19세기 초중엽 중앙아시아 정치 환경 변화와 부하라-히바 관계
The Politics in Nineteenth-century Central Asia and the Relationship between Bukhara and Khiva
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The history of the “tribal dynasties” of Bukhara and Khiva in the nineteenth century remains little studied. One of the primary reasons for the lack of scholarly attention on the Bukharan Manghit and the Khivan Qungrat dynasties seems to lie in the prejudice that the nineteenth century was the period of decline and “Oriental despotism,” which were clearly shaped by Orientalism underlying the previous scholarship, both the West and the Russia-Soviet. In the same context, the relationship between Bukhara and Khiva in the early and mid-nineteenth century has been disregarded as “feudal” conflict of the two Oriental despotic dynasties. However, in light of changes that occurred in nineteenth century Central Asia, in relation to the unprecedented trade increase throughout the Eurasian continent, the Bukhara-Khivan relations should be reevaluated primarily from the perspective of Central Asia’s political and social transformations. Traditionally, the Abū’l Khayrids in Mā warā al-nahr and the ʿArabshāhids in Khwārazm, each established in the early sixteenth century, had maintained a political rivalry for centuries. The tradition of political competition continued even after the Manghits in Bukhara and the Qungrats in Khiva replaced the two Chinggisid dynasties in the late eighteenth century. However, such a rivalry began to be conditioned by new political factors that emerged under the new circumstances in the nineteenth century. The huge growth in caravan trade across Central Asia brought Russia as an important player into the region even decades before the Russian Empire’s expansion in the 1860s. The tribal resurgency in Central Asia accompanied by the establishment of another independent tribal dynasty in the Ferghana valley, or the Khoqand Khanate, had a crucial impact on the Bukhara-Khiva relationship. In addition, the Qājār Persia’s activities, which were deeply affected by the world-wide confrontation between the Russia and the British Empires, influenced Central Asia’s political situation particularly regarding the Turkmen tribal groups in Merv. The Turkmens’ change of allegiance from Khiva to Bukhara proved critical for the hegemony of the latter over the former. In conclusion, the Bukhara-Khiva relations in the early and mid-nineteenth century show that Central Asia was never isolated but closely connected to the other parts of the world, undergoing various levels of political changes and transformations.
Abstract
The history of the “tribal dynasties” of Bukhara and Khiva in the nineteenth century remains little studied. One of the primary reasons for the lack of scholarly attention on the Bukharan Manghit and the Khivan Qungrat dynasties seems to lie in the prejudice that the nineteenth century was the period of decline and “Oriental despotism,” which were clearly shaped by Orientalism underlying the previous scholarship, both the West and the Russia-Soviet. In the same context, the relationship between Bukhara and Khiva in the early and mid-nineteenth century has been disregarded as “feudal” conflict of the two Oriental despotic dynasties. However, in light of changes that occurred in nineteenth century Central Asia, in relation to the unprecedented trade increase throughout the Eurasian continent, the Bukhara-Khivan relations should be reevaluated primarily from the perspective of Central Asia’s political and social transformations. Traditionally, the Abū’l Khayrids in Mā warā al-nahr and the ʿArabshāhids in Khwārazm, each established in the early sixteenth century, had maintained a political rivalry for centuries. The tradition of political competition continued even after the Manghits in Bukhara and the Qungrats in Khiva replaced the two Chinggisid dynasties in the late eighteenth century. However, such a rivalry began to be conditioned by new political factors that emerged under the new circumstances in the nineteenth century. The huge growth in caravan trade across Central Asia brought Russia as an important player into the region even decades before the Russian Empire’s expansion in the 1860s. The tribal resurgency in Central Asia accompanied by the establishment of another independent tribal dynasty in the Ferghana valley, or the Khoqand Khanate, had a crucial impact on the Bukhara-Khiva relationship. In addition, the Qājār Persia’s activities, which were deeply affected by the world-wide confrontation between the Russia and the British Empires, influenced Central Asia’s political situation particularly regarding the Turkmen tribal groups in Merv. The Turkmens’ change of allegiance from Khiva to Bukhara proved critical for the hegemony of the latter over the former. In conclusion, the Bukhara-Khiva relations in the early and mid-nineteenth century show that Central Asia was never isolated but closely connected to the other parts of the world, undergoing various levels of political changes and transformations.
