본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일･한어 사동표현의 대응 양상과 史的 변화― 20세기 초기 이후 일･한 한･일 대역 자료를 중심으로 ―

The Corresponding Aspect and Historical Change of Causative Expression in Korean and Japanese Languages: Focus on Translated Data after the 20th Century

유수연
한국일본어교육학회 (The Japanese Education Association Of Korea)|2017.03|日本語敎育 (Journal of Japanese Language Education Association)|제79호|pp. 59-73|DOI 10.26591/jpedu.2017..79.005

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

비교 연구통시적 연구Comparative studyTranslationsDiachronic study사동표현과 비 사동표현대역 자료동사의 성격Causative and Non󰠏causativeProperty of the verb
주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study compared and examined cases where causative expressions in the Korean and Japanese languages correspond to non󰠏causative forms in each translation data set of Japanese translated with the Korean original and the Korean translation with the Japanese original over 100 years. The methods of this study are presented as follows: The periods of this study were divided into Period 1 (the early 20th century: 1900󰠏1930) and Period 2 (the late 20th century:1980󰠏present) and Japanese translation and Korean translation data in each period were selected and investigated. From the data obtained, this study targeted only non󰠏causative expressions that corresponded to causative expressions. Finally, this study examined the characteristics(morphological and semantic) of the causative expressions in each period and corresponding aspects.The results are presented as follows: 1. In Period 2, both languages showed diverse corresponding aspects including transitive verbs, giving and receiving verbs, intransitive verbs and passive verbs, and according to the period, their frequency of usage changed. 2. In cases when causative expressions in the Japanese language were involved with possessions as objects, when mimetic expressions were included, and when causative expressions of emotive and sense verbs corresponded to causative expressions, transitive verbs, passive verbs and intransitive verbs were used in the Korean language. 3. In Period 2, the form of ‘main verb + auxiliary verb’ in the Korean language that correspond to causative expressions in the Japanese language increased. 4. In causative expressions in the Korean language, in cases when animate subjects and passive subjects and state change verbs were used for causative expressions, in the corresponding Japanese language, passive expressions with a passive subject as a subject were used, which indicates that causation and passivity were related in the Japanese language.

