A SMART POWER Strategies to the Peace Process on the Korean Peninsula
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The Purpose of this article is to analyze the smart power strategy to the peace process on the Korean Peninsula and to suggest alternatives to build permanent peacebuilding efforts. This paper seeks to answer a key question regarding building a peace regime. What is South Korea’s smart power strategy for the peace regime building on the Korean Peninsula? Simultaneously, this paper also analyzes various South Korea’s domestic opinions over the North Korean nuclear issues. Method: This study analyzed ROK's Smart power strategies toward peace regime building on the Korean Pe-ninsula. Smart Power means developing an integrated strategy, resource base, and tool kit to achieve objectives, drawing on both hard(military muscle, economic might) and soft power(economic aid, sharing culture). It is an approach that underscores the necessity of a strong military but also invests heavily in alliances, partnerships, and institutions at all levels to expand the state's influence and establish the legitimacy of the action. Results: The ROK’s smart power strategies to the peace process are as follows. First, in terms of using alliance, South Korea has to call for the U.S to foster a peace regime building on the Korean Peninsula while cooperating with the Biden administration's democratic principle and ideology. Second, in terms of using partnership, South Korea has to induce China to put pressure on the DPRK to abandon nuclear weapons. Third, in terms of using institutions, ROK and DPRK have to transform the current 9/19 inter-Korean military agreement of the initial operational arms control into systemic arms control through early notification of mutual military training. Conclusion: The essential components of smart power are using alliances, partnerships, and institutions, etc. In this context, South Korea has all the necessary elements of the ROK-US alliance and ROK-China economic partnership, and 9.19 inter-Korean military agreement. In the long and bumpy road of the peace regime building process, it needs strategic optimism in pushing ahead smart power strategies but in building defense posture, they need to be a strategic pessimist.
Abstract
Purpose: The Purpose of this article is to analyze the smart power strategy to the peace process on the Korean Peninsula and to suggest alternatives to build permanent peacebuilding efforts. This paper seeks to answer a key question regarding building a peace regime. What is South Korea’s smart power strategy for the peace regime building on the Korean Peninsula? Simultaneously, this paper also analyzes various South Korea’s domestic opinions over the North Korean nuclear issues. Method: This study analyzed ROK's Smart power strategies toward peace regime building on the Korean Pe-ninsula. Smart Power means developing an integrated strategy, resource base, and tool kit to achieve objectives, drawing on both hard(military muscle, economic might) and soft power(economic aid, sharing culture). It is an approach that underscores the necessity of a strong military but also invests heavily in alliances, partnerships, and institutions at all levels to expand the state's influence and establish the legitimacy of the action. Results: The ROK’s smart power strategies to the peace process are as follows. First, in terms of using alliance, South Korea has to call for the U.S to foster a peace regime building on the Korean Peninsula while cooperating with the Biden administration's democratic principle and ideology. Second, in terms of using partnership, South Korea has to induce China to put pressure on the DPRK to abandon nuclear weapons. Third, in terms of using institutions, ROK and DPRK have to transform the current 9/19 inter-Korean military agreement of the initial operational arms control into systemic arms control through early notification of mutual military training. Conclusion: The essential components of smart power are using alliances, partnerships, and institutions, etc. In this context, South Korea has all the necessary elements of the ROK-US alliance and ROK-China economic partnership, and 9.19 inter-Korean military agreement. In the long and bumpy road of the peace regime building process, it needs strategic optimism in pushing ahead smart power strategies but in building defense posture, they need to be a strategic pessimist.
참고문헌 (21)
- Tong Z, "China's Dilemmas over Stalled North Korean Denuclearization Talks", Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 3(1), pp.157~158 (2020)
- 이상수, "The Strategies of ROK’s DEFENSE REFORM with Special Reference to the Peace Process and Arms Control", International Journal of Military Affairs, 5(2), pp.1~8 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Gallarotti GM, "Smart Power: Definitions, Importance, and Effectiveness", Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(3), pp.248~249 (2014)
- Yu S, "The New Government’s North Korean Strategy and the Resolution of the Nuclear Crisis", Korean Observations on Foreign Relations, 11(1), pp.140~141 (2009)
- Cho H, "The Biden Administration's Policy on the Korean Peninsula and ROK's Response", Online Series, 20(29), pp.5~6 (2020)
- 조성구, "The United Nation's Response Strategy for North KOREA's DENUCLEARIZATION", International Journal of Military Affairs, 3(2), pp.20~28 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Choi Won-sang, "A Study on the Overcoming of the Asymmetry of the Korea-U.S. Alliance: Focusing on the Trump Administration’s Security, Economic and MILITARY Alliance Policies", International Journal of Military Affairs, 4(2), pp.1~9 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- Iain Watson, "South Korea's State-led Soft Power Strategies: Limits on Inter-Korean Relations", Asian Journal of Political Science, 20(3), pp.304~325 (2013), 아시아연구소
- 조성구, "Terrorism CRISIS on Northeast Asia", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 5(1), pp.35~42 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Moon W, "Initiating a Cooperative Denuclearization Effort with North Korea", The Nonproliferation Review, 26(5-6), pp.613~634 (2019)
- Dalton T, "From Deterrence to Cooperative Security on the Korean Peninsula", Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 3(1), pp.146~147 (2020)
- Graham T, "Reducing Nuclear Dangers on the Korean Peninsula: Bilateral Versus Multilateral Approaches", Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(1), pp.354~355 (2019)
- Tatsujiro S, "On Recent Developments on the Korean Peninsula", Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(1), pp.374~375 (2019)
- Park Jong-tak, "A Study on the Use of MILLITARY Forces in the NORTH KOREAN Regime", International Journal of Military Affairs, 4(2), pp.18~24 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- Cha V, "What Do They Really Want?: Obama’s North Korea Conundrum", The Washington Quarterly, 32(4), pp.119~138 (2018)
- 이상수, "Evolution of Jangmadang and Marketization in North Korea: Focus on recalibrating South Korea’s Economic Policy towards the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea", The Korean Journal of Security Affairs, 23(1), pp.42~62 (2018), 국가안전보장문제연구소
- Lee D, "The Chinese Failure to Disarm North Korea: Geographical Proximity, U.S. Unipolarity, and Alliance Restraint", Contemporary Security Policy, 41(1), pp.591~592 (2020)
- Bruce W. Bennett, "Mutual Cooperation Among South Korea, The United States and China to Deal with North Korean Crises", The Korean Journal of Security Affairs, 12(1), pp.49~81 (2007), 국가안전보장문제연구소
- Bush RC, "North Korea’s Nuclear and Missile Tests and the Six-party Talks: Where Do We Go from Here?" (2009), The Brookings Institute
- Shirk SL, "China: Fragile Superpower", pp.2007
- CSIS, "Commission on Smart Power: A Smarter, More Secure America the CSIS", ~ (2007)