항거불능의 상태에 있지 않은 사람에 대한 준강간의 시도 ― 불능미수? 장애미수? ― 1)
Quasi-rape attempts to people who are not in a state of non-resistance ― Impossible Crime? Criminal Attempts? ―
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The facts of this ruling can be said to be simple. The actor thinks that the victim who is not incapable of being intoxicated is considered to be incapable of being intoxicated and takes advantage of the opportunity to embark on the practice of quasi-rape and have sex. However, the majority of opinions on the target judgments indicate that the accused person is drunk against a victim who is not incapable of anti-disobedience. Admit it. However, it was a mistake to judge a matter to be judged as a disability as an unacceptable attempt to admit the inability to immediately because the result did not occur simply because of the impossibility of means or objects. Therefore, as a criterion for distinguishing between disability attempts and disability attempts, ‘impossibility of occurrence of a result due to error of means or objects’ should be used as a specific criterion, whether it is a result of an accident or a result in any case. Therefore, this issue should be judged as a failure of the disability, not an incompetence of the quasi-rapist. *
Abstract
The facts of this ruling can be said to be simple. The actor thinks that the victim who is not incapable of being intoxicated is considered to be incapable of being intoxicated and takes advantage of the opportunity to embark on the practice of quasi-rape and have sex. However, the majority of opinions on the target judgments indicate that the accused person is drunk against a victim who is not incapable of anti-disobedience. Admit it. However, it was a mistake to judge a matter to be judged as a disability as an unacceptable attempt to admit the inability to immediately because the result did not occur simply because of the impossibility of means or objects. Therefore, as a criterion for distinguishing between disability attempts and disability attempts, ‘impossibility of occurrence of a result due to error of means or objects’ should be used as a specific criterion, whether it is a result of an accident or a result in any case. Therefore, this issue should be judged as a failure of the disability, not an incompetence of the quasi-rapist. *
참고문헌 (16)
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2018), SKKUP
- 김종원, "형사법강좌Ⅱ" (1984), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2004), 박영사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2001), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2014), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법총론" (2018), 박영사
- 김재현, "가능미수와 불능미수의 구별기준 - 수단 또는 대상의 착오로 인한 결과발생의 불가능 -", 비교형사법연구, 17(1), pp.177~211 (2015), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
- 김호기, "살인죄에 있어서 불능미수와 장애미수의 구별", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.569~586 (2007), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 이정원, "불능범의 새로운 이해", 형사정책연구, 13(4), pp.3~92 (2002), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 임상규, "형법 제27조의 위험성과 그 실무적 함의", 성균관법학, 20(3), pp.733~753 (2008), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 정영일, "불능미수의 불법구조에 관한 재검토", 형사정책연구, 20(3), pp.61~85 (2009), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 천진호, "불능미수범의 '결과발생 불가능’과 관련한 해석상의 문제점", 동아법학, (42), pp.91~116 (2008), 법학연구소
- 천진호, "불능미수의 위험성 판단 ― 해석상의 오류를 중심으로", 비교형사법연구, 1(1) (1999)
- 류부곤, "불능미수범에 있어서 위험성 요건의 의미", 형사법연구, 21(2), pp.57~78 (2009), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 홍영기, "불능미수의 가능성 표지 - 장애미수와 불능미수의 구별 요건 -", 형사법연구, 20(1), pp.55~74 (2008), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 홍영기, "준강간의 미수 : 장애미수와 불능미수의 구별- 대법원 2019. 3. 28. 선고 2018도16002 전원합의체 판결 -", 법조, 68(3), pp.659~677 (2019), 법조협회[DOI]