한일수교와 일본표상 -1960년대 전반기의 한국영화와 영화검열-
Korea-Japan Amity and the Representation of Japan -Cinema Censorship and Korean Cinema in the First Half of the 1960s-
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper seeks to closely examine the characteristics and contexts of the Park Jung-Hee regime’s cultural politics and Korean Cinema in the first half of the 1960s by focusing on the truth behind censorship and cinematic phenomenon during a specific era before and after the establishment of amity between Korea and Japan. Korea-Japan amity was meant not only to develop Korea-Japan relations but an issue of legitimizing the Park Jung-Hee regime and as a critical plan intimately correlated to establishing the nation’s future. The Park Jung-Hee regime actively pursued a Korea-Japan summit for the purpose of economic development and concluded a Korea-Japan framework agreement in 1965, establishing amity and normalizing diplomatic relations. However, the majority of citizens found the government’s consistent humiliating and modest posture throughout the process of establishing this agreement problematic and began to express intense infuriation. The opposition struggle of the Korea-Japan agreement culminated with a student protest on June 3, 1964 and went on to expand further than mere anti-Japanese sentiment to rage at the Park Jung-Hee administration’s betrayal of nationalism and democracy, an administration who had previously committed publicly to uphold ‘national democracy’. Meanwhile, there was the rise of Japanese culture in Korean society which began in the early 1960s. In the 1950s, the Rhee Seung-man administration cried out for a ‘clean sweep of Japanese ways’ and suspended all exchanges between Korea and Japan. However, subsequent to the April revolution and the seizure of power by the Democratic Party, humanitarian exchange along with cultural exchanges between Korean and Japan were generously permitted. As a result of print materials, music, and movies, the domain of popular culture and the so-called ‘Japanese rage’ began to stir. Looking ahead at the point of signing the Korea-Japan agreement, the discussion enters a more serious level than that of Japanese films, Korean films and their exchanges. The movie industry began to accelerate the production and distribution of Japanese cultural goods. The Korean movie industry conveyed three different postures regarding Japan around the same time. 1) Adhering to the equation of ‘Japanese ways = box office hit’, various methods were utilized to attract Japan unto the screen 2) Adapting to the opposing atmosphere of the Korea-Japan agreement and appealing to the anti-Japanese sentiment of citizens by advocating nationalism. 3) Providing imaginary reconciliation via the narrative and spectacle of attaches between Korean and Japanese(romance, family relationship) in which beautiful and good Japanese woman sacrifice herself for Korean lover or persons. Although these three tendencies seem to be contrary to each other, these cinema was addressing the dual identity of Korean people as colonial subject. They reflect public need to solve the problem imaginarily by socially symbolic act such as cinema and cultural exchange. These cultural efforts were made vigorously to seek new relationship with Japan but reached a deadlock by the Park Jung-Hee regime’s cultural politics and cinema censorship. In the first half of 1960s, cinema censorship and policies of cinemas in regard to Korea-Japan relations were oppressive but more or less unprincipled,temporary or easily fluctuating. Ultimately, one government’s cultural policies acted as the leading cause to the promotion of malformations of Korea-Japan relations. Fixation on anti-communism became linked to the fear of cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan, the inconsistencies of the censorship policy extinguished the trust cultural artists had in the government and in tandem,disheartened the volition of Korea-Japan cultural exchanges. Furthermore, the anti-Japanese sentiment maintained by citizens was utilized as a foreign alibi to prop up the Park Jung-Hee regime’s inability to hold a liberal posture towards the Korea-Japan cultural exchanges. Such cultural policies of the Park Jung-Hee regime ultimately became the cause of discord between economic, political, and cultural levels of the Korea-Japan relations during the Cold War period, which more or less languished in a state of disproportionate deformity.
Abstract
This paper seeks to closely examine the characteristics and contexts of the Park Jung-Hee regime’s cultural politics and Korean Cinema in the first half of the 1960s by focusing on the truth behind censorship and cinematic phenomenon during a specific era before and after the establishment of amity between Korea and Japan. Korea-Japan amity was meant not only to develop Korea-Japan relations but an issue of legitimizing the Park Jung-Hee regime and as a critical plan intimately correlated to establishing the nation’s future. The Park Jung-Hee regime actively pursued a Korea-Japan summit for the purpose of economic development and concluded a Korea-Japan framework agreement in 1965, establishing amity and normalizing diplomatic relations. However, the majority of citizens found the government’s consistent humiliating and modest posture throughout