일본 外務省藏版 19세기 말 조선어 교재의 언어 사용 양상과 특징:『교린수지』와『인어대방』을 중심으로
Aspects and Characteristics of the Language Usage of the Korean Textbooks Published by Japanese Foreign Ministry in the Late 19th Century
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
At the late 19th century, the orthography of Gyorinsuji(交隣須知) andIneodaebang(隣語大方) generally follows the Korean orthographic history ofthat times; some have extraordinary examples that follows the phoneticorthography. We understand that such phonetic orthography is that Japaneseseem to have difficulties in automatically adopting the underlying Koreanphonological rules to morphological orthography. The documents generallyrepresent the phonological characteristics of the late 19th century of theKorean-central-dialect, but there are some of the examples which do notfollow the general phenomena. The ‘ㄷ palatalization’ has shown moreconservative form in the none-initial syllable and in Sino-Korean than that ofthe Korean-central dialect. The ‘ㅡ>ㅜ’ labialization has shown 90% progressof diffusion, which means when it comes to compare with the 30%labialization diffusion of the Korean-central-dialect at that time, it wascompletely different phenomenon. We assume that it could have been affectedby Japanese language or by the documents written previously in Gyeongsangdialect. In regard of the lexicon usage, Gyorinsuji have drawn on vernacularwords, basic words, single words in general; Ineodaebang have used morespecial and professional Sino-Korean words, and it also have more writtenexpressions. Yet there were less difference in word class. Thus we canconclude that Gyorinsuji was basic word centered book; the elementary levelof Chosun word usage. Ineodaebang, on the other hand, was based on the professional knowledge based Chosun language study book; the practicalpurposes of reading and writing of interpreters’ foreign affairs.
Abstract
At the late 19th century, the orthography of Gyorinsuji(交隣須知) andIneodaebang(隣語大方) generally follows the Korean orthographic history ofthat times; some have extraordinary examples that follows the phoneticorthography. We understand that such phonetic orthography is that Japaneseseem to have difficulties in automatically adopting the underlying Koreanphonological rules to morphological orthography. The documents generallyrepresent the phonological characteristics of the late 19th century of theKorean-central-dialect, but there are some of the examples which do notfollow the general phenomena. The ‘ㄷ palatalization’ has shown moreconservative form in the none-initial syllable and in Sino-Korean than that ofthe Korean-central dialect. The ‘ㅡ>ㅜ’ labialization has shown 90% progressof diffusion, which means when it comes to compare with the 30%labialization diffusion of the Korean-central-dialect at that time, it wascompletely different phenomenon. We assume that it could have been affectedby Japanese language or by the documents written previously in Gyeongsangdialect. In regard of the lexicon usage, Gyorinsuji have drawn on vernacularwords, basic words, single words in general; Ineodaebang have used morespecial and professional Sino-Korean words, and it also have more writtenexpressions. Yet there were less difference in word class. Thus we canconclude that Gyorinsuji was basic word centered book; the elementary levelof Chosun word usage. Ineodaebang, on the other hand, was based on the professional knowledge based Chosun language study book; the practical
참고문헌 (22)
- 김주필, "이기문 교수 정년기념 논총", pp.116~137 (1996), 신구문화사
- 김주필, "司譯院 倭學書에 나타난 音韻變化의 過程과 特性 -口蓋音化와 圓脣母音化 現象의 擴散 過程을 중심으로-", 어문연구(語文硏究), 36(4)통권 : 140, pp.43~71 (2008), 한국어문교육연구회
- 김주필, "對馬島 宗家文庫 所藏 한글 書簡類의 性格과 特 徵", 朝鮮學會學術發表會集, pp.1~21 (2012), 日本 후쿠오까대학
- 김주필, "조선어 교재로서의 『隣語大方』과 일본어 교재로서의 『隣語大方』", 어문연구(語文硏究), 41(3), pp.37~66 (2013), 한국어문교육연구회
- 김주필, "ㄷ구개음화와 원순모음화 현상의 통시적 변화와 특성", 진단학보, (118), pp.95~137 (2013), 진단학회
- 남기탁, "隣語大方의 國語學的 硏究", 어문연구, 11(1), pp.205~226 (1983), 한국어문교육연구회
- 박기영, "개화기 한국어의 음운 연구 : 일본에서 간행된 한국어 학습서를 중심으로", 박사, 국어학, pp.2005
- 박진완, "구한말 일본인에 의한 조선어 교육 방식 연구 − 초량어학소 復文 錄의 분석을 통해", 국제한국어교육학회 발표논문집 (2013)
- 박화진, "왜관관수일기를 통해 본 초량왜관의 생활상 - 1860년대 일기를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(33), pp.51~63 (2012), 동북아시아문화학회
- 성윤아, "근대 일본에서의 조선어회화 학습 열기 ― 조선어회화서 붐의 실체 ―", 아시아문화연구, 25, pp.67~91 (2012), 아시아문화연구소
- 신충균, "『隣語大方』의 異本 比較-筑波大本의 가필 정정 부분에 착안하여-", 日本語文學, (14), pp.277~298 (2002), 한국일본어문학회
- 신충균, "明治刊本 隣語大方의 韓國語", 日本語文學, (31), pp.129~150 (2006), 한국일본어문학회
- 이명희, "『交隣須知』와 對조선 무역과의 관계", 일어일문학연구, 58(2), pp.115~134 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
- 정근식, "구한말 일본인의 조선어교육과 통역경찰의 형성", 한국문학연구, (32), pp.7~55 (2007), 한국문학연구소
- 정승혜, "對馬島에서의 韓語 敎育", 어문연구(語文硏究), 34(2), pp.37~58 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
- 제등명미, "교린수지 증보본의 계보에 대하여", 인문학연구, 5, pp.238~254 (1998), 한림대학교 인문학연구소
- 편무진, "『交隣須知』筆寫本과 刊行本의 한국어 어휘의 비교* ―한일 근대어 연구자료로서의 가치성을 중심으로―", 日本文化學報, (49), pp.119~134 (2011), 한국일본문화학회
- 허재영, "한국어 학습서 <교린수지>의 분류항과 어휘 선정ㆍ배열 연구", 한국어 의미학, 38, pp.193~214 (2012), 한국어의미학회
- 山田寬人, "敎育機關에 있어서의 朝鮮語科의 設置와 廢止에 관한 一考察 -韓 日合邦前後를 중심으로", 일본문화학보, 9, pp.423~435 (2000), 한국일본문화학회
- 山田寬人, "植民地朝鮮における朝鮮語奬勵政策" (2004), 不二出版
- 岸田文隆, "隣語大方 解題", 隣語大方, pp.8~14 (2005), 不二文化
- 齊藤明美, "交隣須知の日本語" (2002), 至文堂