참고문헌 (35)
- Aboul-Ghazi Behadour Khan, "Histoire des Mogols et des Tatares" (1874), Imprimerie de l’Académie Impériale des sciences
- Alimova, Dilorom Agzamovna, "Istoriia Uzbekistana (XVI-pervaia polovina XIX veka)" (2012), Fan
- Annanepesov, M., "History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Volume VI, Towards the contemporary period from the mid-nineteenth to the end of the twentieth century" (2005), Unesco Publishing
- Becker, Seymour, "Russia’s Protectorates in Central Asia: Bukhara and Khiva, 1865-1924" (1968), Harvard University Press
- Bregel, Yuri, "The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: The Chinggisid Age" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Bunakov, E. V., "K istorii snoshenii Rossii s sredneaziatskimi khanstvami v XIX v", Sovetskoe vostokovedenie, 2, pp.5~26 (1941)
- Burton, Audrey, "The Bukharans, a Dynastic, Diplomatic, and Commercial History 1550-1702" (1997), St. Martin’s Press
- Demezon, P.I., "Zapiski o Bukharskom Khanstve: Otchety" (1983), Glavnaia Redaktsiia Vostochnoi Literatury
- Eden, Jeff, "Slavery and Empire in Central Asia" (2018), Cambridge University Press
- Efremov, F., "Stranstvovanie Filippa Efremova: v Kirgizskoi stepi, Bukharii, Khive, Persii, Tibete i Indii i vozrashchenie ego ottuda chrez’ Angliiu v Rossiiu" (1811), Universitetskaia Tipografiia
- Evans, John L., "Mission of N. P. Ignat’ev to Khiva and Bukhara in 1858" (1984), Oriental Research Partners
- Hopkirk, Peter, "The Great Game: The Struggle from Empire in Central Asia" (1994), Kodansha International
- Ivanov, Pavel P., "Vosstanie kitaĭ-kipchakov v Bukharskom khanstve 1821-25 gg.:Istochniki i opyt ikh issledovaniya" (1937), Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR
- Khalfin, N. A., "Politika Rossii v Srednei Azii (1857-1868)" (1960), Nauka
- Khalfin, N. A., "Rossiia i Khanstva Sredneii Azii (Pervaia polovina XIX veka)" (1974), Nauka
- Khanykov, N. V., "Opisanie Bukharskago Khanstva" (1843), Tipografiia Imperatorskoi Akadmii Nauk
- 이광태, "The Myth of the Butcher Amir: Tribal Politics and Early Modernization in Nineteenth Century Central Asia", 박사, pp.2020
- Levi, Scott C., "The Rise and Fall of Khoqand 1709-1876: Central Asia in the Golden Age" (2017), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Levi, Scott C., "Islamic Central Asia: An Anthology of Historical Sources" (2010), Indiana University Press
- Meiendorf, E. K., "Puteshestvie iz Orenburga v Bukharu" (1975), Nauka
- Mir Abdoul Kerim, "Histoire de l’Asie centrale (Afghanistan, Boukhara, Khiva, Khoqand) depuis les dermière années du règne de Nadir Châr(1153) jusqu’en 1233 de l’Hégire (1740-1818)" (1876), E. Leroux
- Mirza Shems Bukhari, "O nekotorykh sobytiakh v Bukhare, Khokande i Kashgare. Zapiski Mirzy Shemsa Bukhari. Persidskii Tekst i perevod V. V. Grigor’eva" (1861), Tipografii Universiteta
- Muḥammad Ḥakīm Khān, "Muntakhab al-Tawārīkh, 2 vols" (2009), Research institute for languages and cultures of Asia and Africa, ILCAA
- Muḥammad Riḍā Mīrāb Āgahī, "Riyāḍ al-Dawlah", Institut Vostokovedeniia Rossiskoi Akademii Nauk, ~
- Muḥammad Riḍā Mīrāb Āgahī, "Zubdat at-Tavārīkh" (2016), Abu Rayhon Beruniy Nomidagi Sharq Qo’lyozmalari Markazi
- Muḥammad Yaʿqūb, "Gulshan al-Mulūk. Abu Rayhon Beruniy Nomidagi Sharq Qo’lyozmalari Markazi", pp.1507
- Nebol’sin, P. I., "Ocherki torgovli Rossii v Srednei Aziei", Zapiski Imperatorskago Russkago Geograficheskago Obshchestva, 10, pp.1~373 (1855)
- Rosliakov, A. A., "Alamany", Sovetskaia etnografiia, 2, pp.41~53 (1955)
- Rozhkova, M. K., "Ekonomicheskie sviazi Rossii so Srednei Aziei, 40-60-e gody XIX veka" (1962), Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSR
- Sela, Ron, "Writing Travel in Central Asian History", pp.68~88 (2013), Indiana University Press
- Shir Muhammad Mirab Munis, "Firdaws al-Iqbāl:History of Khorezm" (1999), Brill
- Weinerman, Eli, "The Polemics between Moscow and Central Asians on the Decline of Central Asia and Tsarist Russia’s Role in the History of the Region", The Slavonic and East European Review, 71(3), pp.428~451 (1993)
- Wood, William A., "The Sariq Turkmens of Merv and the Khanate of Khiva in the Early Nineteenth Century", 박사, pp.1998
- Manūchehr Sotūda, "Ẓ afar Nāma-i Khusravī" (1999), Āyīne-yi Mirath
- Zhukovskii, S. V., "Snosheniia Rossii s Bukharoi i Khivoi za poslednee trekhsotletie" (1915), Tipo-litografiia N. I. Evstigneeva