A Critical Review of Theory and Value in Public Administration and Implications for the Future
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to critically review and compare major theories and values in public administration and to suggest theoretical implications for future. The results are summarized as follows. First, traditional public administration focused on whether or not administration should be separated from politics; administration is a field of politics. The core values are efficiency, scientific management, administrative principles, and democracy. Second, modern public administration discussed the critiques and self-reflection on traditional public administration. The essential values are social equity, fairness, justice, responsiveness, new perspective, and legitimacy. Finally, current public administration emphasized inefficiency of public agencies and bureaucracy; criticized the modern and rationalistic approach and suggested the postmodern approach. The core values contradict each other—one is values of market oriented reform—efficiency, decentralization, deregulation, and contracting out; the other is values of deconstructing rationality and modernity. But no one knows the future theory. But it is certain that the next public administration theory will give better understanding and a good answer for epistemological and practical issues and problems in the public administration field.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to critically review and compare major theories and values in public administration and to suggest theoretical implications for future. The results are summarized as follows. First, traditional public administration focused on whether or not administration should be separated from politics; administration is a field of politics. The core values are efficiency, scientific management, administrative principles, and democracy. Second, modern public administration discussed the critiques and self-reflection on traditional public administration. The essential values are social equity, fairness, justice, responsiveness, new perspective, and legitimacy. Finally, current public administration emphasized inefficiency of public agencies and bureaucracy; criticized the modern and rationalistic approach and suggested the postmodern approach. The core values contradict each other—one is values of market oriented reform—efficiency, decentralization, deregulation, and contracting out; the other is values of deconstructing rationality and modernity. But no one knows the future theory. But it is certain that the next public administration theory will give better understanding and a good answer for epistemological and practical issues and problems in the public administration field.
참고문헌 (67)
- Appleby, P, "Government is Different, In Classics of Public Administration", pp.131~135 (1945), Thomson Learning
- Appleby, P, "Policy and Administration" (1949), University of Alabama Press
- Behn, R. D, "The New Public Management Paradigm and the Search for Democratic Accountability", International Public Management Journal, 1(2), pp.131~164 (1998)
- Boston, J, "Reshaping the State : New Zealand’s Bureaucratic Revolution" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Bowman, J. S, "The Profession of Public Administration. An Ethics Edge in Introductory Textbooks?", Public Administration Review, 61, pp.194~205 (2001)
- Buchanan, J, "The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundation of Constitutional Democracy" (1962), The University of Michigan Press
- Dahl, R. A, "Science of Public Administration : Three Problems", Public Administration Review, 7, pp.1~11 (1947)
- DeLeon, L, "The Political Theory of Reinvention", Public Administration Review, 60(2), pp.89~97 (2000)
- Denhardt, R. B, "Theories of Public", pp.2004, Wads worth
- Denhardt, R. B, "New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering", Public Administration Review, 60(6), pp.549~559 (2000)
- Dewey, J, "The Public and Its problems" (1985), Swallow Press
- Farmer, D. J, "The Language of Public Administration, Bureaucracy, Modernity, and Postmoderniny" (1995), The University of Alabama Press
- Fox, C. J, "Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse" (1995), Sage Publications
- Franklin, J. H, "The Moral Legacy of the Founding Fathers, In Race and History: Selected Essays 1938-1988", pp.153~162 (1989), Louisiana State University
- Frederickson, H. G, "Toward a New Public Administration, In Classics of Public Administration", pp.315~327 (1971), Thomson Learning
- Frederickson, H. G, "Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 56(3), pp.263~270 (1996)
- Frederickson, H. G, "The Public Administration Theory Primer" (2003), Westview Press
- Fry, B, "Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo" (1989), Chatham House Publishers
- Gilman, S. C, "Public Service Ethics : A Global Dialogue", Public Administration Review, 56, pp.517~524 (1996)
- Goodnow, F. J, "Politics and Administration: A Study in Government" (1900), Russell & Russell
- Gortner, J. F, "Values and Ethics, In Handbook of Administrative Ethics", pp.373~390 (1994), Marcel Dekker
