3․1운동의 역사적 기억과 배반, 그리고 계승을 둘러싼 이념정치 -3․1운동의 보편(주의)적 지평과 과소/과잉의 대표성-

Abstract

This essay focuses on true succession and representation of the 3.1 Movement, it was reenacting the tendency of de-nationalization had been caused the Second World War what Carl Schmitt called. It must be that 3.1 Movement is worthy of special mention among histories of the Korean Peninsula, but regarded it as the object of ideological dispute of socio-political was a certain product of the state of affairs around the Korean Peninsula. The Second World War has been fully foregrounding de-nationalization of the universal ideological politics for new world order, freeing ourself from Eurocentric order of international law and norm. As two contrary opinions about the Emperor system of Japan show, form of modern sovereign state-making in East Asia was not free from the universal horizon of de-nationalization articulated class, region, nation and race since the end of the war. Within this complicated situation of East Asia the Korean Peninsula also has been undergone socio-political ideological dispute equivalent to a civil war. The Left of the Korean Peninsula tried to make agenda about true succession and representation of 3.1 Movement as the democratic revolution embodying the universal horizon. But Being the real agents for the right of South Korea in establishing the ROK regime was covered true succession and representation of 3.1 Movement arguing the left of South Korea. The left of South Korea tried to stand against the right of South Korea by changing over- representation with excessive feeling of expectancy about the Provisional Government into under-representation. But this problem which the left of South Korea brought out was covered with physical repression against them, the ROK made it a fetish by inflecting and mediating another universal horizon of approval by the UN. While 3.1 Movement and the Legal Genealogy of the Provisional Government was internalized into the ROK, Lee Kwang-Soo announced 「my confession(나의 고백)」 of his Autobiographic life story. It showed that presentation of the ROK where it oriented. Lee Kwang-Soo defined the boundary for political system of the ROK as anti-communism=democracy. Through this process the ROK could do to be moral of politics and to be politics of moral following the outbreak of the Korean War. In this a series of changing socio- historical movement, agency of the historical memory and meaning- making of 3.1 Movement was to be reveal.