본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Improving the Public Value in Government Program: The Case of Korean Government 3.0 Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This research aimed to analyze the Government 3.0. Case which has been implemented as a means of new paradigm of delivering public services. Specifically, we discussed the theoretical base of Government 3.0., and conducted quantitative & qualitative analysis through the survey and interview with experts. Lastly, we conducted Focused Group Interview(FGI). Through analysis, we tried to describe the concept, operation and evaluation of the Government 3.0. Based on the analysis and discussion, we aimed at recognizing the concept, key values, issues and solutions of Government 3.0. To recommend ways to realize the public value through improved Government 3.0. In specific, the recommendations were made in following sectors: improving the participation of the citizen, reinforcing the public relations of public policy, enhancing the performance evaluation, and facilitating cooperation.

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the Government 3.0. Case which has been implemented as a means of new paradigm of delivering public services. Specifically, we discussed the theoretical base of Government 3.0., and conducted quantitative & qualitative analysis through the survey and interview with experts. Lastly, we conducted Focused Group Interview(FGI). Through analysis, we tried to describe the concept, operation and evaluation of the Government 3.0. Based on the analysis and discussion, we aimed at recognizing the concept, key values, issues and solutions of Government 3.0. To recommend ways to realize the public value through improved Government 3.0. In specific, the recommendations were made in following sectors: improving the participation of the citizen, reinforcing the public relations of public policy, enhancing the performance evaluation, and facilitating cooperation.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Cho Sung Han., "Theoretical Paradox and Inappropriate Process = Fallacy of New Public Management Reform in Korea", Korean Policy Review, 9(1), pp.5~27 (2000)
  2. Cho Sung Hoon, "A Study on the Aggregation of Multi-Experts Priorities Using Compatibility in the AHP", Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 23(4), pp.131~140 (1998)
  3. 최성욱, "거버넌스 개념에 대한 비판적 고찰-한국행정학계의 거버넌스 연구경향 분석", 정부학연구, 10(1), pp.239~261 (2004), 정부학연구소
  4. Corrin, Amber., "Can New Mobile Government Plans Overcome Old Problems?" (2012), Federal Computer Week
  5. Denhardt, R. B., "The New Public Service: Serving, not steering" (2003), ME Sharpe
  6. ROBERTB.DENHARDT, "THE NEW PUBLIC SERVICE: AN APPROACH TO REFORM", International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), pp.3~10 (2003), 한국행정학회
  7. Denhardt, R. B., "The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering" (2007), ME Sharpe
  8. Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments?, "Fox, W. F.", World Bank, ~ (2006)
  9. 금창호, "지방3.0의 효율적 추진체제 설계를 위한 시론", 지방행정연구, 27(3), pp.41~64 (2013), 한국지방행정연구원
  10. Han Eun Young., "Features and Implications of the British Open Data Policy", Journal of Information and Communication Broadcasting Policy, 26(23), pp.1~24 (2014)
  11. Gov3.0: Conception and Promote Future e-Government Strategies, "Hwang Jong Seong.", The Korea Association for Policy Studies, ~ (2013)
  12. Ingraham, P. W., "Politics and Merit : Can They Meet in a Public Service Model?", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 8(2), pp.7~19 (1988)
  13. Jessop, B., "The New Politics of British Local Governance" (2000), St. Martin Press
  14. Ji Eun Hee., "Government 2.0: Public Services in Web 2.0", KALI Distinction Information Review, 44 (2007)
  15. Jun, J. S., "The Limits of Post-New Public Management and Beyond", Public Administration Review, 69(1), pp.161~165 (2009)
  16. Kaletsky, A., "Capitalism 4. 0 : The Birth of a New Economy" (2010), Culture & Story
  17. Kelly, G., "Creating Public Value : An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform" (2002), Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office
  18. A Study on the Effect of Implementing indoor locating technology-based Safety System of Seoulmetro, "Kim Bong-Seok", The Korean Society for Railway, ~ (2014)
  19. 김순은, "주민행복과 창조적인 지방정부3.0의 이론적 토대", 지방행정연구, 27(3), pp.3~40 (2013), 한국지방행정연구원
  20. A study on the factors determining the influence of Korea NGO, "Kim Tae Ryong.", The Korean Association for Policy Studies, 109~128 (2002)
  21. Kim Tae Ryong., "Public Administration Theory" (2007), daeyounng
  22. The direction of future technologies of the Web 3. 0 era, "Kim Taek Cheon.", Korea Internet & Security Agency, ~ (2009)
  23. Kitchen, H., "Public Service Delivery. Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series" (2005), The World Bank
  24. Kwon Gi-Heon., "The Theories of Policy Science" (2007), Parkyoungsa
  25. Kwon Gi-Heon., "E-Governemnt & E-Strategy : Explaining the Successful Korean E-Government Model and Strategie" (2007), Parkyoungsa
  26. Kwon Gi-Heon., "The Public Administration Lecture" (2014), Parkyoungsa
  27. 이병종, "신공공서비스론의 관점에서 경찰서비스의 개혁방안", 한국공안행정학회보, 19(4), pp.301~338 (2010), 한국공안행정학회
  28. 이명석, "네트워크 거버넌스와 정부의 역할: 복잡계이론을 중심으로", 국정관리연구, 6(1), pp.1~31 (2011), 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원
  29. Lee Seung Jong, "Happy People and Government 3. 0 : Understanding and Application" (2013), Hakjisa
  30. ICT Project for Data Power Country, , National Information Society Agency, ~ (2013)
  31. National ICT Policy and Strategy for the Creation of the ICT Industry, , National Information Society Agency, ~ (2014)
  32. Open data road map for the UK 2015, , Open data Institute, ~ (2014)
  33. Park Yoon Jeong., "Practices and implications of Web 3. 0 Information Services", 21(20), pp.25~43 (2009)
  34. Park Yoon Jin., "Capitalism 4.0.", Sang-Jang, 4, pp.129~131 (2012)
  35. Peter, deleon., "Democracy and the Policy Sciences" (1997), State University of New York Press
  36. Rhodes, R., "The New Governance : Governing Without Government", Political Studies, 44(4), pp.652~667 (1996)
  37. An Exploratory Study on the future of e-government model : Focusing on the values and concepts of e-government 3. 0 for sustainable development, "Ryu Kwang Taek", The Korean Association for Policy Studies, 319~340 (2012)
  38. Tapscott, D., "Wikinomics : How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything" (2006), Seoul : 21century books
  39. Terry, L. D., "Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement", Public Administration Review, 58(3), pp.194~200 (1998)
  40. Yoo Hye Rim, "The Evolution of Web Services Change on Social Network Service", Korean Society for Internet Information, 11(3), pp.52~62 (2010)
  41. Yoon Mi Young., "Big Data Analysis Strategies and Implications of Major Countries", Science Technology Policy, 23(3) (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)