본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개화기 이후 일본어 ‘もの’의 의미 용법과 이에 대응하는 한국어의 특성 및 변화

A Diachronic Study of Korean Corresponding to Japanese Noun ‘mono’ from the Late 19th Century to the Early 21th Eentury

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study examines the diachronic aspect of the Japanese formal nouns ‘mono’ and their corresponding expressions in korean. the data analyzed in this study are Japaneses and Korean text books and translation materials form the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 21th century. Results are as follows. Firstly, reparading the distribution of semantic characteristics, ‘mono’ was used as a real noun, a formal noun, a substitute for a real noun, modality usages. However, in terms of frequency, in the end of the 19th century, a substitute noun was the representative semantic usage, whereas in he beginning of the 21th century, modality usage showed the highest response frequency. Next, in terms of corresponding expressions in Korean, While the correspondence frequency of ‘ges’ and ‘person’ was high in the data from the end of the 19th century, the frequency of appearance of ‘verb’ and ‘ges’ was high in the 21st century data. Because Japanese modality usage is translated verb in Korean. Secondly ‘ges’ is used as a corresponding word in almost all usages. Thirdly, it was confirmed that ‘to󰠏iu󰠏mono’ patterns was the changing stage from formal nouns to modality usage.

Abstract

This study examines the diachronic aspect of the Japanese formal nouns ‘mono’ and their corresponding expressions in korean. the data analyzed in this study are Japaneses and Korean text books and translation materials form the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 21th century. Results are as follows. Firstly, reparading the distribution of semantic characteristics, ‘mono’ was used as a real noun, a formal noun, a substitute for a real noun, modality usages. However, in terms of frequency, in the end of the 19th century, a substitute noun was the representative semantic usage, whereas in he beginning of the 21th century, modality usage showed the highest response frequency. Next, in terms of corresponding expressions in Korean, While the correspondence frequency of ‘ges’ and ‘person’ was high in the data from the end of the 19th century, the frequency of appearance of ‘verb’ and ‘ges’ was high in the 21st century data. Because Japanese modality usage is translated verb in Korean. Secondly ‘ges’ is used as a corresponding word in almost all usages. Thirdly, it was confirmed that ‘to󰠏iu󰠏mono’ patterns was the changing stage from formal nouns to modality usage.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 리필수, "선문통해", pp.1~124 (1922), 한성도서주식회사
  2. 방윤형, "動詞に接続する「ものだ」の意味と機能 -意味と機能の派生関係を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 102(1), pp.23~40 (2017), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  3. 송승희, "日本語の?もの(だ)?に關する分析と考察", 일본어문학, (35), pp.63~82 (2006), 일본어문학회
  4. 유수연, "19세기 말 20세기 초 일본어 형식명사 ‘こと, の’에 대응 하는 한국어의 양상과 변천", 일본어학연구, (68), pp.141~157 (2021), 한국일본어학회[DOI]
  5. 이기문, "국어사 개설", pp.1~185 (1961), 민중서원
  6. 최진희, "「もの」와 「こと」의 문법화에 관한 고찰-‘것’", ‘일’과 대조하여-, 2020, pp.(76), 281~298[DOI]
  7. 한명주, "현대국어 형식명사 구성의 양태성 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2006
  8. 현선령, "名詞的機能の「もの」+「だ」文と モダリティを表す「ものだ」文との関係 -主題と「ものだ」との関わりを中心に-", 일본어학연구, (33), pp.235~247 (2012), 한국일본어학회
  9. 홍사만, "국어 의존명사 {것}의 사적 연구", 어문론총, (44), pp.101~144 (2006), 한국문학언어학회
  10. 황윤실, "「モノダ」文の意味と構文構造‒「形容詞+モノダ」文を中心に‒", 일본근대학연구, (71), pp.27~46 (2021), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
  11. 佐藤憲正, "日本国語大事典", pp.1334~1335 (1972), 小学館
  12. 真田信治, "日本語史", pp.1~174 (2004), 語文学社
  13. 鈴木恵, "和化漢文における形式名詞の新生と文化について", 鎌倉時代語研究, 17, pp.29~50 (1994), 武蔵野書院
  14. 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4", pp.218~228 (2003), くろしお出版
  15. 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4", pp.15~16 (2003), くろしお出版
  16. 森田良行, "基礎日本語2-角川小事典8", pp.147~153 (1979), 角川書店
  17. 吉川武時, "形式名詞がこれでわかる", pp.9~34 (2003), ひつじ書房

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)