일제강점기 일본인 조선어 학습자를 위한 조선어 교과서 연구― 『朝鮮語法及會話書』(1917)와 『中等學校 朝鮮語敎科書』(1935)를 중심으로 ―
A Study on Korean Textbooks for Japanese Learners of Korean During Japanese Colonial Rule - Focusing on ‘Cosenebep gup hoyhwase’(1917) and ‘Cundunghakgyo cosene gyokase’(1935)-
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines ‘cosenebep gup hoyhwase’(1917) and ‘cungdunghakgyo cosenegyokase’(1935), Korean textbooks for Japanese learners of Korean in Japanese school of Korea, with a special focus on composition and grammatical features of the textbook at the time. The results are presented as follows: 1. Regarding the characteristics of the textbooks, the contents of two materials were similar in terms of pronunciation, grammar, and conversation. However, there were some differences in the book’s organization, each unit’s composition, and especially the pronunciation section. In cundunghakgyo cosene gyokase, a unit’s composition changed from linear and partial structure to compound and sectional one, and the methods of pronunciation were accentuated according to International Phonetic Alphabet. It seemed to be affected by Japanese reformation. Regarding the contents of textbooks, the book centered on commerce, new cultures, and Chosun’s culture, though some were about basic necessities, e.g. clothes, food, and houses, showing the focus was changed from agriculture. 2. Some differences were shown in grammar features between two books. In the case of Japanese, pronunciation and orthography got simple, and frequently used expressions were different according to diverse periods. In the case of Korean, pronunciation and orthography became similar to those of the modern Korean, and it seemed to be affected by a unified draft of Hangul orthography. However, postpositional particles already showed various meanings in Coseonebep gup hoyhwase. The categories of postpositional particles were different in both books, indicating the categories of postpositional particles were not yet established till then. 3. About the corresponding aspects of Korean and Japanese, present progressive ‘go-itta’ appeared in cosene gyokase. It is shown that boundary between the causative and transitive verbs and that the difference of passive between both languages were already recognized at the time.
Abstract
This study examines ‘cosenebep gup hoyhwase’(1917) and ‘cungdunghakgyo cosenegyokase’(1935), Korean textbooks for Japanese learners of Korean in Japanese school of Korea, with a special focus on composition and grammatical features of the textbook at the time. The results are presented as follows: 1. Regarding the characteristics of the textbooks, the contents of two materials were similar in terms of pronunciation, grammar, and conversation. However, there were some differences in the book’s organization, each unit’s composition, and especially the pronunciation section. In cundunghakgyo cosene gyokase, a unit’s composition changed from linear and partial structure to compound and sectional one, and the methods of pronunciation were accentuated according to International Phonetic Alphabet. It seemed to be affected by Japanese reformation. Regarding the contents of textbooks, the book centered on commerce, new cultures, and Chosun’s culture, though some were about basic necessities, e.g. clothes, food, and houses, showing the focus was changed from agriculture. 