유·무정 관여자에 따른 일·한 사역문의 대조연구
Contrastive Study of Japanese and Korean Causative Sentences: with Animate and Inanimate Participants
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to clarify unique spheres of Japanese and Korean causative sentences by comparing semantic and structural peculiarities. The results of contrastive analysis of the Japanese and Korean languages are as follows. First of all, in both Japanese and Korean there are cases when a causer in causative sentences is inanimate. This is because description in causative sentences is done from the viewpoint of a causer. It shows the possibility to broaden the concept of a causer. Looking at the differences between the languages, we can notice that there are very important conditions for construction of causative sentences in Japanese, which are the characteristics of a causee and realization of the state of being caused. On the other hand, Korean causative sentences have two forms - "i" type and "-ge hada" type unlike Japanese which has only one form of causative sentences. In summary, we can conclude that while Japanese causative clauses focus on "controllability of causee" and realization of caused action, Korean causative clauses focus on the action of a causer.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify unique spheres of Japanese and Korean causative sentences by comparing semantic and structural peculiarities. The results of contrastive analysis of the Japanese and Korean languages are as follows. First of all, in both Japanese and Korean there are cases when a causer in causative sentences is inanimate. This is because description in causative sentences is done from the viewpoint of a causer. It shows the possibility to broaden the concept of a causer. Looking at the differences between the languages, we can notice that there are very important conditions for construction of causative sentences in Japanese, which are the characteristics of a causee and realization of the state of being caused. On the other hand, Korean causative sentences have two forms - "i" type and "-ge hada" type unlike Japanese which has only one form of causative sentences. In summary, we can conclude that while Japanese causative clauses focus on "controllability of causee" and realization of caused action, Korean causative clauses focus on the action of a causer.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김영일, "사동문의 구조", 국어국문학, 17 (1980), 부산대학교
- 김차균, "우리말 사동과 피동의 의미, in: 우리말의 시제구조와 상인식" (1999), 태학사
- 김형배, "國語의 使動詞研究" (1997), 박이정
- 남기심, "標準國語文法論" (1985), 탑출판사
- 서정수, "國語文法의 研究Ⅱ" (1990), 韓國文化社
- 손호민, "긴形과 짧은 形", 語學硏究, 14(24) (1996), 서울대학교 어학연구소
- 송석중, "韓國의 文法의 새 照明" (1993), 知識産業社
- Shibatani, Masayoshi, "Lexical versus Periphrastic Causatives in Korean", Journal of Linguistics, 9 (1973)
- Shibatani, Masayoshi, "On the Nature of Synonymy in Causative Expressions", Language Research, 11 (1975)
- 강영부, "全体․部分を表する ‘V+(s)ase’ 構文", 日本学報, 49 (2001), 한국일본학회
- 김창남, "日本語の使役形式について", 일어일문학연구, 59(1), pp.155~174 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
- 김희성, "『する』と『させる』の選択原理", 일본어문학, 22 (2004), 일본어문학회
- 이정숙, "日本語の非情物の使役文に関する一考察", 일어일문학연구, 29 (1996), 한국일어일문학회
- 青木伶子, "使役ー自動詞․他動詞との関わりにおいてー", 成蹊国文, (10) (1977), 成蹊大学 日本文学科研究室
- 天野みどり, "経験的間接関与表現-構文間の意味的密接性の違い, in: 日本語のボイスと他動性" (1991), くろしお出版
- 井上和子, "変形文法と日本語(上)" (1976), 大修館書店
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ" (1982), くろしお出版
- 早津恵美子, "第5章使役表現, in: 朝倉日本語講座6文法Ⅱ" (2004), 朝倉書店
- 강영부, "한국어 ‘게 하다’와 일본어의 ‘-(さ)せる’ー生産性의 차이를 중심으로", 일어일문학연구, 31 (1997), 한국일어일문학회
- 유장옥, "韓․日言語使役의 制約要素에 関한 研究", 2001年冬季学術大会要旨集 (2001), 한국일어일문학회
- 이정숙, "일본어의 사역표현에 대해서―한국어와의 대응관계를 중심으로", 일어일문학연구, 19 (1991), 한국일어일문학회
- 임헌찬, "日ㆍ韓両言における使役文ー使役文を構成する要素の相関関係を手がかりに してー", 朝鮮学報, 158 (1996), 朝鮮学会
- 임헌찬, "態(voice)の転換から見た日韓両語の使役文―日本語教育の立場から―" (1998)
- 임헌찬, , 일어일문학, 10, 대한일어일문학회
- 임, "日韓両言語における受動文と使役文―ボイスのカテゴリーの観点から―" (2003), 제이앤씨
- 정수현, "現代日本語と韓国語の受け身ㆍ使役表現, inL 論集日本語研究(一)現代篇" (1986), 明治書院
- 大村益夫, "日本語․朝鮮語の表現についてー受身と使役ー", 講座日本語教育 (1981), 早稲田大学語学研究所
- 塚本秀樹, "語彙的な語形成と統語的な語形成ー日本語と朝鮮語の対照研究" (1997), 国立国語研究所
- 피천득, "인연" (1996), 샘터사
- "『에버그린28』한국문학전집. 1996. 生活的. 손창섭. 양우당", ~ (1996)
- "『韓国短篇小説選』.1988. 三角の家. いとしき里よ丘の上. ドラの音. トリョン峠の烏. 大村 益夫․長璋吉․三枝寿勝編訳. 韓日対訳文庫. 岩波書店", ~ (1988)
- "세계일보. 2008․ 6․ 3", ~ (2008)
- "『愛と死』 .1988. 武者小路実篤. 新潮文庫", ~ (1988)
- "『高校教科書選』.1996. 山に行く心. わにのジレンマ. 다락원", ~ (1996)
- "『動物日本現代短篇文学選』. 1996. 魚の餌. 放浪記. 点と線. 新源氏物語. 日韓対訳 文庫. キムチョンドク", ~ (1996)
- "『夫婦の情景』.1994. 曾野綾子. 日韓対訳文庫. 다락원", ~ (1994)