본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

การวิเคราะห์เปรียบเทียบคำว่า “ให้”ในภาษาไทยและ 주다 ในภาษาเกาหลี

Comparative Analysis on Thai /haj/ and Korean ‘주다’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류지역학

초록

Thai /haj/ is a multi‐function word that has diverse functions according to syntactic distribution. Accordingly, the usage of /haj/ is difficult for foreign learners to learn. When Thai /haj/ functions as double object verb or auxiliary verb, it corresponds to Korean ‘주다.’ In this research, a comparative analysis was conducted on how Thai /haj/ corresponds to Korean ‘주다.’ The results of the analysis are as follows. When Thai /haj/ functions as the double object verb, the order of the words appears as subject + double object verb + direct object + indirect object, and the preposition can come before the indirect object. When Korean ‘주다’ is used as the double object verb, the order of the words appears as subject + indirect object + direct object + double object verb, and the inversion of sentence elements is relatively unrestricted. In the case of the Korean language, the case particle suitable to sentence elements should be used. When Thai /haj/ functions as the auxiliary verb, it appears in the position similar to that of some prepositions, so it sometimes is analyzed as the preposition, but this research examined the syntactic characteristics of /haj/ sentence structure and clarified that it functions as the auxiliary verb representing the meaning of benefit or service. Korean ‘주다’ that corresponds to this has the form of being connected to the main verb by ‘아/어.’ In the Thai language, the noun phrase that comes after /haj/ becomes the beneficiary, and in the Korean language, the direct object or the indirect object becomes the beneficiary. When the noun clause other than the noun phrase appears after the auxiliary verb /haj/ while having the sentence structure similar to Thai /haj/ auxiliary verb sentence structure, /haj/ functions as the conjunction leading the adverbial clause and it corresponds to Korean adverbial element ‘게.’Through this research, considerable similarities and differences in the sentence structure of Thai /haj/ and Korean ‘주다,’ were able to be clarified. The results of this research are expected to be of considerable help to both Korean learners studying the Thai language and Thai learners studying the Korean language.

Abstract

Thai /haj/ is a multi‐function word that has diverse functions according to syntactic distribution. Accordingly, the usage of /haj/ is difficult for foreign learners to learn. When Thai /haj/ functions as double object verb or auxiliary verb, it corresponds to Korean ‘주다.’ In this research, a comparative analysis was conducted on how Thai /haj/ corresponds to Korean ‘주다.’ The results of the analysis are as follows. When Thai /haj/ functions as the double object verb, the order of the words appears as subject + double object verb + direct object + indirect object, and the preposition can come before the indirect object. When Korean ‘주다’ is used as the double object verb, the order of the words appears as subject + indirect object + direct object + double object verb, and the inversion of sentence elements is relatively unrestricted. In the case of the Korean language, the case particle suitable to sentence elements should be used. When Thai /haj/ functions as the auxiliary verb, it appears in the position similar to that of some prepositions, so it sometimes is analyzed as the preposition, but this research examined the syntactic characteristics of /haj/ sentence structure and clarified that it functions as the auxiliary verb representing the meaning of benefit or service. Korean ‘주다’ that corresponds to this has the form of being connected to the main verb by ‘아/어.’ In the Thai language, the noun phrase that comes after /haj/ becomes the beneficiary, and in the Korean language, the direct object or the indirect object becomes the beneficiary. When the noun clause other than the noun phrase appears after the auxiliary verb /haj/ while having the sentence structure similar to Thai /haj/ auxiliary verb sentence structure, /haj/ functions as the conjunction leading the adverbial clause and it corresponds to Korean adverbial element ‘게.’Through this research, considerable similarities and differences in the sentence structure of Thai /haj/ and Korean ‘주다,’ were able to be clarified. The results of this research are expected to be of considerable help to both Korean learners studying the Thai language and Thai learners studying the Korean language.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김기혁, "국어 보조동사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1987
  2. 김기혁, "국어문법연구" (1995), 박이정
  3. 김지은, "우리말 양태용언 구문에 대한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
  4. 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
  5. 서정수, "현대국어문법론" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
  6. 정환승, "태국어", haj, 한국태국학회논총, pp.2000, (8)[DOI]
  7. 정환승, "현대태국어문법론" (2002), 삼지사
  8. 정환승, "태국어 부동사에 관한연구", 한국태국학회논총, (11) (2004)
  9. 최현배, "우리말본" (1980), 정음사
  10. JUNG, Hwan-Seung, "กริยาบอกผลในภาษาไทย", 동남아연구, 6 (1997), 한국외국어대학교 동남아연구소
  11. Noss, Richard B, "Thai Reference Grammar" (1971), Krusapa Ladprao
  12. ฉอ้อน หาระบุตร, "การศึกษาความสัมพันธ์ของคำกริยา 2 คำที่เรียง กันในประโยคภาษาไทย", ~
  13. "ภาควิชาภาษาไทย", 석사
  14. ัชวดี ศรลัมพ์, "การศึกษามโนทัศน์ของคำว่า “เข้า”. วิทยานิพนธ์ ปริญญา", 석사, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย
  15. ชิรวัฒน์ นิจเนตร, "การวิเคราะห์เปรียบเทียบกริยาวลีในภาษาไทยและภาษาอังกฤษ", 석사
  16. ชิรวัฒน์ นิจเนตร, "การวิเคราะห์เปรียบเทียบกริยาวลีในภาษาไทยและภาษาอังกฤษ", 석사
  17. นววรรณ พันธุเมธา, "ไวยากรณ์ภาษาไทย", รุ่งเรืองสาส์นการพิมพ์
  18. นววรรณ พันธุเมธา, "กริยาซ้อน", สตรีสาร, 39(38), pp.104~105
  19. บรรจบ พันธุเมธา, "ลักษณะภาษาไทย", วิทยาลัยรามคำแหง
  20. วิจินตน์ ภาณุพงศ์, "โครงสร้างภาษาไทย ระบบไวยากรณ์", มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง
  21. สุดา รังกุพันธุ์, "กริยารอง ไป และ มา ในภาษาไทย", 석사, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์
  22. โสภาวรรณ แสงไชย, "กริยารอง ขึ้น และ ลง ในภาษาไทย", 석사, ภาควิชาภาษาศาสตร์บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย
  23. อรทัย เดชธำรง, "หน้าที่ของคำกริยา ให้ ในภาษาไทย", 석사, ภาควิชาภาษาไทย

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)