중국인 학습자의 한국어 조사 ‘이/가’와 ‘은/는’의 습득 연구
Chinese L2 Acquisition of Korean Particle i/ka and eun/nun
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study has investigated Chinese learners’ acquisition of Korean particle i/ka and eun/nun which had different meanings depending on linguistic contexts. Meanings of i/ka include exclusiveness, information focus, specificity, selectional listing. eun/nun has meanings of topic and contrast; topic was sub-categorized into aboutness, genericity, givenness, and contrast into two types depending on the explicitness of counterparts. Participants of the study were 25 native speakers of Korean(NKs) and 40 Chinese learners of Korean(CKs), and CKs were divided into two groups of high CKs and low CKs according to their proficiency. They were asked to select a Korean particle appropriate to a given sentence among 4 choices. ANOVA on the scores of i/ka and eun/nun has been conducted to examine whether there existed significant differences among three groups in different linguistic contexts. The result showed that there were significant differences among scores of three groups. The results of additional analyses are as follows: (1) In four meanings of i/ka, which were included in the study, there were no significant differences between scores of NKs and high CKs. Scores of low CKs were significantly different from those of NKs and high CKs. (2) In three meanings of eun/nun, genericity, givenness and contrast, scores of low CKs and high CKs were significantly different from those of NKs, but there were no significant difference between two subgroups of CKs. However, in eun/nun which has meaning of 'aboutness', there was no significant difference between scores of NKs and high CKs, while scores of low CKs were significantly different from the others.
Abstract
The study has investigated Chinese learners’ acquisition of Korean particle i/ka and eun/nun which had different meanings depending on linguistic contexts. Meanings of i/ka include exclusiveness, information focus, specificity, selectional listing. eun/nun has meanings of topic and contrast; topic was sub-categorized into aboutness, genericity, givenness, and contrast into two types depending on the explicitness of counterparts. Participants of the study were 25 native speakers of Korean(NKs) and 40 Chinese learners of Korean(CKs), and CKs were divided into two groups of high CKs and low CKs according to their proficiency. They were asked to select a Korean particle appropriate to a given sentence among 4 choices. ANOVA on the scores of i/ka and eun/nun has been conducted to examine whether there existed significant differences among three groups in different linguistic contexts. The result showed that there were significant differences among scores of three groups. The results of additional analyses are as follows: (1) In four meanings of i/ka, which were included in the study, there were no significant differences between scores of NKs and high CKs. Scores of low CKs were significantly different from those of NKs and high CKs. (2) In three meanings of eun/nun, genericity, givenness and contrast, scores of low CKs and high CKs were significantly different from those of NKs, but there were no significant difference between two subgroups of CKs. However, in eun/nun which has meaning of 'aboutness', there was no significant difference between scores of NKs and high CKs, while scores of low CKs were significantly different from the others.
참고문헌 (25)
- 고석주, "한국어 조사의 연구 : '-가'와 '-를'을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2001
- 김선희, "조사 ‘가’의 의미와 주제", 연세 어문, 16, pp.28~41 (1983)
- 김기화, "국어의 격 연구" (1994), 한국문화사
- 金源卿, "외국어로서의 한국어 교육을 위한 조사 “은", 는”과 “이, 석사, pp.梨花女子大學校 大學院, 한국학[DOI]
- 김정숙, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 조사 사용 오류 분석과 교육 방법 -‘-이", 가’와 ‘-은, 한국어교육, pp.2002, 13(1)[DOI]
- 김정은, "일본어권 학습자의 조사 오용 양상", 한국어교육, 15(1), pp.1~31 (2004), 국제한국어교육학회
- 김지은, "조사 ‘이", 가’와 ‘은, 언어과학연구, pp.2009, (48)[DOI]
- 김한곤, "A Semantic Analysis of the Topic Particles in Korean and Japanese", 어학연구, 3(2), pp.106~117 (1967)
- 남기심, "주제어와 주어", 국문학, 26, pp.128~131 (1972)
- 성기철, "국어의 주제 문제", 한글, 188, pp.65~90 (1985)
- 신창순, "국어의 주제 문제 연구", 문법연구, 2, pp.131~170 (1975)
- 유동석, "양태조사의 통보기능에 대한 연구 : {이},{을},{은}을 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.1984
- 이종성, "사회과학 연구를 위한 통계 방법" (2000), 박영사
- 이필영, "조사 ‘가", 이’의 의미분석, 1982, pp.7, 417~431
- 임홍빈, "국어 문법의 심층" (1998), 태학사
- 정해권, "한국어 문장의 주제와 초점 구조 습득 -‘은", 는’과 ‘이, 한국어교육, pp.2011, 22(3)[DOI]
- 채완, "조사 ‘는’의 의미", 국어학, 4, pp.93~113 (1976)
- 홍사만, "한·일어 의존형태소의 대조 연구 – 특수조사 ‘는", 은’과 부조사 ‘wa (は)와의 비교를 중심으로, 1980, pp.14, 91~121
- 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
- 김중섭, "경희 한국어 문법 1" (2014), 도서출판 하우
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어 1" (2008), 교보문고
- 서강대학교한국어교육원, "서강 한국어 1A" (2008), 서강대학교국제문화교육원출판부
- 서울대학교 언어교육원, "서울대 한국어 1A" (2013), 문진미디어
- 연세대학교 한국어학당, "연세 한국어 1-1" (2013), 연세대학교 출판부
- 이화여자대학교 언어교육원, "이화 한국어 1-1" (2010), 이화여자대학교 출판부
