표현의 자유를 제약하는 게임물관리위원회의 심의실무 사례연구
Case Study on Rating Practice of GRAC that Restrict Freedom of Expression
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to check the Game Rating and Administration Committee(GRAC), established in 2013 as revision of law to the Game Industry Promotion Act, restricts the freedom of expression. Game Rating system in Korea is not formed spontaneously in the market, unlike oversea, the Government has designed public systems. The GRAC has classified only “Rating”, but it regulates the expressions of the Game and gaming industry itself by other than raising rating. In cases the GRAC issued decisions of rating rejection are suspected to be in mistake in the interpretation of relevant laws, resulting in expressions of the game is limited. The content modification notifying system has unclear criteria, and it regulates not the contents of the game but the ways of using games. It is contrary to the principle of the content centrality of rating, and Operators have to impose self-censorship when they change game contents.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to check the Game Rating and Administration Committee(GRAC), established in 2013 as revision of law to the Game Industry Promotion Act, restricts the freedom of expression. Game Rating system in Korea is not formed spontaneously in the market, unlike oversea, the Government has designed public systems. The GRAC has classified only “Rating”, but it regulates the expressions of the Game and gaming industry itself by other than raising rating. In cases the GRAC issued decisions of rating rejection are suspected to be in mistake in the interpretation of relevant laws, resulting in expressions of the game is limited. The content modification notifying system has unclear criteria, and it regulates not the contents of the game but the ways of using games. It is contrary to the principle of the content centrality of rating, and Operators have to impose self-censorship when they change game contents.
참고문헌 (9)
- 강신규, "디지털 게임의 자율규제 방안에 관한 비교분석적 접근", 한국게임학회 논문지, 12(6), pp.107~119 (2012), 한국게임학회[DOI]
- Trends and Implications of the World Game Rating System, "Min-Kyu Kim", ~, pp.Kocca Focus 09-11 (2009)
- 김윤명, "게임물의 창작활성화를 위한 게임법상 내용규제 검토 - 게임법상 내용수정신고제도 및 이에 대한 게임법 개정안의 검토를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 52(2), pp.531~559 (2011), 법학연구소
- 김윤명, "게임물의 사행화 규제 및 그 타당성 검토", 정보법학, 16(3), pp.233~269 (2012), 한국정보법학회
- Yun-Myung Kim, "Game Service and Law" (2014), Kyungin Publishing
- 김지연, "게임 거버넌스에 관한 논고: 푸코의 통치성 개념으로 바라본 게임등급시스템", 한국게임학회 논문지, 13(2), pp.143~154 (2013), 한국게임학회[DOI]
- 박태순, "세계 게임심의제도의 추세 및 함의점", 한국게임학회 논문지, 11(4), pp.93~104 (2011), 한국게임학회
- Seung-Heum Hwang, "Rating System of Movie and Game" (2014), communicationbooks
- Young Hur, "The Constitutional Theory and Constitutional Law" (2006), Pakyoungsa