본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 도로자본의 최적수준과 사회적 기여

Social Contribution and Optimal Level of Road Capital in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

정책 결정자들에게 더 좋은 정보를 제공하기 위해서는 도로 투자가 국가 경제성장과 경쟁력의 영향을 연구를 통해 분석하여야 하며, 특정 산업과 도로 투자 비용과 편익의 관계를 파악하기 위한 연구가 필요하다. 집합분석의 결과를 이용한 도로자본의 분석 결과는 아직 최적수준에서 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문의 연구 결과를 통해 검토해 보면 우리나라의 1970년대에는 도로자본이 매우 부족한 것으로 나타났으며, 1970년대 후반으로 갈수록 비율은 급격하게 감소하였지만, 분석기간 동안 도로자본의 투자는 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 도로자본의 총요소 생산성 성장률의 공헌도는 총산업에서 양(+)으로 나타났으며, 산업에서 총요소 생산성에 공헌 정도는 비체화적 기술변화, 외생 수요, 그리고 도로자본 효과 순으로 나타났다. 또한, 도로자본의 총요소생산성의 공헌도는 분석기간에서 0.13으로 기존연구에 비해 비교적 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 도시 내 통행, 근거리 및 지역 간 수송을 담당하는 도로는 지속적인 투자가 필요한 것은 자명한 사실이며, 향후 우리나라 경제의 악영향을 최소화하기 위해서는 보다 계획적이고 지속적인 도로 투자가 필요할 것이다.

Abstract

In order to better inform decision-makers, more work should be done. More work should be done to analyze how Road investments and the provinces impact national economic growth and competitiveness. More work should also be conducted to understand the costs and benefits of Road investments and their industry specific impacts across national. Using a set of “aggregated” estimates, we calculated the “optimum” level of road capital and compared it with its actual level over the period 1970~2007. This results emerges is that the ratio of the optimum to actual road capital, measured by road, was high at beginning of the period 1970s and declined 2000s. There appears to be evidence of under-investment in road capital. That is continuous and premeditated investment for road which lead to saving time and finance. Contribution of the road capital of total factor productivity growth was positive (+) in the total industrial. The degree of contribution to total factor productivity growth in the total industry was disembodied technical change, an exogenous demand effect, road capital effect. In addition, Road capital contribution in about 0.13 which compared with reported estimates in the literature is relatively small.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 국우각, "도로 투자의 사회적 수익률 : 도로 투자의 최적 수준", 박사, 교통공학, pp.2008
  2. 고용노동부, "노동연감" (1970), 고용노동부
  3. 통계청, "국부통계", 통계청, ~ (1968)
  4. 경제활동인구조사, "통계청", 통계청, ~ (1970)
  5. 表鶴吉, "한국의 산업별? 자산별 자본스톡추계(1953~2000)", 한국경제의 분석, 9(1), pp.203~274 (2003), 한국경제의 분석패널
  6. 한국은행, "산업연관표", 한국은행, ~ (1970)
  7. 한국은행, "국민계정" (2004), 한국은행
  8. 기업경영분석, "한국은행", 한국은행, ~ (1970)
  9. 행정안전부, "행정안전통계연보", 행정안전부, ~ (2008)
  10. 행정자치부, "행정자치통계연보", 행정자치부, ~ (1998)
  11. The Impact of Public Infrastructure on the Productivity of the Chilean Economy, "Albala-Bertrand, J. M.", Queen Mary University of London, ~, pp.Queen Mary University of London Department of Economics Working Paper no.435 (2001)
  12. Measuring the Contribution of Public Infrastructure Capital in Sweden, "Berndt, Ernst R.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.Working Papers Series no.3842 (1991)
  13. Ezcurra, Roberto., "Public Capital, Regional Productivity and Spatial Spillovers", The Annals of Regional Science, 39, pp.471~494 (2005)
  14. Fernald, John, "How Productive is Infrastructure? Distinguishing Reality and Illusion with a Panel of US Industries" (1992), Harvard University
  15. Macroeconomic and Welfare Effect of Public Infrastructure Investment in Five Latin American Countries, "Gustavo, Carlos", Institute for Advanced Development Studies, ~, pp.Development Working paper Series no.14 (2007)
  16. Public Capital and its Contribution to The Productivity Performance of The Canadian Business Sector, "Harchaoui, Tarek M.", Micro-Economic Analysis Division, ~, pp.Economic Analysis Research Paper Series Statistics Canada no.11F0027-no.017 (2003)
  17. Kaizuka, K., "Public Goods and Decentralization of Production", Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, pp.118~120 (1965)
  18. Kamps, C., "The Dynamic Effects of Public Capital: VAR Evidence for 22 OECD Countries", International Tax and Public Finance, 12, pp.533~558 (2005)
  19. Karagag, M. A., "Growth of Factor Productivity in the Turkish Manufacturing Industry at Provincial Level", Regional Studies, 39(2), pp.213~223 (2005)
  20. Moreno, Rosina., "Public Infrastructure and the Performance of Manufacturing Industries : Short-and Long-Run Effects", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32(1), pp.97~121 (2002)
  21. Morrison, Catherine, "State Infrastructure and Productive Performance", American Economic Review, 86(5), pp.1095~1111 (1992)
  22. The Effects of Public Infrastructure and R&D Capital on the Cost Structure and Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Industries, "Nadiri, M. I", C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University, ~, pp.Working Papers 91-57 (1991)
  23. Contribution of Highway Capital to Industry and National Productivity Growth, "Nadiri, M. I.", Federal High way Administration, ~, pp.Work Order Number BAT-94-008 (1996)
  24. Nadiri, M. I., "Technical Change, Returns to Scale and Productivity Slowdown", American Econmic Review, 71(2), pp.314~319 (1981)
  25. Nadiri, M. I., "The Structure of Production, Technological Change, and the Rate of Growth of Total Factor Productivity in U.S. Bell System, In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries" (1981), Academic Press
  26. Public Infrastructure and Regional Asymmetries in Spain, "Pereira, A. M.", College of William and Mary, ~, pp.Working Papers no.46 (2006)
  27. Satya, Paul., "Public Infrastructure and the Productive Performance of Canadian Manufacturing Industries", Southern Economic Journal, 70(4), pp.998~1011 (2004)
  28. Shah, A., "Dynamics of Public Infrastructure, Industrial Productivity and Profitability", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(1), pp.28~36 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)