- Gulick, L, "Papers on the Science of Administration" (1937), Institute of Public Administration
- Harmon, M. M, "The Simon", Waldo Debate : A Review and Update, 1989, pp.(Winter), 437~451
- Harmon, M. M, "Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government" (1995), Sage
- Hart, D. K, "Social Equity, Justice, and the Equitable Administrator", Public Administration Review, 34, pp.3~10 (1974)
- Hodgetts, J. E, "Implicit Values in the Administration of Public Affairs", Canadian Public Administration, 24, pp.471~483 (1982)
- Hood, C, "A Public Management for All Seasons?", Public Administration, 69, pp.3~19 (1991)
- Kaboolian, L, "The New Public Management", Public Administration Review, 58(3), pp.189~193 (1998)
- Kaufman, H, "Administration Decentralization and Political Power", Public Administration Review, (January-February), pp.72~102 (1969)
- Kernaghan, K, "The Post-Bureaucratic Organization and Public Service Values", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, pp.91~104 (2000)
- Kettl, D, "The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance" (2000), Brookings Institution
- Lowi, T. J, "Legitimizing Public Administration: A Disturbed Dissent", Public Administration Review, 53(3), pp.261~264 (1993)
- Lynn, L. E Jr, "Studying Governance and Public Management :Why? How?, In Governance and Performance : New Perspectives" (1999), Georgetown University Press
- Lynn, L. E Jr, "Improving Governance : A New Logic for Empirical Research" (2001), Georgetown University Press
- Marini, F, "Toward a New Public Administration : The Minnowbrook Perspective" (1971), Chandler
- McSwite, O. C, "Legitimacy in Public Administration : A Discourse Analysis" (1997), Sage
- Mikesell, J. L, "Fiscal Administration : Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector", pp.2003, Wadsworth
- National Performance Review, "From Red Tape to Results : Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less" (1993), U. S. Government Printing Office
- Niskanen, W, "Bureaucracy and Representative Government" (1971), Aldine de Gruyter
- Osborne, D, "Reinventing Government" (1992), Addison-Wesley
- Ostrom, V, "The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration" (1974), The University of Alabama Press
- O’Toole, L, "Multiorganizational Policy Implementation : Some Limitations and Possibilities for Rational-Choice Contributions, In Games in Hierarchies and Networks : Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions" (1993), Westview Press
- Rohr, J. A, "To Run a Constitution : The Legitimacy of the Administrative State" (1965), University Press of Kansas
- Tullock, G, "The Politics of Bureaucracy" (1965), Public Affairs Press
- Rawl, J, "A Theory of Justice" (1971), Belknap Press
- Shafritz, J. M, "Classics of Public Administration", pp.2004, Wads worth
- Simon, H, "The Proverbs of Administration", Public Administration Review, 6, pp.53~67 (1946)
- Simon, H, "Development of Theory of Democratic Administration : Replies and Comments", American Political Science Review, 46(2), pp.494~496 (1952)
- Spicer, M. W, "Value Pluralism and Its Implications for American Public Administration", the 14th Annual Conference of the Public Administration Theory Network (2001)
- Spicer, M, "Legitimacy, History, and Logic : Public Administration and the Constitution", Public Administration Review, 53(3), pp.239~246 (1993)
- Stillman II. R. J, "Preface To Public Administration: A Search For Themes and Direction" (1991), St. Martin’s Press
- Stivers, C, "Toward a Feminist Perspective in Public Administration Theory", Women and Politics, 10(4) (1990)
- Stivers, C, "Administration versus Management : A Reading from beyond the Boundaries", Administration & Society, 35(2), pp.210~230 (2003)
- Taylor, F. W, "The Principles of Scientific Management" (1967), W.W. Norton & Company
- Tocqueville, A. D, "Democracy in America. Vol. 1 and 2" (1945), Vintage
- Tullock, G, "The Politics of Bureaucracy" (1965), Public Affairs Press
- Van Wart, M, "Changing Public Sector Values" (1998), Garland Publishing
- Waldo, D, "The Administrative State" (1948), Ronald Press
- Waldo, D, "Development of Theory of Democratic Administration", American Political Science Review, 46(1), pp.81~103 (1952)
- Wamsley, G, "On the Problems of Discovering What’s Reality New in the Public Administration", Administration and Society, 8, pp.385~400 (1976)
- Wamsley, G, "Refounding Democratic Public Administration" (1996), Sage Publications
- Weber, M, "The Theory of Social and Economic Organization" (1947), The Free Press
- Weschler, L, "Learning about Theory through the Path of Reflective Experience", Journal of Public Administration Education, 3(3), pp.383~389 (1997)
- White, L. D, "Introduction to the Study of Public Administration" (1926), Prentice Hall
- Willoughby, W. F, "Principles of Public Administration" (1927), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Wilson, W, "Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly. 2, In Classics of Public Administration", pp.1887, Brooks
- Wreger, C. D, "The Father of Scientific Management: Myth and Reality" (1991), Business One Irwin