能動型「∼テアル」」構文と「∼テオク」構文との比較-共起環境を中心に-
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I compared active model “∼テアル” sentence structure with the “∼テオク” sentence structure, said to expressing the meaning of 'Maintenance of the effect'and ‘preparations’, and I considered difference in each co-occurrence environment. In particular, I pointed out the problem with a conclusion of Chang(2010) which analyzed the comparison about the “∼テオク” sentence structure and All of “∼テアル" sentence structures. I hypothesized that the result will change when I limited a consideration object to only active model “∼テアル” sentence structure, and I performed the comparison analysis of both sentence structures in form to perform an example investigation, and to inspect it. As a result, it was confirmed that both sentence structures showed an aspect of the co-occurrence environment where they were considerably similar to. Such result was different from Chang(2010) which insisted on “∼テアル” sentence structure and “∼テオク” sentence structure being considerably heterogeneous marks in most items of the co-occurrence environment. For example, in Chang(2010), “∼テアル”sentence structure insisted that there were extremely few ratios to show an agent in comparison with “∼テオク” sentence structure. However, according to the consideration result of this report, I showed around 20% in both sentence structures, and the way of appearing in agents was able to confirm the aspect that they were similar to.
Abstract
In this paper, I compared active model “∼テアル” sentence structure with the “∼テオク” sentence structure, said to expressing the meaning of 'Maintenance of the effect'and ‘preparations’, and I considered difference in each co-occurrence environment. In particular, I pointed out the problem with a conclusion of Chang(2010) which analyzed the comparison about the “∼テオク” sentence structure and All of “∼テアル" sentence structures. I hypothesized that the result will change when I limited a consideration object to only active model “∼テアル” sentence structure, and I performed the comparison analysis of both sentence structures in form to perform an example investigation, and to inspect it. As a result, it was confirmed that both sentence structures showed an aspect of the co-occurrence environment where they were considerably similar to. Such result was different from Chang(2010) which insisted on “∼テアル” sentence structure and “∼テオク” sentence structure being considerably heterogeneous marks in most items of the co-occurrence environment. For example, in Chang(2010), “∼テアル”sentence structure insisted that there were extremely few ratios to show an agent in comparison with “∼テオク” sentence structure. However, according to the consideration result of this report, I showed around 20% in both sentence structures, and the way of appearing in agents was able to confirm the aspect that they were similar to.
참고문헌 (33)
- 安藤節子, "コーパスに見るテアル表現の意味用法と共起動詞 : 日本語教育", 学習の観点から, 2012, pp.(8), ~[DOI]
- 李京保, "東京外国語大学日本研究教育年報", 東京外国語大学日本研究教育年, 8 (2004), 東京外国語大学日本過程·留学生課共編
- 李光秀, "日本語「てある」文의 構造", 日語日文學硏究, 38 (2001), 韓国日語日文学会
- 浦木貴和, ""テアル" 構文に関する考察", 日本語·日本文化研究, 16 (2006), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 浦木貴和, "テ形節とスケール構造からみた"テアル" 構文の意味分析", 日本語·日本文化研究, 20 (2010), 大阪外大日本語講座
- 呉幸栄, ""してある"と"しておく"の接近 : 《第2"してある"動詞》との対応を中心に", 大東文化大学日本文学会, (51) (2012), 大東文化大学日本文学会
- 神永正史, ""テアル"構文の動詞構成 : 存在文との近さから"", 筑波日本語研究, 13 (2008), 筑波大学大学院日本語学研究室
- 杉村 泰, "形式と意味の研究-"テアル"構文の2種類"", 日本語教育, 91 (1996), 日本語教育学会
- 杉村 泰, "意思性のない"テアル"構文について", 言語文化論集, 25(1) (2002)
- 齋藤 茂, ""テアル"構文と対象の格表示", 言語と文明, 6 (2008), 麗澤大学大学院言語教育研究科
- 齋藤茂, "テアル"構文と受動表現との使い分け-結果を基に動作が行われたと推論することによる制約-", 麗澤大学紀要, 90 (2010), 麗澤大学
- 鈴木泉子, ""テアル"構文について-モノの存在と効果の存在-", 津田塾大学紀要, 32 (2002)
- 鈴木泉子, "格交替における意味の関与-"テアル"構文を足掛かりとして-", 津田塾大学紀要, 36 (2004)
- 張賢善, "てある"に関する一考察-"~ている"との関係において-", 日本研究教育年報, 12 (2008), 東京外国語大学
- 張賢善, ""~てある"文と"~ておく"文の違いについて : 文法構造の観点から", 言語·地域文化研究, 16 (2010), 東京外国語大学大学院
- 崔炳奎, "日本語의 結果相硏究-"してある"의 意味分析을 中心으로-", 日本學報, 28 (1992), 韓国日本学会
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味" (1984), くろしお出版
- 中尚己, "コーパス·ドライブン·アプローチによる日本語教育文法研究-"てある"と""~テオク"構文"を例として-, In 日本語教育文法のための多様なアプローチ" (2011), ひつじ書房
- 노현지, "「テアル」構文の指導法 : 中級レベルを中心にして", 석사, 일어교육, pp.2008
- 富田美知子, "有対他動詞の自動詞表現と受身表現", 人文論究, 56 (1993), 北海道教育大学函館人文学会
- 益岡隆志, ""ーてある"構文の文法", 言語研究, 86 (1984)
- 益岡隆志, "命題の文法" (1987), くろしお出版
- 村上三寿, "動詞のうけみのかたちにおける結果相, In ことばの科学3" (1989)
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアル形の意味-テイル形との関係において", 言語, 28, pp.9~ (1998)
- 原沢伊都夫, "テアルの意味分析-意図性の観点から-", 日本語文法, 5, pp.1~ (2005)
- 배은정, "韓���人���本��学����と日本語��語��者における 結果相を表す表現の認識度の違いについて -AガVラレテイル文とAガVテアル文を中心に-", 일어일문학, 40(40), pp.73~90 (2008), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "結果及び状態������す「AガVテアル｣文と 「AガVラレテイル｣文の比較分析", 日本語文學, 1(39), pp.49~69 (2008), 한국일본어문학회
- 배은정, "「書く」・「置く」を述語とする「AガVラレテイル」文と 「AガVテアル文」の意味特徴の比較 -日本語教育の側面から-", 일어일문학, (42), pp.137~157 (2009), 대한일어일문학회
- 배은정, "韓国人日本語学習者における「テアル」構文の理解度分析-中級以上の学習者を対象に-", 일본어교육연구, 26(26), pp.91~110 (2013), 한국일어교육학회
- 배은정, "日本語文法教材における「テアル」構文の記述内容分析", 일어일문학, 26(59), pp.135~153 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
- 森田良行, "基礎日本語" (1977), 角川書店
- 副島 健作, "シテアル再考--他動性の観点から", 留学生教育, 6 (2009), 琉球大学留学生センター
- 山崎恵, "~ておく"と"てある"の関連性について", 日本語教育, 88, pp.88~88 (1996)