2. Some differences were shown in grammar features between two books. In the case of Japanese, pronunciation and orthography got simple, and frequently used expressions were different according to diverse periods. In the case of Korean, pronunciation and orthography became similar to those of the modern Korean, and it seemed to be affected by a unified draft of Hangul orthography. However, postpositional particles already showed various meanings in Coseonebep gup hoyhwase. The categories of postpositional particles were different in both books, indicating the categories of postpositional particles were not yet established till then. 3. About the corresponding aspects of Korean and Japanese, present progressive ‘go-itta’ appeared in cosene gyokase. It is shown that boundary between the causative and transitive verbs and that the difference of passive between both languages were already recognized at the time.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김윤주, "일제강점기 『조선어독본』과 『국어독본』의 비교 - 제1차 교육령기 보통학교 1·2학년 교과서를 중심으로 -", 우리어문연구, (41), pp.137~166 (2011), 우리어문학회
- 민현식, "국어 맞춤법의 문제점에 대하여(1)", 先淸語文, 13, pp.21~35 (1982), 서울대학교 국어교육과
- 박기영, "일본인 학습자용 한국어 교재에 대한 고찰- 1890년~1945년에 간행된 교재를 중심으로 -", 이중언어학, (34), pp.131~158 (2007), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 오새내, "일제강점기 일본인 대상 조선어 교육에 종사한 조선인 교육자들의 행적에 대한 국어학사적 연구 - 언론 기록과 출판 자료를 중심으로 -", 우리어문연구, (55), pp.459~486 (2016), 우리어문학회[DOI]
- 오현아, "일제 강점기 일본인 대상 조선어 교재 분석 연구를 위한 시론", 한국언어문화학, 9(1), pp.199~219 (2012), 국제한국언어문화학회[DOI]
- 유수연, "한·일어 피동 표현의 비교 연구 : 19세기 말 이후 대역 자료를 중심으로", 박사, 일어일문학, pp.2008
- 유수연, "한‧일어 피동 표현의 동사의 변천 연구 -19세기 말 이후 대역자료를 중심으로-", 日本語文學, 1(54), pp.111~132 (2012), 한국일본어문학회
- 유수연, "일제강점기 일본어 학습서『日鮮語學敎範』에 대한 일고찰 - 피동과 사동을 중심으로 -", 일본어문학, (82), pp.133~154 (2018), 일본어문학회[DOI]
- 이강민, "近代日本語의 可能表現-洋学資料 言文一致体 小説를 중심으로-", 일본어문학, 11, pp.129~148 (2001), 한국일본어문학회
- 이강민, "開化期 日本의 韓國語 學習書", 일본학보, 67, pp.65~80 (2006), 한국일본학회
- 이미향, "일본어 화자를 위한 개화기 한국어교재의 언어 교수 고찰", 한국어교육, 18(1), pp.331~357 (2007), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 임상석, "일제강점기, 조선총독부의 조선어급한문 교과서 연구 시론 -중등교육 교재 『고등조선어급한문독본』을 중심으로-", 漢文學報, 22, pp.131~172 (2010), 우리한문학회
- 임상석, "조선총독부 고등조선어급한문독본의 번역 양상: 총독부 국어독본과의 비교연구", 비교문학, (62), pp.33~52 (2014), 한국비교문학회
- 주미선, "1910年代国語(日本語)教科書についての一考察 －『普通学校国語読本』と『尋常小学読本』を中心に－", 일본언어문화, (39), pp.103~115 (2017), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 최영철, "근대 계몽기 일본인의 한국어에 대한 관심과 한국어 학습서의 변화 -개항 이후 학제 도입부터 통감시대까지-", 어문론집, 57, pp.453~477 (2014), 중앙어문학회
- 편무진, "습일어정칙", pp.17~ (2005), 불이문화
- 한학성, "우리나라 외국어교육의 전통과 19세기말 유럽의 개혁교수법", 민족문화연구, (51), pp.495~524 (2009), 민족문화연구원
- 허재영, "일제강점기 일본인을 대상으로 한 조선어교육", 한국(조선)어교육연구, 2, pp.505~527 (2004), 중국한국 조선어교육연구학회
- 허재영, "일본인을 대상으로 한 조선어 교육 자료 4 조선어법급회화서", pp.3~363 (2011), 역락
- 허재영, "일본인을 대상으로 한 조선어 교육 자료 6 중등학교조선어교과서", pp.1~421 (2011), 역락
- 青木博史, "書評論文森勇太著『発話行為から見た日本語授受表現の歴史的研究』", 日本語の研究, 14(1), pp.50~56 (2018), 日本語学会
- 荻野千砂子, "授受動詞の視点の成立", 日本語の研究, 3(3), pp.1~16 (2007), 日本語学会
- 蟹江美幸, "日本語の使役表現と韓国語表現の比較 ‒翻訳小説を資料とした韓日対照を通して‒", 일본근대학연구, (45), pp.73~92 (2014), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 早津恵美子, "朝倉日本語講座文法Ⅱ", pp.128~150 (2004)
- 早津恵美子, "現代日本語の使役文", pp.332~337 (2016), ひつじ書房
- 前田直子, "書評論文早津恵美子著『現代日本語の使役文』", 日本語文法, 18(1), pp.38~46 (2018)