본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한·일어 사동의 비교연구 – 한국어 장형사동을 중심으로-

A Comparative Study on the Japanese and Korean Causative

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The purpose of this paper is to examine the characteristics of causative in Korean and Japanese by analyzing Korean and Japanese causative both in Korean-Japanese and Japanese-Korean translation data. Especially, focusing on the syntactic causative ‘-key hada’ in korean. For analysis, first the syntactic causative in korean and the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative was selected. And a causative proper use was divided into manipulation, compulsion, permission, and direction. In addition, ‘-key hada’ verb was classified into the main verb, the helping verb, and the pro-verb. The results are presented as follows: the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative includes transitive verb use, causative passive, and other constructs similar to causative, i.e., ようにする(youni suru), and ように命じる(youi meiziru). In the case of manipulation, there existed inanimate subject which was personified. There existed two types of adjectival causative, i.e., causation and non-causation in Korean. Accordingly, the corresponding difference was shown in the Japanese translation. In the case of ‘-key hay cuda’ which was a combined form of syntactic causative and dative verbs, there existed a use without causative meaning. This use was translated into ‘てくれる’(te kureru) and the use with causative meaning was represented by ‘てあげる’(te ageru) in Japanese. There existed a difference between compulsion and directions. Directions in the syntactic causative in korean represented a state change of causee, whereas the compulsion did not. Regarding non-causative sentences which were combined to the verbs of reference meaning, i. e., ‘ように 命じる’, extended use of the verbs was observed with appearance of the verb ‘言う’. Furthermore, imperative forms were revealed to be considered as peripheral causative.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the characteristics of causative in Korean and Japanese by analyzing Korean and Japanese causative both in Korean-Japanese and Japanese-Korean translation data. Especially, focusing on the syntactic causative ‘-key hada’ in korean. For analysis, first the syntactic causative in korean and the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative was selected. And a causative proper use was divided into manipulation, compulsion, permission, and direction. In addition, ‘-key hada’ verb was classified into the main verb, the helping verb, and the pro-verb. The results are presented as follows: the Japanese corresponding to Korean syntactic causative includes transitive verb use, causative passive, and other constructs similar to causative, i.e., ようにする(youni suru), and ように命じる(youi meiziru). In the case of manipulation, there existed inanimate subject which was personified. There existed two types of adjectival causative, i.e., causation and non-causation in Korean. Accordingly, the corresponding difference was shown in the Japanese translation. In the case of ‘-key hay cuda’ which was a combined form of syntactic causative and dative verbs, there existed a use without causative meaning. This use was translated into ‘てくれる’(te kureru) and the use with causative meaning was represented by ‘てあげる’(te ageru) in Japanese. There existed a difference between compulsion and directions. Directions in the syntactic causative in korean represented a state change of causee, whereas the compulsion did not. Regarding non-causative sentences which were combined to the verbs of reference meaning, i. e., ‘ように 命じる’, extended use of the verbs was observed with appearance of the verb ‘言う’. Furthermore, imperative forms were revealed to be considered as peripheral causative.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 권승림, "操作使役について", 일어일문학연구, 68(1), pp.3~20 (2009), 한국일어일문학회
  2. 권승림, "状態性述語の使役化について -日·韓対照研究-", 일본연구, (43), pp.507~524 (2010), 일본연구소
  3. 김영희, "게 하- 사동구문의 세 유형", 국어학, 54, pp.89~120 (1992), 국어학회
  4. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1993), 박이정
  5. 박소영, "한국어 사동문의 의미 해석과 통사구조", 한국어학, 59, pp.169~201 (2013), 한국어학회
  6. 박소영, "한국어 통사사동의 세 유형", 현대문법연구, (74), pp.59~76 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  7. 서정수, "국어문법" (1995), 한양대학교 출판부
  8. 석주연, "신소설 자료에 나타난 어미 ‘-도록’의 의미와 문법- 사동과 명령의 범주를 중심으로 -", 우리말글, 59, pp.25~49 (2013), 우리말글학회
  9. 송영주, "사동문의 한계규정과 그 제약성", 국어교육, 63, pp.133~152 (1988)
  10. 송정근, "구체명사와 결합하는 ‘하다’의 의미 특성에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.123~140 (2007), 한국어의미학회
  11. 이봉, "「許可求め」の使役形の日韓對照硏究-?-(サ)セル? と ?-게 하다?-", 일어일문학연구, 59(1), pp.312~328 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
  12. 이상억, "국어의 사동 피동구문 연구" (1999), 집문당
  13. 이숙, "-게하다 사동구문의 통사적 분석", 어문학논총, 26, pp.291~309 (2007), 국민대학교 어문학연구소
  14. 이호승, "‘X-게 하다’ 사동구성과 구성문법적 접근", 언어학 연구, (42), pp.71~92 (2017), 한국중원언어학회
  15. 최현배, "우리말본" (1955), 정음사
  16. 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
  17. 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法 2" (2009), くろしお出版
  18. 佐藤里美, "ことばの科学 4", pp.103~157 (1990), むぎ書房
  19. 荻野千砂子, "授受動詞の視点の成立", 日本語の研究, 3(3), pp.1~16 (2007), 日本語学会
  20. Lakoff,George, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), Universirt of Chicago Press
  21. Shibatani.M, "The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation", pp.85~126 (2002), John Benjamins
  22. Yang, In-Seok, "Semantics of korean causation", Foundations of language, 14(1), pp.55~87 (1976)
  23. 신경숙, "외딴방" (1995), 문학동네
  24. 安宇植, "離れ部屋" (2005), 集英社
  25. 황석영, "손님" (2001), 창작과 비평사
  26. 鄭敬謨, "客人(ソンニム)" (2004), 岩波書店
  27. 정유리, "발로 차주고 싶은 등짝" (2004)
  28. 綿矢りさ, "蹴りたい背中" (2003), 河出書房新社
  29. 양윤옥, "지금 만나러 갑니다" (2005)
  30. 市川抱司, "いま会いにゆきます" (2004), 小學館
  31. 임홍빈, "어둠의 저편" (2005)
  32. 村上春樹, "アフターダーク" (2004), 講談社
  33. 김난주, "창가의 토토" (2000)
  34. 黒柳徹子, "窓ぎわのトットちゃん"

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)