『高等國語讀本』과 『高等朝鮮語及漢文讀本』에 나타나는 일한 양국어의 대응 양상 및 특성 ― 기사의 내용과 일한 양국어의 조사를 중심으로 ―
A study on the corresponding aspects and characteristics of appeared in “godeung gugeo dokbon” and “godeung joseoneo geub hanmundokbon”:Focusing on article contents and case mark
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the Corresponding aspect and the transition process between Korean language texts “godeung joseoneo dokbon”(1913), “sinpyeon joseoneo dokbon” (1924) with Japanese language texts “godeung gugeo dokbon”(1913), “sinpyeon gugeo dokbon”(1924), which were used at the time of the early 1900's in Korea. The results are presentede as follows: 1. Regarding the contents of the textbooks, in “godeung joseoneo dokbon” was introduced agriculture like rice and chicken, in addition to Tokyo and the Emperor. However in “sinpyeon joseoneo dokbon”, Korean characters and industrialization were introduced to emphasize of affinity with Japan. 2. In the characteristics of case marker of Japanese and Korean, there were case markers showing the change of meaning. And case marker of causes, means, and methods were much more diversified in “sinpyeon gugeo dokbon” than in “godeung gugeo dokbon”. Finally, the number of case marker combination increased. 3. About the corresponding aspects of Korean and Japanese, First, Korean added a lot of nominative case that does not appear in Japanese language in “sinpyeon joseoneo dokbon”. And the frequency of use of the postpositional particle was increased. It seemed to be affected by Japanese and mixed style of Korean and Chinese characters.
Abstract
This study examines the Corresponding aspect and the transition process between Korean language texts “godeung joseoneo dokbon”(1913), “sinpyeon joseoneo dokbon” (1924) with Japanese language texts “godeung gugeo dokbon”(1913), “sinpyeon gugeo dokbon”(1924), which were used at the time of the early 1900's in Korea. The results are presentede as follows: 1. Regarding the contents of the textbooks, in “godeung joseoneo dokbon” was introduced agriculture like rice and chicken, in addition to Tokyo and the Emperor. However in “sinpyeon joseoneo dokbon”, Korean characters and industrialization were introduced to emphasize of affinity with Japan. 2. In the characteristics of case marker of Japanese and Korean, there were case markers showing the change of meaning. And case marker of causes, means, and methods were much more diversified in “sinpyeon gugeo dokbon” than in “godeung gugeo dokbon”. Finally, the number of case marker combination increased. 3. About the corresponding aspects of Korean and Japanese, First, Korean added a lot of nominative case that does not appear in Japanese language in “sinpyeon joseoneo dokbon”. And the frequency of use of the postpositional particle was increased. It seemed to be affected by Japanese and mixed style of Korean and Chinese characters.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강진호, "‘국어’ 교과서의 형성과 일제 식민주의 －『국어독본』(1907)과 『조선어독본』(1911)을 중심으로－", 현대소설연구, (46), pp.65~100 (2011), 한국현대소설학회
- 김선효, "관형격 조사구에서의 助詞 結合과 變遷", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(3), pp.105~128 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 김윤주, "일제강점기 『조선어독본』과 『국어독본』의 비교 - 제1차 교육령기 보통학교 1·2학년 교과서를 중심으로 -", 우리어문연구, (41), pp.137~166 (2011), 우리어문학회
- 김혜련, "식민지기 문학교육과 정전 논의 －제2차 조선교육령기(1922~1938) 국어 교과서를 중심으로－", 문학교육학, (28), pp.405~433 (2009), 한국문학교육학회
- 문혜윤, "식민지 국어 교과서의 글쓰기- 『보통학교 학도용 조선어독본』(1911)을 중심으로 -", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (71), pp.155~178 (2015), 한민족어문학회
- 박선영, "近代韓？語の 文章における日本語の 影響- -「에 依하여」의 생성을 중심으로-", 일어일문학연구, 53(1), pp.121~144 (2005), 한국일어일문학회
- 박영숙, "『訂正普通学校学徒用國語讀本』の分析 －『日語読本』との漢字比較を中心に－", 일본문화연구, (46), pp.159~177 (2013), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
- 송숙정, "메이지기 독본 교과서의 외래어표기에 관한 고찰", 日本語文學, 1(76), pp.65~83 (2018), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
- 이준환, "開化期 學部 편찬 讀本 자료의 언어 양상－『國民小學讀本』, 『小學讀本』, 『新訂尋常小學』을 대상으로－", 어문연구(語文硏究), 41(4), pp.81~108 (2013), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 임상석, "국한문체 작문법과 계몽기의 문화 의식－ 최재학(崔在學)의 ≪실지응용작문법(實地應用作文法)≫", 한국언어문화, (33), pp.81~108 (2007), 한국언어문화학회
- 임상석, "일제강점기, 조선총독부의 조선어급한문 교과서 연구 시론 -중등교육 교재 『고등조선어급한문독본』을 중심으로-", 漢文學報, 22, pp.131~172 (2010), 우리한문학회
- 임상석, "조선총독부 고등조선어급한문독본의 번역 양상: 총독부 국어독본과의 비교연구", 비교문학, (62), pp.33~52 (2014), 한국비교문학회
- 임상석, "국한문체의 형성과 번역 - 근대 초기 문자의 교체와 식민지", 반교어문연구, (38), pp.107~130 (2014), 반교어문학회
- 임순영, "『중등교육조선어급한문독본(中等敎育朝鮮語及漢文讀本)』과 타(他) 독본과의 비교 연구: 『時文讀本』, 『中等朝鮮語作文』, 『文藝讀本』과의 관련성을 중심으로", 한국문학이론과 비평, 18(3), pp.135~160 (2014), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 조재형, "近代國語 時期의 副詞格助詞 ‘-에’와 敍述語의 關係 考察", 용봉인문논총, (52), pp.225~252 (2018), 인문학연구소
- 주미선, "1910年代国語(日本語)教科書についての一考察 －『普通学校国語読本』と『尋常小学読本』を中心に－", 일본언어문화, (39), pp.103~115 (2017), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 土井忠生, "國語史要說", pp.126~181 (1998), 修文館
- 日本語記述文法硏究會, "現代日本語文法", pp.104~106 (2009), くろしお出版
- 丸山直子, "コーパスにおける格助詞の使用実体 BCCWJ. CSJIにみる分布", 計量国語学, 30(3), pp.127~145 (2015), 計量国語学会
- 武島力也, "複合助詞「に関して」における連体用法と連用用法の通時的分析 -「についてと比較して」-", 札幌国語研究, 21, pp.97~ (2016), 北海道教育大学