Dissimilar Public Management Paradigms, Similar Adoption: Finding an Approach Contingent on Policy Goals
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Several management paradigms—traditional public administration, new public administration, new public management (NPM), and networked governance—have been leaders in practice and in the academic world of public administration at different time periods. However all these management paradigms have a negative aspect in common—a “one-size-fits-all” approach to government reforms. This study tries to overcome this approach, utilizing a contingent method. Each of the four paradigms has been suggested for adoption in one or two areas of different policy types based on a two-by-two table with the dimensions of high and low with respect to market mechanisms and high and low on the explicitness of the politics-administration dichotomy. The study proposes that traditional public administration would be the appropriate choice in the areas of redistributive and constituent policy. New public administration would work well for regulatory policy, whereas networked governance and NPM (customeroriented practices) would be the right choice in the arena of distributive policy.
Abstract
Several management paradigms—traditional public administration, new public administration, new public management (NPM), and networked governance—have been leaders in practice and in the academic world of public administration at different time periods. However all these management paradigms have a negative aspect in common—a “one-size-fits-all” approach to government reforms. This study tries to overcome this approach, utilizing a contingent method. Each of the four paradigms has been suggested for adoption in one or two areas of different policy types based on a two-by-two table with the dimensions of high and low with respect to market mechanisms and high and low on the explicitness of the politics-administration dichotomy. The study proposes that traditional public administration would be the appropriate choice in the areas of redistributive and constituent policy. New public administration would work well for regulatory policy, whereas networked governance and NPM (customeroriented practices) would be the right choice in the arena of distributive policy.
참고문헌 (61)
- Ackroyd, S, "Public management reform in the UK and its consequences for professional organization", Public Administration, 85(1), pp.9~26 (2007)
- Advancing a public service ethos, "Aldridge, R.", New Local Government Network, ~ (2002)
- Alford, J., "Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public Management", American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), pp.130~148 (2008)
- Appleby, P., "Policy and administration" (1949), University of Alabama Press
- Barzelay, M., "The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue" (2001), University of California Press
- Beetham, D., "Bureaucracy" (1987), Open University Press
- Behn, R. D., "The new public management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability", International Public Management Journal, 1(2), pp.131~164 (1998)
- Bevir, M., "Public governance. Vol. 1:Theories of Governance" (2007), Sage
- Dahl, R., "The science of public administration: Three problems", Public Administration Review, 7(1), pp.1~11 (1947)
- Daley, D., "Controlling the bureaucracy among the states", Administration and Society, 15(4), pp.475~488 (1984)
- deLeon, L., "The political theory of reinvention", Public Administration Review, 60(2), pp.89~97 (2000)
- Denhardt, R. B., "Public administration: An action orientation" (1999), Harcourt Brace
- ROBERTB.DENHARDT, "THE NEW PUBLIC SERVICE: AN APPROACH TO REFORM", International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), pp.3~10 (2003), 한국행정학회
- Dunleavy, P., "New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), pp.467~494 (2005)
- Epstein, D., "Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Evans, J. W., "A new administrative ethic? Attitudes of public managers and students", Public Personnel Management, 10(1), pp.132~139 (1981)
- Forester, J., "Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through", Public Administration Review, 44(1), pp.23~31 (1984)
- Frederickson, H. G., "Social equity and public administration: Origins, developments, and applications" (2010), M. E. Sharpe
- Goodnow, F. J., "Politics and administration" (1900), Macmillan
- Goodsell, C. T., "Looking once again at human service bureaucracy", Journal of Politics, 43(3), pp.763~778 (1981)
- Goss, S., "Making local governance work" (2001), Macmillan
- Guy, M. E., "Minnowbrook II: Conclusions", Public Administration Review, 49(2), pp.219~220 (1989)
