태국 정사에 대한 논쟁: 쑤코타이와 아유타야 건국사
The Question of the Traditional Invention of Thai Official History
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the modernization of the history, most Asian countries believe the invention of oriental tradition has been biased by the imperial ideology. They have set up a political system for the rewriting of the national history by starting with a new view concerning the ancient history. During the process of imperial modernization, Thailand has the imperial biased product concerning the canonized ancient history in which Thai scholars have attempted to rewrite Thai ancient history and reestablish it as the official history over 100 years ago. However, it has neither been adopted as the authoritative history of Thailand nor been circulated in the school textbooks in Thailand. This study attempts to find existence of official Thai history which is based on the fact and reality. This dissertation focuses and tracks down the establish process of Damrong history, in which the modernization used to mislead in order to provoke fundamental problems for no-adoption of the canonized history for the forge both Ramkhamhaeng King epitaph and foundation of the Ayutthaya Kingdom. Also this dissertation proclaims the reason of no-circulating the school textbook regards Thai ancient history as well. This dissertation proves the prolonged Lawo Kingdom for more than 400 years, because Ayutthaya Kingdom has not founded since 1351 but since 1082, which had 9 kings more before PhraRamathibodi First. This dissertation had a different historical period summary regardless of the traditionally inventional history : Iron Age(600 B.C.-A.D. 250), Dvaravati Age(A.D. 600-1100), Lawa Age (A.D. 1100-11C), Ayutthaya Age(11C-18C), Thonburi Age(18C), Ratanakosin Age(since 18C to the present). This dissertation still has the question of start-up of Ayutthay Age and the fact or forge of Ramkhamhaeng King epitaph as a limitation of Thai ancient history.
Abstract
In the modernization of the history, most Asian countries believe the invention of oriental tradition has been biased by the imperial ideology. They have set up a political system for the rewriting of the national history by starting with a new view concerning the ancient history. During the process of imperial modernization, Thailand has the imperial biased product concerning the canonized ancient history in which Thai scholars have attempted to rewrite Thai ancient history and reestablish it as the official history over 100 years ago. However, it has neither been adopted as the authoritative history of Thailand nor been circulated in the school textbooks in Thailand. This study attempts to find existence of official Thai history which is based on the fact and reality. This dissertation focuses and tracks down the establish process of Damrong history, in which the modernization used to mislead in order to provoke fundamental problems for no-adoption of the canonized history for the forge both Ramkhamhaeng King epitaph and foundation of the Ayutthaya Kingdom. Also this dissertation proclaims the reason of no-circulating the school textbook regards Thai ancient history as well. This dissertation proves the prolonged Lawo Kingdom for more than 400 years, because Ayutthaya Kingdom has not founded since 1351 but since 1082, which had 9 kings more before PhraRamathibodi First. This dissertation had a different historical period summary regardless of the traditionally inventional history : Iron Age(600 B.C.-A.D. 250), Dvaravati Age(A.D. 600-1100), Lawa Age (A.D. 1100-11C), Ayutthaya Age(11C-18C), Thonburi Age(18C), Ratanakosin Age(since 18C to the present). This dissertation still has the question of start-up of Ayutthay Age and the fact or forge of Ramkhamhaeng King epitaph as a limitation of Thai ancient history.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김영애, "태국사" (2001), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 김유숙, "람캄행대왕 비문에 관한 연구", 이문논총, 20, pp.23~43 (2000)
- 송정남, "전통시대 베트남과 태국의 관계- 베트남의『大越史記全書』등을 중심으로", 한국태국학회논총, 18(2), pp.37~63 (2012), 한국태국학회
- 이성시, "만들어진 고대" (2010), (주)도서출판 삼인
- 황민혁, "민족주의와 민주적 공론장의 관계 연구 : 자유주의적 민족주의의 의미와 한계", 석사, 정치학, pp.2010
- Bennet Bronson, "Excavation at Chansen and The Cultural Chronology of Protohistoric Central Thailand", Ph.D., pp.1976
- Chales Higham, "Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia" (2002), River Books Ltd
- David k. Wyatt, "Thailand : a short history" (1984), Yaie University Press
- Kennon Breazeale, "The Writings of Prince Damrong Rajanubhab: A Chronology with Annotations" (2008), Foundation for the Promotion of Social Sciences and Humanities Textbooks Project and Toyota Thailand Foundation
- Pasook Indrawooth, "DAVARAVATI" (2004), Aksunssamai
- Rong Syamada, "A History of Thailand" (1977), Thai Watana Paniich
- 吉川利治, "タイ政治史·文化史論集" (2012)
- 石井米雄, "タイにおける「公定史觀」 をめぐって", アユタヤ王朝の首都の呼稱にっいての覚書, 2(13), pp.67~76 (1999)
- 石井米雄, "タイ近世史硏究序說", pp.176~185 (1999), 岩波書店
- แทพ สุนทรศารทูล, "วิจัยข้อแท็จจริงเรื่องศีลาจารึกอักษรไทยของพ่อขุนรามคําแหง" (1991), สํานักพิมพ์พระนารายณ์
- ศรีศักร วัลลิโภคม, "กรุงอโยธยาไนประวัติศาสตร์" (1966), สังคมศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ได้จัดทําฉบัพิเศษ ๓นครหลวงของไทย
- ศรีศักร วัลลิโภคม, "ประวัติศาสตร์ โบราณคดี: เมืองอู่ทอง" (2006), ด่านสุทธาการพิมพ์
- สุจิตต์ วงษ์เทศ, "พระเจ้าอู่ทองไม่ได้มาจากเมืองอู่ทอง" (2002), สํานักพิมพ์มติชน
- "ชาวมอญในประเทสไทย วิเคราะห์ฐานะและบทบาทในสังคมไทย ตั้งแต่ สมัยอยุธยาตอนกลางถึงสมัยรัตนโกสินทร์ตอนต้น" (1976), จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
- สุรพล ดําริห์กุล, "ประวัติศาสตร์และศิลปะหริภุญไชย" (2004), ด่านสุทธารพิมพ์
- "중국의 동북공정과 한국의 대응 방안", ~
- "안동영 - 사학과 20040209", ~
- "<현지 답사> 1998 년 8 월 5 일 - 25 일 쑤코타이, 치앙마이, 치앙라이, 코랏 (중북부, 동부)", ~ (1998)
- "<현지 답사> 1999 년 1 월 12 일 - 2 월 3 일 차이야, 나컨씨탐마랏, 펫부리, 얄라, 빳따니 (서부, 남부)", ~ (1999)
- "<현지 답사> 2011 년 8 월 7 일 - 20 일 퐁뜩, 쿠부어, 우텅 (서부 고대유적지)", ~ (2011)