태국의 탐마라차(Dhammaraja)와 테와라차(Devaraja) 특성 비교: 정치적 정통성과 효율성을 중심으로
Dhammaraja vs Devaraja: Political Legitimacy and Political Efficiency
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the Ayutthaya Kingdom, Dhammaraja kingship based on Buddhis m and Devaraja kingship based on Hindu- Brahmanism had coexisted. Mos t of current studies showed that the two kingships buttressed the political au thority of kingship. While Dhammaraja kingship provided a political legiti macy to kingship, Devaraja kingship gave the divinity to kingship. And suc h studies especially emphasize that the legitimacy of Ayutthayan kingship was from Dhammaraja. Most of such studies also emphasize the negative aspects of Devaraja kin gship regarding authoritarianism, however, they did not almost clarify the Devaraja’s role on the strong goverment for the power of the state. Conside ring the trend of such current studies, my research analyzes what is the char acteristics of the two kingships using the concept of political stability, legiti macy and effectiveness. According to Lipset, the stability of any specific political system depend s on the effectiveness and legitimacy of its political system. Effectiveness i s judged according to how well the system satisfies the basic functions of g overnment as measured by reactions of most of the population and such po werful groups as business or the military forces. Legitimacy includes the ca pacity to produce and maintain a belief that the existing political institution s, or forms, are the most appropriate for the society. Lipset also insists that 태국의 탐마라차(Dhammaraja)와 테와라차(Devaraja) 특성 비교:정치적 정통성과 효율성을 중심으로 235any political system provides a plus response to both effectiveness and legit imacy are stable systems, and on the contrary, the opposing case is unstable With this hypothesis, my research focuses on why some kings were succ essful in acquiring both legitimacy and effectiveness and the others were n ot? In other words, some kings showed the plus responses to both legitimac y and effectiveness, so they became successful Dhammaraja and Devaraja. However, others showed the minus responses to both legitimacy and effecti veness, so they were not successful. This is the fundamental bases for my r esearch. Later on, I’ll explore that politically effective Devarajas without le gitimacy created political instability, legitimate Dhammaraja without politi cal effectiveness were also created political instability. The kings fall under this research are 3 kings who are King Trailokanat in the Ayutthaya Kingd om, King Taksin in the Thonburi Kingdom and Rama 1 in the Rattanakosin Kingdom.
Abstract
Since the Ayutthaya Kingdom, Dhammaraja kingship based on Buddhis m and Devaraja kingship based on Hindu- Brahmanism had coexisted. Mos t of current studies showed that the two kingships buttressed the political au thority of kingship. While Dhammaraja kingship provided a political legiti macy to kingship, Devaraja kingship gave the divinity to kingship. And suc h studies especially emphasize that the legitimacy of Ayutthayan kingship was from Dhammaraja. Most of such studies also emphasize the negative aspects of Devaraja kin gship regarding authoritarianism, however, they did not almost clarify the Devaraja’s role on the strong goverment for the power of the state. Conside ring the trend of such current studies, my research analyzes what is the char acteristics of the two kingships using the concept of political stability, legiti macy and effectiveness. According to Lipset, the stability of any specific political system depend s on the effectiveness and legitimacy of its political system. Effectiveness i s judged according to how well the system satisfies the basic functions of g overnment as measured by reactions of most of the population and such po werful groups as business or the military forces. Legitimacy includes the ca pacity to produce and maintain a belief that the existing political institution s, or forms, are the most appropriate for the society. Lipset also insists that 태국의 탐마라차(Dhammaraja)와 테와라차(Devaraja) 특성 비교:정치적 정통성과 효율성을 중심으로 235any political system provides a plus response to both effectiveness and legit imacy are stable systems, and on the contrary, the opposing case is unstable With