본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

업무상 위력에 의한 성폭력범죄와 성인지 감수성

Sex Crime within Authority Relations and Gender Sensitivity

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

On October 5, 2017, the alleged sexual assault of Harvey Weinstein, a famous Hollywood film producer, was revealed. The MeToo campaign, which began with this, quickly spread through SNS. In December 2017, the U.S. weekly magazine TIME selected “The Silence Breaker,” which accused sexual violence through #MeToo, as “Person of the Year.” This proved that the voices of the victims, who summoned the courage to improve the gender discriminating organizational culture, have attracted worldwide attention. In the Republic of Korea, an incumbent prosecutor revealed publicly in January 2018 that she had been sexually harassed in a televised interview, triggering the MeToo movement. Since then, there have been revelations by victims of sexual violence in various sectors of society, including culture and art world. In the process, an actor identified as the perpetrator committed suicide, and many of the victims who participated in the MeToo movement suffered again due to counter-accusation and doxing. In particular, in March 2018, the secretary of the leading politician who was attracting attention as the next presidential candidate appeared on live news and announced her sexual violence damage, and the situation reached its peak. Even the authoritarian remarks made by the accused to the victim were known through the pouring articles. And, over time, the incident has moved away from people’s attention. In September 2019, the politician ended up a criminal with the ruling of the Supreme Court. Now that the vortex of MeToo has passed once, this paper will examine the case, in which first trial that was acquitted on the same issue, and the appeal and Supreme Court that had been convicted are clearly in contrast.

Abstract

On October 5, 2017, the alleged sexual assault of Harvey Weinstein, a famous Hollywood film producer, was revealed. The MeToo campaign, which began with this, quickly spread through SNS. In December 2017, the U.S. weekly magazine TIME selected “The Silence Breaker,” which accused sexual violence through #MeToo, as “Person of the Year.” This proved that the voices of the victims, who summoned the courage to improve the gender discriminating organizational culture, have attracted worldwide attention. In the Republic of Korea, an incumbent prosecutor revealed publicly in January 2018 that she had been sexually harassed in a televised interview, triggering the MeToo movement. Since then, there have been revelations by victims of sexual violence in various sectors of society, including culture and art world. In the process, an actor identified as the perpetrator committed suicide, and many of the victims who participated in the MeToo movement suffered again due to counter-accusation and doxing. In particular, in March 2018, the secretary of the leading politician who was attracting attention as the next presidential candidate appeared on live news and announced her sexual violence damage, and the situation reached its peak. Even the authoritarian remarks made by the accused to the victim were known through the pouring articles. And, over time, the incident has moved away from people’s attention. In September 2019, the politician ended up a criminal with the ruling of the Supreme Court. Now that the vortex of MeToo has passed once, this paper will examine the case, in which first trial that was acquitted on the same issue, and the appeal and Supreme Court that had been convicted are clearly in contrast.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김인회, "형사소송법" (2018), 피앤씨미디어
  2. 2009, , ~
  3. 신동운, "간추린 신형사소송법" (2019), 법문사
  4. 이재상, "형사소송법" (2019), 박영사
  5. 이주원, "형사소송법" (2020), 박영사
  6. 임동규, "형사소송법" (2018), 법문사
  7. 권희경, "성인지 감수성 높은 교육을 위한 교사의 성인지 역량 강화 방안", 한국가정과교육학회 학술대회자료집 (2018), 한국가정과교육학회
  8. 김성돈, "형법상 위력개념의 해석과 업무상 위력간음죄의 위력", 형사정책연구, 30(1), pp.123~156 (2019), 한국형사법무정책연구원
  9. 김태명, "권력형 성범죄의 처벌과 비동의간음·추행죄의 도입", 법학연구, 57, pp.137~163 (2018), 부설법학연구소
  10. 김한균, "업무상 위력 간음죄와 권력형 성폭력", 서울법학, 26(3), pp.259~291 (2018), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
  11. 류화진, "업무상 위력에 의한 간음죄에 관한 다른 해석의 시도", 원광법학, 34(2), pp.191~208 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
  12. 박귀천, "성희롱 관련 소송의 심리기준 ― ‘성인지 감수성’ ― 대법원 2018. 4. 12. 선고 2017두74702 판결 ―", 월간 노동리뷰 (2018), 한국노동연구원
  13. 박찬걸, "업무상 위력에 의한 성범죄의 적용상 한계 및 개선방안에 대한 비판적 검토", 형사정책연구, 29(4), pp.87~116 (2018), 한국형사법무정책연구원
  14. 변혜정, "성희롱의 법적 판단기준과 피해의미의 딜레마: 법", 경험의 틈새를 성찰하는‘피해자’관점을 중심으로, 2008, pp.24(3), 111~145[DOI]
  15. 안경옥, "'위력’에 의한 간음·추행죄의 판단기준 및 형법상 성범죄규정의 개선방안", 경희법학, 50(4), pp.205~231 (2015), 법학연구소
  16. 윤경희, "경찰공무원의 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 성인지 감수성과 성평등 정책 인식 및 만족도의 실태와 차이 분석", 경찰학논총, 14(4), pp.9~37 (2019), 경찰학연구소[DOI]
  17. 윤덕경, "성폭력 판례에 대한 성인지적 분석과 개선과제", 이화젠더법학, 7(1), pp.73~107 (2015), 젠더법학연구소[DOI]
  18. 안희정 전 충남도지사 성폭력사건 2심 판결 쟁점분석 변호인단 간담회 자료, "안희정 성폭력사건 공동대책위원회", ~ (2019)
  19. 이호중, "업무상 위력에 의한 성폭력 판단기준에 대하여 ― 안희정 1심 판결에 대한 비판 ―, In 위력에 의한 성폭력, 판단기준은 무엇인가 ― 안희정 성폭력사건 1심 판결을 중심으로 ―", 토론회 자료집, #미투운동과 함께하는시민행동, 민주사회를위한변호사모임 여성인권위원회, 안희정 성폭력사건공동대책위원회 주최 (2019)
  20. 차인순, "법의 중립성과 성인지적 관점: 평등원칙을 중심으로", 한국여성학, 17(1) (2001), 한국여성학회
  21. 차혜령, "안희정 성폭력사건 1심 판결 평석 (1) 위력 판단 등 판결의 전반적인 문제점, In 위력에 의한 성폭력, 판단기준은 무엇인가 ― 안희정 성폭력사건 1심 판결을 중심으로 ―", 토론회 자료집, #미투운동과함께하는 시민행동, 민주사회를위한변호사모임 여성인권위원회, 안희정 성폭력사건 공동대책위원회 주최 (2019)
  22. 한국여성정책연구원, "미투운동 이후 사회변화에 대한 의견 조사결과 발표", KWDI Brief, (51) (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)