배우자 거주권 제도의 도입 필요성과 도입방안―일본에서의 개정작업에 대한 검토를 중심으로―
A Study on the Right of Spousal Residence and the Its Legislation
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current inheritance law has a clear limitation in terms of guaranteeing surviving spouses the housing and cash for the rest of their life. According to the joint inheritance system(co-ownership of inherited property) and the legal status of spouses in the share of inheritance, there is high risk for surviving spouses of being deprived of the residence, due to the conflict with the other heirs, their disposition of co-owned share to the third party or the shortage of cash for restitution of unjust enrichment. Therefore the short-term right of spousal residence should be newly enacted, so that surviving spouses can keep living in the dwelling in which they have abode without compensation until the inheritance property division is completed. Furthermore, the relevant provisions on Chonsegwon(which means right to registered lease on deposit basis) should be supplemented so that it can function as the long-term right of spousal residence, in the case of inherited property division by agreement or by trial, as well as in the event of will. The needs of spouse, who desires the power of use, not the ownership, hereby can be met, and the will of deceased, who hoped to transfer his property to the descendants and wished to secure the residence for his spouse at the same time, can be fulfilled.
Abstract
The current inheritance law has a clear limitation in terms of guaranteeing surviving spouses the housing and cash for the rest of their life. According to the joint inheritance system(co-ownership of inherited property) and the legal status of spouses in the share of inheritance, there is high risk for surviving spouses of being deprived of the residence, due to the conflict with the other heirs, their disposition of co-owned share to the third party or the shortage of cash for restitution of unjust enrichment. Therefore the short-term right of spousal residence should be newly enacted, so that surviving spouses can keep living in the dwelling in which they have abode without compensation until the inheritance property division is completed. Furthermore, the relevant provisions on Chonsegwon(which means right to registered lease on deposit basis) should be supplemented so that it can function as the long-term right of spousal residence, in the case of inherited property division by agreement or by trial, as well as in the event of will. The needs of spouse, who desires the power of use, not the ownership, hereby can be met, and the will of deceased, who hoped to transfer his property to the descendants and wished to secure the residence for his spouse at the same time, can be fulfilled.
참고문헌 (38)
- 郭潤直, "相續法" (2004), 博英社
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2017), 法文社
- 송덕수, "친족상속법" (2018), 박영사
- 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" (2018), 박영사
- 윤진수, "주해친족법 제2권" (2015), 박영사
- 이경희, "가족법" (2017), 法元社
- 곽민희, "프랑스에 있어서 生存配偶者의 相續法上의 地位", 민사법학, 59, pp.325~367 (2012), 한국민사법학회[DOI]
- 곽민희, "일본의 배우자 상속법제 개정 작업 관견", 법학연구, 26(1), pp.1~38 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 곽민희, "2018년 일본 개정 상속법 개관", 안암법학, (57), pp.61~126 (2018), 안암법학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "프랑스민법상 배우자의 주거보호", 비교사법, 18(1), pp.117~144 (2011), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "프랑스민법상 공동재산제", 가족법연구, 25(2), pp.63~108 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 김상용, "사망으로 혼인이 해소된 경우 생존 배우자의 재산권 보호", 중앙법학, 17(2), pp.223~266 (2015), 중앙법학회[DOI]
- 西 希代子, "일본의 상속법 개정을 위한 최근의 동향", 가족법연구, 31(2), pp.444~467 (2017), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- 박인환, "일본의 상속법 개정동향- 배우자거주권 및 상속재산분할등을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 21(3), pp.131~173 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 박정기, "일본의 상속법 개정", 법학논고, (63), pp.229~262 (2018), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 박종용, "배우자상속권의 강화에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.8~260 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 윤진수, "民法改正案 중 夫婦財産制에 관한 연구", 民法論攷, 4 (2009), 博英社
- 윤진수, "배우자의 상속법상 지위 개선 방안에 관한 연구", 서울대학교 법학연구소 공동연구 학술대회: 상속법의 개정 자료집 (2019)
- 이승현, "일본 개정민법상 배우자의거주권 보호 규정에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 38(4), pp.339~390 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정구태, "2014년 법무부 민법개정위원회의 상속법 개정시안에 대한 비판적 斷想", 강원법학, 41, pp.987~1014 (2014), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
- Habu Kaori, "2018年日本民法(相続法)改正の必要と今後の課題", 서강법률논총, 8(1), pp.37~53 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 홍순기, "배우자상속권 강화에 관한 법무부 개정시안 검토", 법학논총, 27(2), pp.245~274 (2014), 법학연구소[DOI]
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第1回 会議(平成27年 4月 21日) 參考資料 1", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第1回 会議(平成27年 4月 21日) 參考資料 2", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第2回 会議(平成27年 5月 19日) 部會資料 2", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第2回 会議(平成 27年 5月 19日) 議事録", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第6回 会議(平成27年 10月 20日) 部會資料 6", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第11回 会議(平成28年 4月 12日) 部會資料 11", ~ (2016)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第12回 会議(平成28年 5月 17日) 部會資料 12", ~ (2016)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第13回 会議(平成28年 6月 21日) 部會資料 13", ~ (2016)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第14回 会議(平成27年 10月 18日) 部會資料 14", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第15回 会議(平成27年 11月 22日) 部會資料 15", ~ (2015)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第21回 会議(平成29年 5月 23日) 部會資料 21", ~ (2017)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第22回 会議(平成29年 6月 20日) 部會資料 22-2", ~ (2017)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第23回 会議(平成29年 7月 18日) 部會資料 23-2", ~ (2017)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第24回 会議(平成29年 10月 17日) 部會資料 24-2", ~ (2017)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第25回 会議(平成29年 12月 19日) 部會資料 25-2", ~ (2017)
- "日本 法務省 法制審議会 民法 (相続関係) 部会 第26回 会議(平成30年 1月 16日) 部會資料 26-2", ~ (2018)