this hypothesis, my research focuses on why some kings were succ essful in acquiring both legitimacy and effectiveness and the others were n ot? In other words, some kings showed the plus responses to both legitimac y and effectiveness, so they became successful Dhammaraja and Devaraja. However, others showed the minus responses to both legitimacy and effecti veness, so they were not successful. This is the fundamental bases for my r esearch. Later on, I’ll explore that politically effective Devarajas without le gitimacy created political instability, legitimate Dhammaraja without politi cal effectiveness were also created political instability. The kings fall under this research are 3 kings who are King Trailokanat in the Ayutthaya Kingd om, King Taksin in the Thonburi Kingdom and Rama 1 in the Rattanakosin Kingdom.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김홍구, "태국 불교와 정치적 정통성", 동남아시아 연구, (4) (1996), 한국동남아학회
- 김홍구, "한 권으로 이해하는 THAILAND" (2006), 부산외대 출판부
- 조흥국, "불교군주와 술탄 - 태국과 말레이시아 왕권의 역사" (2004), 전통과 현대
- Almond, G. A., "A Developmental Approach to Political Systems, In World Politics ⅩⅦ" (1965)
- Apter, David E., "Politics of Modernization" (1969), Univ. of Chicago Press
- Assavavirulhakarn, Prapod, "The Ascendancy of Theravada Buddhism in Southeast Asia" (2010), Silkworm books
- Charnvit, Kesetsiri, "Buddhism and Political Integration in Early Ay udhya, 1350-1488", Journal of the Faculty of Archaeology, 4(4) (1974), Silapak orn University
- Dhani Nivat, "The Old Siamese Conception of the Monarchy", Journ al of the the Siam Society, 36(2) (1955)
- Dhani Nivat, "The Reconstruction of Rama 1", Journal of the the Siam Society Selected Articles, 4 (1959)
- Girling, John L.S., "Thailand: Society and Politics" (1981), Cornell University Press
- Han, Tingjie, "Buddhism and Politics of Two Dynasties of Ayodhy a and Tonburi in Thailand", International Conference on Buddhist S ocieties in Stability and Crisis (1994), Institute of Thai Studies, Chulalongk orn University
- Ishii, Yoneo, "Sangha, State and Society: Thai Buddhism in History" (1986), The University of Hawaii Press
- Lipset, Seymour Martin, "Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics" (1960), Feffer & Simons Inc
- Reynolds, Craig James, "The Buddhist Monkhood in Nineteenth Cen tury Thailand", 박사, pp.1973
- Syamananda, Rong, "A History of Thailand" (1973), Thai Watana P anich Co., Ltd
- Khwaam-khit kaan-myang lae sangkhom thai (Thai Political and Social Thought), "Sombat, Jantharawong", Thamma sat University, ~, pp.Thai Khadi Institute, Research Document no. 6 (1980)
- Buddhism and Politics in Thailand: A Study o f Socio-Political Change and Political Activism of the Thai Sangha, "Suksamran, Somboon", Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, ~ (1982)
- Suksamran, Somboon, "Buddhism, Political Authority, and Legitima cy in Thailand and Cambodia, In Buddhist Trends in Southeast Asia" (1993), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
- Xuto, Somsakdi, "Government and Politics of Thailand" (1987), Oxford University Press
- Terwiel, B. J., "Thailand’s Political History: From the Fall of Ayutthay a to Recent Times" (2005), River Books
- Wales, H.G. Quaritch, "Ancient Siamese Government and Administration" (1965), Paragon
- Wenk, Klaus, "The Restoration of Thailand under Rama 1, 1782-1809" (1809), Univ. of Arizoana Press
- พิเศศ บูรณะสมบัติ, "ประวัติศาสตร์การปกครองของไทย(태국통치사). บริษัท รวมสาส์น จำกัด" (2004), บริษัท รวมสาส์น จำกัด
- สุดารา สุจฉายา, "ประวัติศาสตร์สมัยธนบุรี(톤부리사)" (2007), สำนักพิมพ์สารคดี
- มหาวิทยาลัย สุโขทัย ธรรมาธิราช, "ประวัติสาสตร์สังคม และ การเมืองไทย(사회정치사)" (1990), สำนักพิมพ์ มหาวิทยาลัย สุโขทัย ธรรมาธิราช
- เจริญ ไชยชนะ, "ปูมประวัติสาสตร์ ไทย(태국사)" (1969), เกษมบรรณกิจ
- ชั้น สร้อยพิสุทธ์, "ปูมประวัติสาสตร์ ไทย(태국사)" (1950), สำนักพิมพ์ชูสิน
- เฉลิม อยู่เวียงชัย, "สมัยกรุงธนบุรี สมัยกรุงรัตนโกสินทร์(톤부리, 랏따나꼬씬역사)" (1973), หน่วยศึกษานิเทศก์กรมการฝึกหัดครู
- แสงสม เกษมศรี, "ภาคผนวก ประวัติสาสตร์ ไทย(태국사)" (1960), ไทยวัฒนาพานิช
- วิทย์ พิณคันเงิน, "ประมวลสารคดีไทย (실록태국)" (1962), โอเดียนสโตร์
- เสทื้อน ศุภโสภณ, "ประวัติสาสตร์ ไทย เล่ม 1 (태국사)" (1971), อักศรเจริญ ทัศน์
- เอี๊ยะมิ้ง และประยูร พิศนาคะ, "สมเด็จพระจอมเกลา(라마 4 세). แปลโดย พ.อ. นิจ ทองโส" (1977), ร.พ. สมาคมสังคมศาสตร์แห่งประเทศไทย