Administrative Reform:State and Democracy Revisited
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is a preliminary research on re-establishment of the roles of state bureaucracy to formulate democratic governance amid the shifts of public governance system from NPM to post-NPM. NPM reforms with emphasis on competition and result have brought changes in the legitimacy of democracy. The focus of legitimacy has turned procedural input basis into efficient output one. Due to the administrative reforms and changes in the nature of democracy the accountability of civil servants highlights individual public performance and disregards collective political control that is a critical legitimacy for input democracy. The transformation of the accountability tends to make public policies fragmented, finding little room to render them in favor of collective general interests. In order to resolve this problem, post-NPM reforms stressing collective public values, coordination and re-centralization of public servants emerge as suggested in neo-Weberian perspectives. These features are starting point of forging democratic governance and balanced democracy.
Abstract
This paper is a preliminary research on re-establishment of the roles of state bureaucracy to formulate democratic governance amid the shifts of public governance system from NPM to post-NPM. NPM reforms with emphasis on competition and result have brought changes in the legitimacy of democracy. The focus of legitimacy has turned procedural input basis into efficient output one. Due to the administrative reforms and changes in the nature of democracy the accountability of civil servants highlights individual public performance and disregards collective political control that is a critical legitimacy for input democracy. The transformation of the accountability tends to make public policies fragmented, finding little room to render them in favor of collective general interests. In order to resolve this problem, post-NPM reforms stressing collective public values, coordination and re-centralization of public servants emerge as suggested in neo-Weberian perspectives. These features are starting point of forging democratic governance and balanced democracy.
참고문헌 (30)
- Behn, R., "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" (2001), Brookings Institution Press
- Denhardt, R., "The new Public Service: Serving rather than Steering", Public Administration Review, 60(6), pp.549~559 (2000)
- Goldfinch, S., "Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform", Public Administration, 88(4), pp.1099~1115 (2010)
- Gualmini. E., "Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy : Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States", Public Administration, 86(1), pp.75~94 (2008)
- Halligan, J., "Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with Agencies in the Modern State" (2006), Edward Elgar
- Halligan, J., "The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management", pp.83~96 (2011), Ashgate
- Han, C., "The Changing Modes of Administrative Reform in South Korea", Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 50, pp.54~72 (2017)
- 한종희, "행정개혁과 거버넌스의 전략적 선택: 더 좋은 정부를 향한 시론적 연구", 한국행정논집, 27(4), pp.925~949 (2015), 한국정부학회
- Hood, C., "A Public Management for All Seasons?", Public Administration, 69(spring), pp.3~19 (1991)
- Hood, C., "The Politics of Public Service Bargains" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Kass, H., "Images and Identities in Public Administration", pp.113~130 (1990), Sage Publications
- Kooiman, J., "Social-Political Governance : Overview, Reflections and Design", Public Management Review, 1(1), pp.67~92 (1999)
- Laegreid, P., "Classics in Public Policy and Administration" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Meier, K., "Bureaucracy and Democracy : The Case for more Bureaucracy and less Democracy", Public Administration Review, 57(3), pp.193~199 (1997)
- O'Flynn, J., "From New Public Management to Public Value : Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), pp.353~366 (2007)
- Olsen, J. P., "Change and Continuity : an Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government", European Political Review, 1(1), pp.3~32 (2009)
- Olsen, J. P., "May it is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), pp.1~24 (2006)
- Osborne, S., "The New Public Governance", Public Management Review, 8(3), pp.377~387 (2006)
- O'Toole, L., "Theories of Democratic Governance Networks" (2007), Palgrave
- Peters, B. G., "Steering, Rowing, Drifting, or Sinking? Changing Patterns of Governance", Urban Research & Practice, 4(1), pp.5~12 (2001)
- Peters, B. G., "Bureaucracy and Democracy", Public Organization Review, 10(3), pp.209~222 (2010)
- Peters, B. G., "Still the Century of Bureaucracy? : The Roles of Public Servants", Public Policy and Administration, 30, pp.7~21 (2009)
- Pollitt, C., "Joined-up Government : a Survey", Political Studies Review, 1, pp.34~49 (2003)
- Pollitt, C., "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Pollitt, C., "Unbundled Government : A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos, and Contractualization" (2004), Routledge
- Stoker, C., "Public Value Management : A New Narrative for Networked Governance", American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), pp.3~19 (2006)
- Stever, J., "The End of Public Administration" (1988), Transaction Publishers
- Tholen, B., "Citizen Participation and Bureaucratization : the Participatory Turn Seen through a Weberian Lens", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), pp.585~603 (2015)
- Thynne, I., "Public Administration in Troubled Waters : Organizations, Management and a New Oceania", Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(2), pp.47~53 (1996)
- Wade, R., "Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialism" (1990), Princeton University Press