본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Trends in the American Study of Public Administration: What Do They Mean for Korean Public Administration?

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

The study of public administration in the United States is torn between a desire to be scientific and universal without acknowledging the uniqueness of political-administrative systems around the world on the one hand and a need to provide understanding and adequate descriptions of reality on the other hand. In this article features of American society and government are described and related to trends in the study of public administration in the United States. It is clear that the universal challenges of contemporary government can only be met when addressed in the national context. The American and Korean study of public administration have much to learn from each other.

Abstract

The study of public administration in the United States is torn between a desire to be scientific and universal without acknowledging the uniqueness of political-administrative systems around the world on the one hand and a need to provide understanding and adequate descriptions of reality on the other hand. In this article features of American society and government are described and related to trends in the study of public administration in the United States. It is clear that the universal challenges of contemporary government can only be met when addressed in the national context. The American and Korean study of public administration have much to learn from each other.

참고문헌 (81)

  1. Arora, R. K, "Indian public administration: Institutions and issues" (1995), New Delhi: Wishwa Prakashan.
  2. Bingham, R. D, "Mainstream” public administration over time: A topical content analysis of Public Administration Review", Public Administration Review, 54(2), pp.204~208 (1994)
  3. Box,R.C, "Making a difference: Progressive values in public administration Armonk" (2008), NY: M. E. Sharpe
  4. Burns,J.P, "Explaining civil service reform in Asia" (2007), New York: Palgrave MacMillan
  5. Caldwell,L.K, "Public administration and the universities: A half-century of development", Public Administration Review, 25(1), pp.52~60 (1965)
  6. Campbell,B.C, "The growth of American government: Governance from the Cleveland era to the present" (1995), Bloomington: Indiana University Press
  7. Candler,G.G, "The evolution of public administration in Australia, Brazil and Canada", Canadian Public Administration, 49(3), pp.334~349 (2006)
  8. "Epistemic community or tower of Babel? Theoretical diffusion in public administration", The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(3), pp.294~306 (2008)
  9. Chung,S.H, "Reading Korean public administration: An application of Lacanian four discourses", International Journal of Public Administration, 30, pp.1343~1369 (2007)
  10. Cotton,J., "Politics and policy in the new Korean State: From Roh Tae-Woo to Kim Young-Sam" (1995), New York: St. Martin’s Press
  11. De Zwart,F, "Administrative practice and rational inquiry in postmodern public administration theory", Administration & Society, 34(5), pp.482~498 (2002)
  12. Farmer,D.J, "Public administration discourse: A matter of style?", Administration & Society, 31(3), pp.299~320 (1999)
  13. Frederickson, H. G, "The public administration theory primer" (2003), Boulder, CO: Westview Press
  14. Fry, B. C, "Mastering public administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo" (2008), Washington, DC: CQ Press
  15. Gill, J, "Public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), pp.157~199 (2000)
  16. Goodsell,C.T, "The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic" (2004), Washington, DC: CQ Press
  17. Gore,A, "Creating a Government that Works better and Costs Less", New York: Times Books, ~ (1993)
  18. Hahm, S. D, "After development: The transformation of the Korean presidency and bureaucracy" (1997), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  19. Henry, N, "Understanding excellence in the master of public administration degree", Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration, ~ (2008)
  20. Hoffer,W.H, "To enlarge the machinery of government: Congressional debates and the growth of the American state, 1858-1891" (2007), Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
  21. Hofstede, G, "Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind" (2005), New York: McGraw-Hill
  22. James,W, "Pragmatism" (1975), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  23. Jung,Y, "Public administration in the modern state" (2001), Seoul: Bobmunsa Publishing Co
  24. Jung, Y., "Stateness in transition: The Korean case in comparative perspective", Zeitschrift für Staats-und Europawissenschaften, 3(3), pp.410~433 (2005)
  25. Kickert, W. J. M, "The modern state and its study: New administrative sciences in a changing Europe and United States" (1999), Edward Elgar
  26. 김대건, "한국행정연구의 연구자 특성과 거버넌스 연구영역 변화분석: 한국행정학보를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 41(1), pp.227~245 (2007), 한국행정학회
  27. Kim,Y, "The South Korean civil service system", pp.249~280 (2001), Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar
  28. Formal rational choice theory: A cumulative science of politics, "Lalman, D", The American Political Science Association., 77~104 (1993)
  29. Lan, Z, "A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: An empirical test", Administration & Society, 32(2), pp.138~165 (2000)
  30. Lasch,C, "The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations" (1978), New York: W.W. Norton
  31. Lee,H.-B, "Korea: Time, change, and administration" (1968), Honolulu: East-West Center
  32. Lee, K, "Between amateur government and career civil service: The American administrative elite in cross-time and cross-national perspective", Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 201~222 (2005)
  33. Liu,J.T.C, "Eleventh-century Chinese bureaucrats: Some historical classifications and behavioral types", Administrative Science Quarterly, 4(2), pp.207~226 (1959)
  34. Luton,L.S, "Deconstructing public administration empiricism", Administration & Society, 39(4), pp.527~544 (2007)
  35. Martin,D.W, "Deja vu: French antecedents of American public administration", Public Administration Review, 47(3), pp.297~303 (1987)
  36. Meier,K.J, "Public administration and the myth of positivism: The antiChrist’s view", Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(4), pp.650~668 (2005)
  37. Meier, K. J, "Deconstructing Larry Luton: Or what time is the next train to Reality Junction?", Administration & Society, 39(6), pp.786~796 (2007)
