본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인도⋅태평양 지역 소다자 안보협력 -과거, 현재, 미래-

Minilateral Security Cooperation in the Indo⋅Pacific -Past, Present and Future-

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

인도⋅태평양 지역에서 다수의 양자와 소다자 안보협력이 중첩되는 그물망 네트워크가 형성되고 있다. 소다자 안보협력이 일반적으로 기존의 동맹, 파트너쉽, ‘국방협력 협정’에 기반을 두고 생겨나는 경향이 크기 때문에 인도⋅태평양 지역에서 미국이 소다자 안보협력을 주도하고 있다. 본 논문은 미국이 주도하는 소다자 안보협력을 중국이 자국을 봉쇄하기 위한 도구로 인식하여 미⋅중 지정학적 경쟁이 악화하는 것을 방지하기 위해, 중국이 포함되는 소다자 안보협력도 병행되어 추진⋅발전되어야 한다고 주장한다. 즉, 역내 소다자 협력의 최대 현안은 중국을 소다자 안보협력의 장으로 끌어내는 것이다. 특히 한국과 같은 역내 중견국가가 미⋅중 경쟁에 함몰되지 않는 다양한 소다자 안보협력을 적극적으로 추동해야 한다.

Abstract

In the Indo⋅Pacific region, a security network webbing a number of bilateral and minilateral security cooperation agreements has been emerging. As minilateral security cooperation tends to develop more easily from existing alliance, partnership and defense cooperation agreements, the US has been leading minilateral security cooperation in the region. This article notes that China (mis)perceives US-led minilateral security cooperation as an attempt by the US to encircle it. In order to assuage such a concern on China’s part, minilateral security cooperation that includes China should also be developed. That is, one of the most urgent tasks to accomplish with respect to facilitating minilateral security cooperation in the region is to induce China to take part in such minilateral security cooperation. Especially, a middle power such as South Korea should contribute to launching various types of minilateral security cooperation that are not subject to Sino-US geo-strategic competition.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Akutsu, Hiroyasu, "China’s Power and Asian Security" (2015), Routledge
  2. Alagappa, Muthiah, "Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features" (2003), Stanford University Press
  3. Alwis, Akshan, "A New Age of Minilateralism: Potential Solutions for the South China Sea Conundrum", Diplomatic Courier (June 7), ~ (2016)
  4. Basrur, Rajesh, "A time ofStrategic Partnerships", The Hindu (September 21), ~ (2017)
  5. Cha, V. D., "Complex patchworks: US alliances as part of Asia’s regional architecture", Asia Policy, 11(1) (2011)
  6. Chacko, Priya, "The Rise of the Indo-Pacific: Understanding Ideational Change and Continuity in India’s Foreign Policy", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4) (2014)
  7. Cronin, Patrick, "The Emerging Asia Power Web: The Rise of Bilateral Intra-Asian Security Ties" (2013), Center for a New American Security
  8. Green, M. J., "The Oxford handbook of the international relations of Asia" (2014), Oxford University Press
  9. He, Baogang, "Chinese Expanded Perceptions of the Region and Its Changing Attitudes Toward the Indo-Pacific: a Hybrid Vision of the Institutionalization of the Indo-Pacific", East Asia, 35(2), pp.117~132 (2018)
  10. He, Kai, "Three faces of the Indo-Pacific: Understanding the “Indo-Pacific” from an IR theory perspective", East Asia, 35(2), pp.149~161 (2018)
  11. Joshi, Y., "India-Japan-Australia minilateral: The promise and perils of balancing locally" (2017), Observer Research Foundation
  12. The Case for U.S.-ROK-Japan Trilateralism: Strengths and Limitations, "Kamphausen, Roy", NBR, ~, pp.Special Report. 70 (2018)
  13. Keohane, Robert, "The Demand for International Regime", International Organization, 36(2) (1982)
  14. Kinne, Brandon, "Defense Cooperation Agreement and th Emergence of a Global Security Network", International Organization, 72(4), pp.799~837 (2018)
  15. Liff, Adam P., "China and the US alliance system", The China Quarterly, 233, pp.137~165 (2018)
  16. "The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of the ‘Quad’" (2017)[URL]
  17. Mak, J. N., "Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation: National Interests and Regional Order" (2014), Armonk
  18. Effective Minilateralism for the EU: What, When and How, "Moret, E.", European Union Institute for Security Studies, ~ (2016)
  19. Naím, Moisés, "Minilateralism", Foreign Policy, 173, pp.135~136 (2009)
  20. "인도-일본-한국 3자대화의 중요성, JPI 공동연구 시리즈" (2012)[URL]
  21. 박재적, "Security Cooperation between South Korea and Australia: Bilateral for Minilateral?", Pacific Focus, 31(2), pp.167~186 (2016), 국제관계연구소[DOI]
  22. Patrick, S, "The New “New Multilateralism”: Minilateral Cooperation, but at What Cost?", Global Summitry, 1(2) (2015)
  23. Pritchard, Charles, "Failed Diplomacy: The Tragic Story of How North Korea Got the Bomb" (2007), Brookings Institution Press
  24. Tow, William, "Asia-Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security" (2001)
  25. Tow, William, "US-Japan-Australia Security Cooperation: Prospects and Challenges" (2015), Stimson
  26. The United States Security Strategy for East Asia-Pacific Region, "U.S. Department of Defense", Department of Defense, ~ (1998)
  27. Zhang, Jingquan, "China’s New Diplomacy and the Changing World" (2014), World Affairs Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)