the process of establishing this agreement problematic and began to express intense infuriation. The opposition struggle of the Korea-Japan agreement culminated with a student protest on June 3, 1964 and went on to expand further than mere anti-Japanese sentiment to rage at the Park Jung-Hee administration’s betrayal of nationalism and democracy, an administration who had previously committed publicly to uphold ‘national democracy’. Meanwhile, there was the rise of Japanese culture in Korean society which began in the early 1960s. In the 1950s, the Rhee Seung-man administration cried out for a ‘clean sweep of Japanese ways’ and suspended all exchanges between Korea and Japan. However, subsequent to the April revolution and the seizure of power by the Democratic Party, humanitarian exchange along with cultural exchanges between Korean and Japan were generously permitted. As a result of print materials, music, and movies, the domain of popular culture and the so-called ‘Japanese rage’ began to stir. Looking ahead at the point of signing the Korea-Japan agreement, the discussion enters a more serious level than that of Japanese films, Korean films and their exchanges. The movie industry began to accelerate the production and distribution of Japanese cultural goods. The Korean movie industry conveyed three different postures regarding Japan around the same time. 1) Adhering to the equation of ‘Japanese ways = box office hit’, various methods were utilized to attract Japan unto the screen 2) Adapting to the opposing atmosphere of the Korea-Japan agreement and appealing to the anti-Japanese sentiment of citizens by advocating nationalism. 3) Providing imaginary reconciliation via the narrative and spectacle of attaches between Korean and Japanese(romance, family relationship) in which beautiful and good Japanese woman sacrifice herself for Korean lover or persons. Although these three tendencies seem to be contrary to each other, these cinema was addressing the dual identity of Korean people as colonial subject. They reflect public need to solve the problem imaginarily by socially symbolic act such as cinema and cultural exchange. These cultural efforts were made vigorously to seek new relationship with Japan but reached a deadlock by the Park Jung-Hee regime’s cultural politics and cinema censorship. In the first half of 1960s, cinema censorship and policies of cinemas in regard to Korea-Japan relations were oppressive but more or less unprincipled,temporary or easily fluctuating. Ultimately, one government’s cultural policies acted as the leading cause to the promotion of malformations of Korea-Japan relations. Fixation on anti-communism became linked to the fear of cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan, the inconsistencies of the censorship policy extinguished the trust cultural artists had in the government and in tandem,disheartened the volition of Korea-Japan cultural exchanges. Furthermore, the anti-Japanese sentiment maintained by citizens was utilized as a foreign alibi to prop up the Park Jung-Hee regime’s inability to hold a liberal posture towards the Korea-Japan cultural exchanges. Such cultural policies of the Park Jung-Hee regime ultimately became the cause of discord between economic, political, and cultural levels of the Korea-Japan relations during the Cold War period, which more or less languished in a state of disproportionate deformity.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김동호, "한국영화 정책사" (2005), 나남출판
- 박정희, "중앙방송을 통한 정견발표", ~ (1963)
- 박태균, "박정희의 동아시아인식과 아시아 태평양 공동사회 구상", 역사비평, (76), pp.119~147 (2006), 역사문제연구소
- 백낙청, "한반도식 통일, 현재진행형" (2006), 창작과비평
- 배수경, "한국 영화검열제도의 변천에 관한 연구", 중앙대 첨단영상대학원, ~ (2004)
- 우카이 사토시, "반일과 동아시아" (2005), 소명출판
- "이우성 ㆍ 차하순 좌담" (1972), 월간중앙
- 최장집, "동아시아와 한일교류" (2006), 아연출판부
- 프란츠 파농, "검은 피부, 하얀 가면" (1998), 인간사랑
- 한일관계사연구논집, "해방후 한일관계의 쟁점과 전망" (2005), 경인문화사
- 한일관계사학회, "한일관계 2천년: 보이는 역사, 보이지 않는 역사-근현대" (2006), 경인문화사
- Fredric Jameson, "The Political Unconscious" (1981), Cornell University Press
- N.V.Volosinov, "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), Seminar Press
- 한국영상자료원, "신문기사로 본 한국영화 1962~1964" (2006), 공간과사람들
- 한국영상자료원, "신문기사로 본 한국영화 1965~1966" (2007), 공간과사람들
- 한국영상자료원, "신문기사로 본 한국영화 1967" (2008), 공간과사람들
- "눈 가리고 아웅", 판치는 왜색 붐, 미국 거쳐 공공연히 수입, pp.질 낮은 작품 단속 해이 틈타, 동아일보[DOI]
- "먼저 한일 문화교류를", 한국을 다녀와서, 지난날 과오 알릴 의무, pp.미산계지, 동아일보[DOI]
- "문제점 많은 한일 영화교류", 당국, 확고한 정책 없이 태도 모호, 1966
- "물밀 듯 상륙하는 ‘일본색’ 맞는 영화정책", 무분별한 상혼에 미온적인 시책도 흐지부지, 1966
- "사설: 새로운 자기 문화의 창조", 한국일보, ~ (1963)
- "상영을 허가", 일 작품 모방했다는 조춘, 1959, ~
- "아시아영화제: 성황 이룬 아시아의 향연", 자유 우방의 기대 크다, 경향일보, pp.1962, ~
- 제작 중인 94편의 영화…거의 반수가 의심받아, "연예: 모호한 표절작품의 한계", 새 규준확립은 언제?
- "연예오락: 아직도 못 풀린 관의 영화검열", 자율적 심의 언제나…, 경향일보, pp.1964, ~
- "연예오락: ‘일본 색채’ 외화 규준을 작성", 미묘한 한계점, 경향일보, pp.1962[DOI]
- "영화와 사상성", 반공과 예술의 한계, 1965, ~
- 오영진, "1958년 문화계 결산, 영화계: 풍년 기근의 제작계", 동아일보, ~ (1958)
- "예술문화의 자유", 조선일보, ~ (1966)
- "64년 레뷰6 영화", 방송: 양쪽 다 질로는 ‘불모의 해’, RSB DTV 개국 등 양으론 푸짐, pp.조선일보, 1964[DOI]
- "일본의 전위파 감독 대도저(大島渚)씨의 한국영화 및 배우론", 뛰어난 연기력, 성우들 대리녹음으로 잡쳐버려, pp.조선일보, 1964[DOI]
- "제12회 아세아영화제 낙수", 권위 없고 견본시장 정도, 한국일보, pp.1965, ~
- "충고와 격려에 감사", <현해탄은 말이 없다>를 마치고, 한국일보, pp.1962, ~
- "취미오락: ‘스타’는 모험한다", 자칫하면 목숨도 잃는다, 전문가 코취 안 받아 사고, pp.문정숙 양의 낙마 중상이 말하는 것, 동아일보[DOI]
- 일본은 들어오고 있다, "문화", 번역판이 ‘베스트 셀러’로, 교과과정 닮은 꼴도 모르고, pp.경향일보, 1965[DOI]