Abstract

This study compared and examined cases where causative expressions in the Korean and Japanese languages correspond to non󰠏causative forms in each translation data set of Japanese translated with the Korean original and the Korean translation with the Japanese original over 100 years. The methods of this study are presented as follows: The periods of this study were divided into Period 1 (the early 20th century: 1900󰠏1930) and Period 2 (the late 20th century:1980󰠏present) and Japanese translation and Korean translation data in each period were selected and investigated. From the data obtained, this study targeted only non󰠏causative expressions that corresponded to causative expressions. Finally, this study examined the characteristics(morphological and semantic) of the causative expressions in each period and corresponding aspects.The results are presented as follows: 1. In Period 2, both languages showed diverse corresponding aspects including transitive verbs, giving and receiving verbs, intransitive verbs and passive verbs, and according to the period, their frequency of usage changed. 2. In cases when causative expressions in the Japanese language were involved with possessions as objects, when mimetic expressions were included, and when causative expressions of emotive and sense verbs corresponded to causative expressions, transitive verbs, passive verbs and intransitive verbs were used in the Korean language. 3. In Period 2, the form of ‘main verb + auxiliary verb’ in the Korean language that correspond to causative expressions in the Japanese language increased. 4. In causative expressions in the Korean language, in cases when animate subjects and passive subjects and state change verbs were used for causative expressions, in the corresponding Japanese language, passive expressions with a passive subject as a subject were used, which indicates that causation and passivity were related in the Japanese language.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 공미희, "사역성, 타동성, 사역주체, 피사역주체, 직접적, 간접적", 동북아 문화연구, 1(30), pp.345~360 (2012), 동북아시아문화학회
  2. 권승림, "他動詞と使役性", 일본학보, 42, pp.1~17 (1999), 한국일본학회
  3. 권재일, "사동법 실현 방법의 역사", 한글, 211, pp.99~124 (1991), 한글학회
  4. 김건희, "일본어와 한국어의 사동법 대조 연구", 언어연구, 20, pp.1~19 (1999), 서울대 언어연구소
  5. 김건희, "1910-1930년대 활자본 고소설의 몇 가지 문법적 특징 연구", 한국어학, 35, pp.167~193 (2007), 한국어학회
  6. 김병철, "한국근대문학사연구" (1998), 을유문화사
  7. 김형배, "日本語と日本文学", pp.41~53 (2003), 波大学国文国語学科
  8. 류성기, "사역사 사역법의 변화와 사역사 소멸", 국어학, 22, pp.237~258 (1992), 국어학회
  9. 박소영, "한국어 사동문의 의미 해석과 통사구조", 한국어학, 59, pp.169~201 (2013), 한국어학회
  10. 손동주, "프로트타이프론의 입장에서 본 보이스구문의 재검토 - 무대타동사문을 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(21), pp.517~527 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  11. 유민아, "日·韓語 使動 範疇의 比較 硏究 ― 1900-1920년대 日·韓語 對譯資料를 중심으로 ―", 日本語敎育, (69), pp.135~150 (2014), 한국일본어교육학회
  12. 이묘희, "유·무정 관여자에 따른 일·한 사역문의 대조연구", 언어연구, 25(2), pp.325~339 (2009), 한국현대언어학회
  13. 임헌찬, "한일양언어에 있어서의 사역문 양언어가 사역문으로 대응하지 않을 경우", 일어일문학연구, pp.19~48 (1995)
  14. 青木伶子, "動詞の自他" (1976), ひつじ書房
  15. 蟹江美幸, "日本語の使役表現と韓国語表現の比較 ‒翻訳小説を資料とした韓日対照を通して‒", 일본근대학연구, (45), pp.73~92 (2014), 한국일본근대학회
  16. 佐藤里美, "ことばの科学 4", pp.103~157 (1990), むぎ書房
  17. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ" (1982), くろしいお出版
  18. 橋本進吉, "橋本進吉博士著作集" (1931), 岩波書店
  19. 早津恵美子, "使役動詞の認定をめぐって(1)", 環北太平洋の言語, 3, pp.163~182 (1997), 京都大学 大学院文学 研究科
  20. 早津恵美子, "朝倉日本語講座文法Ⅱ", pp.128~150 (2004), 北原保雄監修
  21. 早津恵美子, "使役文と原動文との似通い -使役と原動の対立の弱まり-", 일본어학연구, (36), pp.23~42 (2013), 한국일본어학회
  22. 宮地裕, "現代語古典語助動詞詳說", pp.79~96 (1969), 學燈社
  23. 湯澤辛吉郎, "現代語法の緒問題" (1944), 日本語教育振興会
  24. 湯澤辛吉郎, "口語法精説" (1953), 明治書院
  25. "표준국어대사전", 국립국어연구원
  26. 山縣悌三郞, "リンコンの人物　および其の事業" (1907), 內外出版協會
  27. 육당, "린커언의 인물 및 그 사업" (1910), 소년
  28. 百島操, "爾の隣" (1907), 內外出版協會
  29. 육당, "너의 이웃" (1910), 소년
  30. 坪內逍遙, "ヹニスの商人" (1909), 中央公論社
  31. 이상수, "베니스의 상인" (1924), 조선도서주식회사
  32. 島崎抱月, "人形の家" (1913), 早稻田大學出版部
  33. 염백화, "노라" (1922), 영창서관
  34. 細田源吉, "私の懺悔" (1919), 春秋社
  35. 김억, "나의 참회" (1926), 한성도서주식회사
  36. 나도향, "개벽(開闢)" (1925)
  37. 三枝寿勝, "朝鮮短篇小說選"
  38. 유진오, "김강사와 T교수" (1935), 신동아
  39. 大村益夫, "朝鮮短篇小說選" (1984)
  40. 黒柳徹子, "窓ぎわのトットちゃん(窓ぎわ)" (1981), 講談社
  41. 김난주, "창가의 토토 (토토)" (2000)
  42. 신경숙, "외딴방" (1995), 문학동네
  43. 安宇植, "離れ部屋(部屋)" (2005), 集英社
  44. 황석영, "손님" (2001), 창작과 비평사
  45. 鄭敬謨, "客人(ソンニム)" (2004), 岩波書店
  46. 綿矢りさ, "蹴りたい背中(背中)" (2003), 河出書房新社
  47. 정유리, "발로 차주고 싶은 등짝(등짝)" (2004)
  48. 市川抱司, "いま会いにゆきます(いま)" (2004), 小學館
  49. 양윤옥, "지금 만나러 갑니다(지금)" (2005)
  50. 村上春樹, "アフターダーク" (2004), 講談社
  51. 임홍빈, "어둠의 저편(어둠)" (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

한·일어 사동의 비교연구 – 한국어 장형사동을 중심으로-유수연동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2017 · 제1권 제53호日·韓語 使動 範疇의 比較 硏究 ― 1900-1920년대 日·韓語 對譯資料를 중심으로 ―유수연한국일본어교육학회 · 日本語敎育2014 · 제69호1900-1920년대 日‧韓語 對譯資料를 통한 양 언어 使動表現의 一考察유수연한국일본어교육학회 · 日本語敎育2011 · 제58호한국어와 일본어 사역문의 번역 양상 비교최서영일본연구소 · 일본연구2025 · 제105호유·무정 관여자에 따른 일·한 사역문의 대조연구이묘희, 이지영한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2009 · 제25권 제2호한일 표현구조 차이에 관한 고찰 -자동사⋅타동사 표현을 중심으로-윤상실, 이재은한국일본언어문화학회 · 일본언어문화2013 · 제24호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

韓国人日本語学習者の動詞の意味のプロトタイプの考察 ― 「伝える」、「投げる」、「忘れる」の場合 ―김지혜pp. 1-17韓国人日本語学習者の漢字学習の実力調査 ― 旧JLPT3,4級水準の学習者を対象に ―한선희pp. 19-3250･60대 한국인의 일본식 한자어 사용실태 및 인식에 관한 고찰이덕배, 안동미pp. 33-45最上級の程度副詞「一番」の一考察이정옥pp. 47-57「でる」와 ‘나가다’의 의미에 대한 대조연구윤강구, 조은정pp. 75-87
원문 보기