  38. Miewald,R.D, "The origins of Wilson’s thought:The German tradition and the organic state.In Jack Rabin and James S.Bowman(Eds.),Politics and administration:Woodrow Wilson and American Public Administration(pp", pp.17~30 (1984), New York: Marcel Dekker
  39. Munro,W.B, "The government of the United States, national, state and local" (1919), New York: MacMillan
  40. Ostrom,V, "The intellectual crisis in American public administration" (1974), University, AL: The University of Alabama Press
  41. O’Sullivan.J.L, "Motto used in the United States Magazine and Democratic Review, published between 1837-1859" (1837), London: SAGE Publications
  42. Raadschelders,J.C.N, , pp.4~39 (1998), Den Haag: VNG-Uitgeverij
  43. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Understanding government through differentiated integration in the study of public administration", pp.329~356 (2003), Amsterdam: JAI Press
  44. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Government: A public administration perspective" (2003), M. E. Sharpe
  45. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "A model of the arena of PA-theory: Bogey man, doctor’s bag and", or artist’s medium, 2004, pp.26(1), 46~78
  46. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Government and public administration: Challenges to and need for connecting knowledge", Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(4), pp.602~627 (2005)
  47. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Abraham Lincoln’s presidency as the foundation of the modern administrative state? Review of Team of rivals: The political genius of Abraham Lincoln by Doris Kearns Goodwin", Public Administration Review, 675, pp.943~946 (2007)
  48. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Is American public administration dissociating from historical context?", Paper prepared for the Minnowbrook III conference (2008), Lake Placid, NY
  49. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Understanding government: Four intellectual traditions in the study of public administration", Public Administration (UK), 86(3), pp.925~949 (2008)
  50. Raadschelders, J. C. N., "Identity without boundaries: Public administration’s canon(s) of integration", Administration & Society, ~
  51. Riggs,F, "Comments in discussion on methodology in public administration theory", Theory and practice of public administration. Philadelphia: The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 8 (1968)
  52. Rhodes, R. A. W, "The state of public administration: A professional history, 1970-1995", Public Administration, 73(1), pp.1~15 (1995)
  53. Ro,C, "Public administration and the Korean transformation: Concepts, policies, and value conflicts" (1993), West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press
  54. Rodgers, R, "Defining the boundaries of public administration: Undisciplined mongrels versus disciplined purists", Public Administration Review, 60(5), pp.435~443 (2000)
  55. Rosenau,P.M, "Postmodernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions" (1992), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
  56. Rosenthal, U, (1987), the Netherlands: Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink
  57. Rosenthal, U, (1996), Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom H. D. Tjeenk Willink
  58. Rouban,Luc, "Political-administrative relations", pp.263~278 (2007), New York: Palgrave MacMillan
  59. Rutgers,M.R, "Het Gulden Boekje uit de Nederlandse Bestuurskunde: Schets der Regeerkunde, L. P. Van der Spiegel, 1786" (2005), Delft:Eburon
  60. Saunier,P.-Y, "Les voyages municipaux américains en Europe 1900-1940: Une piste d’histoire transnationale [Travels of American local government officials in Europe: a transnational historical trail", Yearbook of European administrative history, 15, pp.267~288 (2003)
  61. Scott,J.C, "Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed" (1998), New Haven: Yale University Press
  62. Seelig, G, (1907), Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
  63. Self,P, "Administrative theories and politics" (1979), London: George Allen & Unwin
  64. Shields,P.M, "Rediscovering the taproot: Is classical pragmatism the route to renew public administration?", Public Administration Review, 68(2), pp.205~221 (2008)
  65. Simon,H.A, "Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization" (1957), New York: The Free Press
  66. Simon,H.A, "Development of theory of democratic administration: Replies and comments", American Political Science Review, 46(2), pp.494~496 (1952)
  67. Stallings, R. A, "Public administration research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984", Public Administration Review, 48(1), pp.580~587 (1988)
  68. Starbuck,W.H, "The production of knowledge: The challenge of social science research" (2006), Oxford: Oxford University Press
  69. Stern,R.W, "India’s Westminster system", pp.13~35 (2005), Sydney: University of New South Wales Press
  70. Streib, G, "Public administration research from a practitioner perspective", Public Administration Review, 61(5), pp.515~525 (2001)
  71. Thoreau,H.D, "Civil Disobedience" (2008), Fitchburg, MA: Quill Pen Classics
  72. Van Poelje,G.A, "Hedendaags gemeenterecht (Contemporary municipal law)" (1914), s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff
  73. Waldo,D, "Development of theory of democratic administration", American Political Science Review, 46(1), pp.81~103 (1952), 81-103.
  74. "Development of theory of democratic administration: Replies and comments", American Political Science Review, 46(2), pp.500~503 (1952), 500-503.
  75. "Public administration", Journal of Politics, 30(2), pp.443~479 (1968)
  76. Wamsley, G. L, "The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration" (1973), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
  77. Westney,D.E, "and innovation: The transfer of western organizational patterns to Meiji Japan", Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1987)
  78. Wills,G, "A necessary evil: A history of American distrust of government" (1999), New York: Simon & Schuster
  79. Wilson,E.O, "Consilience: The unity of knowledge" (1998), New York: Alfred A. Knopf
  80. Woo-Cummings,M, "The Korean bureaucratic state: Historical legacies and comparative perspectives", pp.141~169 (1995), New York: St. Martin’s Press
  81. Yankelovich,D, "Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world" (1991), , NY: Syracuse University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)