모어 화자와 한국어 학습자 말뭉치에서의 ‘은/는’과‘이/가’의 분포와 조사 선택 요인 분석
Analysis of distribution and selection factor of ‘은/는’ and ‘이/가’ in the native speaker corpus and the Korean learner’s corpus
1
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to investigate the usage of Korean particles ‘은/는’ and ‘이/가’ to find out the characteristics of interlanguage development of Korean language learners. Data includes 4,000 sentences which are extracted randomly from the native speaker corpus and Korean language learner corpus. Each sentence was coded with the factors of ‘ the head of a sentence’, ‘definiteness’, ‘animateness’, and ‘subjective’ in four groups- the native ‘이/가’, the native ‘은/는’, learner ‘이/가’ and the learner 은/는. The statistical analyses (Chi-square test and Binary logistic regression) were performed to prove the difference in distribution between native speakers and Korean learners. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the four groups. ‘은/는 is used in the circumstance of ‘the head of a sentence’, ‘definiteness’, more in the learners’ data rather than native speakers’ data. Also, it was also coded according to the types of predicates- verb, adjective, and copular. ‘은/는’ is used extensively in verbs and a copular especially in the learner’s corpus. Therefore it is believed that learner’s selection of ‘은/는’ and ‘이/가’ would be the indicative of the development of interlanguage development and can provide the explanations of learner’s errors of learning Korean.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the usage of Korean particles ‘은/는’ and ‘이/가’ to find out the characteristics of interlanguage development of Korean language learners. Data includes 4,000 sentences which are extracted randomly from the native speaker corpus and Korean language learner corpus. Each sentence was coded with the factors of ‘ the head of a sentence’, ‘definiteness’, ‘animateness’, and ‘subjective’ in four groups- the native ‘이/가’, the native ‘은/는’, learner ‘이/가’ and the learner 은/는. The statistical analyses (Chi-square test and Binary logistic regression) were performed to prove the difference in distribution between native speakers and Korean learners. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the four groups. ‘은/는 is used in the circumstance of ‘the head of a sentence’, ‘definiteness’, more in the learners’ data rather than native speakers’ data. Also, it was also coded according to the types of predicates- verb, adjective, and copular. ‘은/는’ is used extensively in verbs and a copular especially in the learner’s corpus. Therefore it is believed that learner’s selection of ‘은/는’ and ‘이/가’ would be the indicative of the development of interlanguage development and can provide the explanations of learner’s errors of learning Korean.
참고문헌 (26)
- 한국어 학습자 말뭉치 연구 및 구축 사업, "강현화", 국립국어원, ~ (2016)
- 고석주, "한국어 학습자 말뭉치와 오류 분석" (2004), 한국문화사
- 김미형, "조사 ‘은", 는’의 정체성- 문법서와 교재에서 어떻게 기술할 것인가 -, 2015, pp.(38), 5~45[DOI]
- 김수정, "소설 텍스트에서의 주어의 실현 양상 -박완서의 소설 ‘그 가을의 사흘 동안’을 중심으로-", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (64), pp.37~70 (2013), 한민족어문학회
- 김영일, "한국어교육을 위한 ‘은", 는’의 특성 재고찰, 2016, pp.(155), 217~263[DOI]
- 김정숙, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 조사 사용 오류 분석과 교육 방법 －‘-이", 가’와 ‘-은, 한국어교육, pp.2002, 13(1)[DOI]
- 김지은, "조사 ‘이", 가’와 ‘은, 언어과학연구, pp.2009, (48)[DOI]
- 남기심, "주어와 주제어", 어문학, 26, pp.128~131 (1972), 한국어문학회
- 남윤진, "우리말 연구 : 서른아홉마당", pp.157~192 (2005), 태학사
- 박승윤, "담화의 기능으로 본 국어의 주제", 언어, 11(1), pp.1~15 (1986), 한국언어학회
- 성기철, "국어의 주제 문제", 한글, (188), pp.65~90 (1985), 한글학회
- 원미진, "조사 ‘이", 가’와 ‘은, 국제어문, pp.2016, (68)[DOI]
- 이정민, "(비)한정성", (불)특정성 대 화제(Topic), 국어학, pp.1992, 22[DOI]
- 이정희, "한국어 학습자의 표현 오류 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2002
- 이창덕, "한국어 교육에서 주어와 주제 구분에 대하여", 문법 교육, 21, pp.239~263 (2014), 한국문법교육학회
- 정보영, "구어 이야기 담화에서 한국어 중급 학습자의 조사 '은", 는', '이, 석사, pp.이화여자대학교 교육대학원, 한국어교육[DOI]
- 채완, "助詞 ‘는’의 意味", 국어학, (4), pp.93~113 (1975), 국어학회
- 최석재, "조사 ‘은", 는’과 ‘이, 우리말연구, pp.2013, (35)[DOI]
- 한송화, "한국어 학습자의 보조사 ‘은", 는’의 사용 양상과 오류 연구 - 언어권과 숙달도에 따른 차이를 중심으로 -, 2016, pp.(70), 111~151[DOI]
- 한송화, "구어 담화에서 보조사 ‘은", 는’의 의미와 담화 기능 -한국어교육 문법을 위하여-, 2017, pp.55, 81~111[DOI]
- 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 도서출판 역락
- 홍세희, "이항 및 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석" (2005), 교육과학사
- 홍정하, "담화 표지 ‘-는’", ‘-가’와 화자 시점 - 코퍼스 언어학적 접근 -, 2011, pp.34, 451~477[DOI]
- Chafe, W. L., "Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View, Subject and Topic", pp.26~55 (1975), Academic Press
- Kuno, S., "Functional sentence perspective : a case study form Japanese and English", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.269~320 (1972)
- Li, C.N., "Subject and Topic : A New Typology of Language", pp.457~490 (1975), Academic Press