APPROACHES to Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 6(3), pp.9~16 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Choi Won-sang, "A Study on the Overcoming of the Asymmetry of the Korea-U.S. Alliance: Focusing on the Trump Administration’s Security, Economic and MILITARY Alliance Policies", International Journal of Military Affairs, 4(2), pp.1~9 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- 이상수, "Human Rights DISASTER: China's Human Rights Policy toward North Korean Refugees", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 6(1), pp.8~15 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
