고등학생의 의사결정 유형에 따른 생명과학 관련 사회적•윤리적 문제에 대한 의사결정 양상 분석
An analysis of patterns in high school student's decision-making about socioscientific issues across different types of decision-making on life science
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to understand how high school students with different decision-making types show different patterns of decision-making about three socioscientific issues on life science. A series of eight lessons were performed for three months with ten high school students in Geonggi Province. Students were classified into four types of decision-making, and their opinions about three topics concerning SSI were analyzed and compared with each other. The results were as follows. First, intuitive groups showed more ethical conflict than rational groups in a discussion of animal rights and animal welfare in animal experiments. Second, all groups of students made a decision according to the premise on the topic to be considered, deontology and consequentialism, but rational groups and intuitive groups differed in the grounds for decision. Third, there was no significant distinction in students' opinion among different types of decision-making in a discussion after watching a documentary related to genetically modified crops. The implications of these results for three topics were discussed.
Abstract
This study aims to understand how high school students with different decision-making types show different patterns of decision-making about three socioscientific issues on life science. A series of eight lessons were performed for three months with ten high school students in Geonggi Province. Students were classified into four types of decision-making, and their opinions about three topics concerning SSI were analyzed and compared with each other. The results were as follows. First, intuitive groups showed more ethical conflict than rational groups in a discussion of animal rights and animal welfare in animal experiments. Second, all groups of students made a decision according to the premise on the topic to be considered, deontology and consequentialism, but rational groups and intuitive groups differed in the grounds for decision. Third, there was no significant distinction in students' opinion among different types of decision-making in a discussion after watching a documentary related to genetically modified crops. The implications of these results for three topics were discussed.
참고문헌 (31)
- Albe, V., "When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect : Students' argumentation in group discussions on a socioscientific issue", Research in Science Education, 38, pp.67~90 (2008)
- Beu, D. S., "Ethical decision-making : A multidimensional construct", Business Ethics : A European Review, 12(1), pp.88~107 (2003)
- Choi, K., "Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), pp.670~697 (2011)
- Dawson, V. M., "Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics", Research in Science Education, 40, pp.133~148 (2010)
- Dori, Y. J., "Teaching biotechnology through case studies: Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?", Science Education, 87(6), pp.767~793 (2003)
- Fleming, R., "Adolescent reasoning in socioscientific issues, part I : Social cognition", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), pp.677~687 (1986)
- Fowler, S. R., "Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students", International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), pp.279~296 (2009)
- Han, K. J., "The effect of learning in social studies upon methods of display in AV(audio & visual)programs", Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 30, pp.339~353 (2000)
- 주인애, "생명공학과 관련된 사회적 쟁점에 대한 중학생들의 가치판단 및 의사결정 과정에서 드러난 가치 적용 방식 유형", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.79~93 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- 이현주, "과학과 관련된 사회적·윤리적 문제에 대한 예비 과학교사들의 의사결정유형", 교과교육학연구, 12(2), pp.377~396 (2008), 교과교육연구소
- Lee, H., "Korean science teachers' perceptions of the introduction of socioscientific issues into the science curriculum", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(2), pp.97~117 (2006)
- Lee, H., "Developing character and values for global citizens : Analysis of pre-service science teachers' moral reasoning on socioscientific issues", International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), pp.925~953 (2012)
- 이현주, "과학관련 사회쟁점 수업에서 과학교사의 교수활동에 대한 분석: 문화역사적 활동이론의 관점에서", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 13(5), pp.413~433 (2013), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 이현자, "고등학생의 의사결정 유형 조사", 생물교육, 35(2), pp.328~336 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
- Lee, M. K., "The effect of science-technology-society teaching on students' attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity", International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), pp.1315~1327 (2007)
- 임미연, "생명공학 SSI 수업에서 나타난 영재 중학생들의 의사결정 변화의 유형 분석", 교과교육학연구, 17(4), pp.1501~1522 (2013), 교과교육연구소
- 2009 Revised science curriculum, "MEST", Ministry of Education and Science Technology, ~, pp.2011-361(supp. 9) (2011)
- "“GMO Information""[URL]
- Millar, R., "Twenty first century science : Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science", International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), pp.1499~1521 (2006)
- 박인옥, "생명윤리와 생명윤리교육에 대한 중·고등학교 교사의 인식 조사", 생물교육, 33(4), pp.491~504 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 박상섭, "여고생의 자동제세동기에 대한 강사중심학습과 영상자가학습과의 교육효과 비교", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 12(4), pp.1732~1739 (2011), 한국산학기술학회
- Patronis, T., "Students'argumentation in decision-making on a socioscientific issue : Implications for teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), pp.745~754 (1999)
- Ryoo, K., "Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students' understanding of energy in photosynthesis?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), pp.218~243 (2012)
- Sadler, T. D., "Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue", International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), pp.387~409 (2004)
- Tal, T., "Teaching socioscientific issues : Classroom culture and students' performances", Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), pp.615~644 (2006)
- Tal, T., "Reasoning, problem-solving and reflections : Participating in WISE project in Israel", Science Education International, 14, pp.3~19 (2003)
- von Aufschnaiter, C., "Arguing to learn and learning to argue : Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), pp.101~131 (2008)
- 양정은, "과학과 관련된 사회·윤리적 문제(SSI)의 도입을 통한 창의·인성 교육 가능성에 대한 과학교사들의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(1), pp.113~128 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
- Zeidler, D. l., "Tangled up in views : Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas", Science Education, 86, pp.343~367 (2002)
- Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education", Science Education, 89, pp.357~377 (2005)
- Zohar, A., "Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), pp.35~62 (2002)