게임법상 등급분류거부제도의 위헌성에 대한 연구
The Constitutional violation of rating regulation in game law
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The article 18 of game review regulation has some problems related to mandate of upper law; it violates the limit of mandate of upper law and judicial power. The article 2 of Game industry promotion law defines the concept of ‘gambling behavior’. But the article 18 of game review regulation includes behaviors which are not included in the article 2 to regulate them. Court should have the power to interpret which is ‘gambling behavior’ or not;according to the article 18 of game review regulation, the game rating board has the power to interpret which is ‘gambling behavior’ or not. According to the revision of Game industry promotion law, rating rejection to the violation of Game industry promotion law is possible. Minor violation of law as to business regulation should not be considered as the reason of rating rejection. Therefore, The revision of game law has probability of violating Constitution principle such as proportion rule.
Abstract
The article 18 of game review regulation has some problems related to mandate of upper law; it violates the limit of mandate of upper law and judicial power. The article 2 of Game industry promotion law defines the concept of ‘gambling behavior’. But the article 18 of game review regulation includes behaviors which are not included in the article 2 to regulate them. Court should have the power to interpret which is ‘gambling behavior’ or not;according to the article 18 of game review regulation, the game rating board has the power to interpret which is ‘gambling behavior’ or not. According to the revision of Game industry promotion law, rating rejection to the violation of Game industry promotion law is possible. Minor violation of law as to business regulation should not be considered as the reason of rating rejection. Therefore, The revision of game law has probability of violating Constitution principle such as proportion rule.
참고문헌 (9)
- 이정훈, "온라인 웹보드게임 규제정책과 형사처벌의 한계", 중앙법학, 15(2), pp.169~196 (2013), 중앙법학회
- 황성기, "온라인 웹보드게임의 사행성 규제의 헌법적 한계 - 도박과 게임의 개념본질적 구분을 중심으로 -", 경제규제와 법, 4(2), pp.41~59 (2011), 법학연구소
- Seung-Heum Hwang, "Applicability of Censorship to Rating Rejection of Gambling Game, In Current Status and Challenges of Game Law" (2009), PAKYOUNGSA
- 황승흠, "2007년 개정 게임산업진흥법상 사행성게임물제도의 의의와 법적 성격", 공법학연구, 8(4), pp.305~328 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
- Seung-Heum Hwang, "Prospect and history of the Korea Game law system, In Current Status and Challenges of Game Law" (2009), PAKYOUNGSA
- 황성기, "온라인게임 심의 및 등급분류제도의 법적 문제점 : 현행 게임산업진흥법과 게임산업진흥법개정안의 특징 및 문제점을 중심으로", 언론과 법, 7(2), pp.179~212 (2008), (사)한국언론법학회
- 이정훈, "射倖性 게임물에 대한 刑事責任", 중앙법학, 8(4), pp.35~68 (2006), 중앙법학회
- 문기탁, "스마트폰용 게임콘텐츠 개발 활성화를 위한 규제 개선방안 -게임 산업 관련 제도의 문제점을 중심으로-", 법학연구, 51(4), pp.193~218 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김용찬, "도박⋅도박개장죄, 사행행위 등 규제 및 처벌특례법위반죄 및 게임산업진흥에 관한 법률위반죄의 관계에 대한 고찰", 저스티스, (113), pp.133~177 (2009), 한국법학원