- Hood, C., "Regulation inside government: Waste-watchers, quality police and sleaze-busters" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Hood, C., "The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), pp.267~282 (2004)
- Jones, C., "Voices from the front line: State social workers and new labour", British Journal of Social Work, 31(4), pp.547~562 (2001)
- Jones, L. R., "Public management: Institutional renewal for the twenty-first century" (1999), Elsevier-JAI Press
- Jordan, A., "The rise of “new” policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government?", Political Studies, 53(3), pp.477~496 (2005)
- Kaboolian, L., "The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate", Public Administration Review, 58(3), pp.189~193 (1998)
- Keast, R., "Mixing state, market and network governance modes: The role of government in “crowded” policy domains", International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(1), pp.27~50 (2006)
- Kettl, D. F., "The transformation of governance" (2002), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Kickert, W. J. M., "Public governance in the Netherlands: An alternative to Anglo-American managerialism", Public Administration, 75(4), pp.731~753 (1997)
- 김주애, "Social Service Contracting-Out in Korea and Japan: Municipal Governments, Nonprofit Contractors, and Local Residents", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(1), pp.145~187 (2011), 서울대학교행정대학원
- Kim, Y., "Differentiation of bureaucracies and their responses to reform", PhD, pp.2007
- 김윤호, "The New Public Management(NPM) and Its Limitations", 한국거버넌스학회보, 17(3), pp.179~195 (2010), 한국거버넌스학회[DOI]
- Light, P., "Monitoring government inspectors general and the search for accountability" (1993), Brookings
- Long, N., "Power and administration", Public Administration Review, 9(3), pp.257~264 (1949)
- Lowi, T. J., "The four systems of policy, politics and choice", Public Administration Review, 32(4), pp.298~310 (1972)
- Lowi, T. J., "The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States" (1979), Norton
- Lowi, T. J., "Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences" (1985), University of California Press
- Marini, F., "Toward a new public administration" (1971), Chandler Publications
- McCool, D., "Subgovernments as determinants of political viability", Political Science Quarterly, 105(2), pp.269~294 (1990)
- Meier, K. J., "Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government", pp.1993, Brooks
- Moore, M., "Creating public value" (1995), Harvard University Press
- Pinchot, G., "The end of bureaucracy and the rise of intelligent organization" (1994), Berrett-Koehler
- Pollitt, C., "Decentralizing public service management" (1998), Macmillan
- Rainey, H. G., "Understanding and managing public organizations" (2003), Jossey-Bass
- Redford, E. S., "Democracy in the administrative state" (1969), Oxford University Press
- Rhodes, R. A. W., "From marketisation to diplomacy: It’s the mix that matters", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(2), pp.40~53 (1997)
- Rosenbloom, D. H., "Public administration" (1998), McGraw-Hill
- Syrett, V., "Implementing community care: The congruence of manager and practitioner cultures", Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 7(3), pp.154~169 (1997)
- Smith, R., "Focusing on public value: Something old and something new", pp.2003
- Spitzer, R. J., "The presidency and public policy: The four arenas of presidential power" (1983), University of Alabama Press
- Stoker, G., "Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?", American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), pp.41~57 (2006)
- Terry, L. D., "Why we should abandon the misconceived quest to reconcile public entrepreneurship with democracy", Public Administration Review, 53(4), pp.393~395 (1993)
- Thayer, F., "An end to hierarchy! An end to competition!" (1973), Viewpoints
- Thompson, F. J., "Reinventing government", Annual Review of Political Science, 1, pp.231~257 (1998)
- Waldo, D., "The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration" (1948), Ronald Press
- Waldo, D., "Public administration in a time of turbulence" (1971), Chandler Publications
- Walker, R. M., "How to abolish public housing: Implications and lessons from public management reform", Housing Studies, 16(5), pp.676~696 (2001)
- Using multiple informants in housing studies:Methodological issues and prescriptions for research, "Walker, R. M.", Asia-Pacific Network for Housing Research, ~ (2004)
- Wilson, W., "The study of administration", Political Science Quarterly, 56(2), pp.197~222 (1941)
